-
Henan Grave Carved with Herbal Prescriptions Draws Hundreds of Visitors Daily
-
Neo Nontso Reveals Anele Mdoda’s Calm Demeanor During Wedding Prep
-
NCLT Chennai Orders Insolvency Proceedings Against Orchid Pharma Founder K Raghavendra Rao
-
How Mystery Bounty Poker Tournaments Spread from Curiosity to Mainstream
-
Inflation Breach and Bond Yields Spark Rate Hike Fears for December
-
Market Buzz: Meesho Stake Sale, Clean Max’s ₹50,000 Crore Investment and Corporate Updates
-
Digi Power X Reports Q3 2026 Revenue Up 85% and AI Revenue Up Over 400% Compared to Q2
-
The 20 Most Shocking Documentaries Ranked: From Elizabeth Holmes to Man on Wire
-
Below Deck alumnus João Franco and brother arrested after fatal Turkey fight
-
Ole Miss inquiry expands after video and monkey-noise allegations
-
General Hospital actor Randall England dies at 75
-
Bunnie XO artwork taken down from Jelly Roll’s Nashville bar
-
London museum removes Russell Brand hair exhibit after rape conviction
-
Arlington sentinel rebukes Pete Hegseth entourage for laughter near memorial
Lidl owes French rival $50 mn after ads ruled deceptive
German supermarket chain Lidl faces a 43-million-euro ($50 million) payout to a French rival after an appeals court ruled its ads to be deceptive.
The Paris appeals court ordered Lidl to pay the amount to French chain Intermarche after finding hundreds of the television spots that it ran between 2017 and 2023 were likely to deceive consumers and amounted to unfair competition.
While Intermarche lost the original trial in 2022, the appeals court considered in its July 4 ruling that Lidl's ads were deceptive as the hard discount retailer had not ensured the items it promoted were available in all of its shops at the advertised price for a period of 15 weeks.
The appeals court judge found that in the more than 370 ads contested by Intermarche that Lidl had prominently featured the products and prices but had used small print or brief off-screen voice mentions to see its website for participating stores.
The court ruled those mentions were "likely to go unnoticed by the consumer or at the very least be misunderstood."
Moreover, it considered that by knowing it didn't have the products available at all sites for a sufficient time that Lidl's actions went from being deceptive practices to unfair competition, thus opening the way for compensation to its rival.
Intermarche declined to comment when contacted by AFP.
S.Spengler--VB