-
Injured Australian swim star O'Callaghan pulls out of PanPacs
-
Veteran Wallabies playmaker Quade Cooper eyes World Cup comeback
-
California lifeguards wiped out from extreme weather
-
FIFA scraps private investment plan after backlash
-
FIFA scraps private investment plan after backlash: Infantino
-
US plans steep water cuts for southwest amid Colorado River crisis
-
South Africa's WAFCON hopes hang in the balance after dramatic draw
-
Nakashima ousts top seed de Minaur, Osaka advances at Washington
-
Hunter Bell cruises to Commonwealth gold, Pathirage stuns javelin stars
-
Nakashima ousts top seed de Minaur and Osaka advances at Washington
-
Amazon surges as US stocks shrug off bond yield worries
-
Nakashima ousts defending champion de Minaur to reach Washington semis
-
Google rolls back new satellite image AI tool after backlash
-
Magaia salvages last-gasp WAFCON draw for South Africa
-
Ryu leads in bid for third straight major at women's British Open
-
Forever chemicals and pesticides under Trump: what to know
-
Fire-hit France region 'coming up for air' as main blaze calms
-
US announces steep water cuts for three states amid Colorado River crisis
-
Wembanyama to get signature shoe in Nike contract extension: reports
-
EU grapples with migrant crisis in Spain's N. Africa enclave
-
Oil giants report blowout profits on war, warn high gas prices could persist
-
Hungary to shut nuclear plant as heatwave hits central Europe
-
Google launches new satellite image AI tool, alarming researchers
-
Strengthening El Nino 'adding fuel to a planet already on fire': UN chief
-
Eddie Howe resigns as Newcastle boss to 'recharge'
-
Tech-fuelled rally fizzles as oil prices rise
-
High winds hamper firefighting efforts in western Turkey
-
Chelsea's Mudryk cleared to play after doping ban appeal
-
Howe resigns as Newcastle boss
-
A side of oysters for France's flat-out firefighters
-
Full-scale tour will benefit All Blacks, says coach Rennie
-
England cricket chief Key refuses to rule out Stokes return
-
US Fed dissenters call for rate hikes over sustained inflation
-
New blazes in Greece as strong winds hamper firefighting
-
Trump and far-right seize on Spanish migration crisis
-
Springboks star Feinberg-Mngomezulu back for Argentina Test
-
Hamas agrees to disarm under Trump plan
-
Shops closed, businesses quiet as Spain's Ceuta faces migrant surge
-
French, Italian winegrowers face earliest ever harvest
-
Chelsea fined £10mn, handed suspended transfer ban for breaching agent rules
-
Alarm over climate-linked low level of German waterways
-
Residents defend Spain’s ancient 'El Abuelo' tree from flames
-
UK court rejects challenge against new Chinese embassy in London
-
Forever chemicals and pesticides: what to know
-
New York sues online prediction markets giant Kalshi
-
Spaniard Santi Denia takes over as Czech Republic coach
-
Commerzbank agrees to talks with UniCredit after two-year standoff
-
EU races to contain new migrant crisis as thousands cross into Spain's N. Africa enclave
-
A rumour, a rush: chaos at Morocco border with Spain's Ceuta
-
Profits surge at US oil giant amid Iran war supply shock
Study links major polluters to big climate damages bill
The economic cost of carbon emissions is far higher than previously estimated, said a new study Wednesday that links big polluters to tens of trillions of dollars in climate-related damages worldwide.
The study in the journal Nature measures how human-caused warming affects economic growth and assigns a share of global damages to specific emitters -- from major economies to oil giants.
The findings land as a growing wave of lawsuits seek to hold fossil fuel producers and other carbon-heavy businesses accountable for climate "loss and damage".
Claimants argue that large polluters are legally liable for their outsized contribution to climate change and its associated extreme weather events, particularly in poorer nations.
This study did not seek to answer the "legal and ethical" question of compensation, said Marshall Burke, a professor at Stanford University and the study's lead author.
"Our goal was first and foremost scientific, but we hope to contribute to the broader policy discussion of how to measure loss and damage and what to do about it," Burke told AFP.
It does offer "guidance" on the scale of potential costs and a framework "for estimating how specific emissions from specific emitters at specific points in time lead to damages" worldwide, he added.
They assessed the impact of rising temperatures on economic factors including labour productivity and agriculture, but also some associated climate-driven weather extremes.
US emissions between 1990 and 2020 were the largest source of estimated global damages at $10.2 trillion followed by China ($8.7 trillion) and the European Union ($6.4 trillion).
Emissions linked to Saudi oil giant Saudi Aramco between 1988 and 2015 resulted in $3 trillion in cumulative global economic damages by 2020, the study also said.
- Settling debts -
But the authors found the largest share of climate damages lies ahead.
"We were surprised not only by the overall magnitude of estimated damages, which are in the tens of trillions of dollars, but also by how much larger future damages from past emissions are than past damages from past emissions," Burke said.
One tonne of C02 emitted in 1990 caused about $180 in global damages by 2020, but was expected to inflict a further $1,840 through 2100 -- roughly 10 times more than the costs already incurred.
This is because CO2 has a long lifespan, lingering in the atmosphere where it contributes to warming for decades to come.
For this reason "settling debts for past damages will not settle debts for past emissions", the authors wrote.
Even under relatively conservative assumptions, the cost per tonne of carbon emitted is far higher than many government estimates.
The research also highlights how high-emitting activities such as air travel contribute to future damage. Taking a long-haul flight each year over a decade, for example, could generate around $25,000 in losses by 2100.
As emissions rise and poorer nations bear the brunt, wealthy countries and fossil fuel businesses are facing mounting scrutiny over their disproportionate role in driving climate damage.
Last year, a separate Nature study found extreme heat linked to emissions from 111 fossil fuel companies caused $28 trillion in global economic losses between 1991 and 2020.
Companies have long argued it is impossible to attribute harm from a global problem to any single emitter, and courts have been cautious about awarding compensation.
L.Wyss--VB