-
Day of reckoning arrives for social media after US court loss
-
World Cup concerns are exaggerated, says FIFA vice-president
-
Oil prices slip, stocks rally as Washington, Tehran bicker over talks
-
NBA team owners approve exploring expansion to Seattle and Las Vegas
-
UK teenagers to trial social media bans, digital curfews
-
World champions England still 'unfinished' ahead of Six Nations, says Mitchell
-
Rybakina outlasts Pegula to reach Miami Open semis
-
Barca build huge lead on Real Madrid in Women's Champions League quarters
-
Alleged Rihanna mansion shooter pleads not guilty
-
US jury finds Meta, YouTube liable in social media addiction trial
-
US says Iran talks continue, will 'unleash hell' if no deal
-
UN designates African slave trade as 'gravest crime against humanity'
-
Trump's Beijing trip rescheduled for May, after Iran delay
-
No more excuses: World Cup pressure is on for host USA
-
US EPA issues waiver for E15 fuel to address oil supply issues
-
Grieving families hail court victory against Instagram, YouTube
-
Internet providers not liable for music piracy by users: top US court
-
Gaza civil defence says Israeli strike kills one, tents on fire
-
UK govt denies cover-up after PM ex-aide's phone stolen
-
California jury finds Meta, YouTube liable in social media addiction trial
-
Oil prices slip, stocks rally on Mideast peace hopes
-
South Africa police clash with anti-immigrant protesters
-
Gattuso says Italy's World Cup play-off 'biggest match' of career
-
Sakamoto leads skating swansong with 'Time to Say Goodbye' at worlds
-
Spanish PM says Middle East war 'far worse' than Iraq in 2003
-
First Robot: Melania Trump brings droid to White House event
-
Oldest dog DNA suggests 16,000 years of human companionship
-
Iran media casts doubt on US peace plan
-
Rare mountain gorilla twins born in DR Congo: park authorities
-
Ex-midwife enthroned as first female Archbishop of Canterbury
-
AC Schnitzer: When Iconic Tuners Fall Silent
-
Senegal lodge appeal to Court of Arbitration for Sport over AFCON final decision
-
South Africa seal T20 series win in New Zealand
-
Study links major polluters to big climate damages bill
-
Ex-Google chief Matt Brittin made new BBC director-general
-
Iran likely behind attacks sowing fear among Europe's Jews: experts
-
'Relieved' McGrath claims career first crystal globe in slalom
-
US ski star Shiffrin wins overall World Cup title for sixth time
-
Trump names tech titans to science advisory council
-
Mideast war sparks long queues at Kinshasa petrol stations
-
US TV star details 'agony' over mother's disappearance
-
Tehran receives US plan to end Mideast war, as Iran fires at US carrier
-
Aviation, tourism, agriculture... the economic sectors hit by the war
-
Iran fires at US carrier as backchannel diplomacy aims to end war
-
Salah's long goodbye brings curtain down on golden era for Liverpool
-
Monaco: city of vice and a few virtues
-
AI making cyber attacks costlier and more effective: Munich Re
-
Defying Israeli bombs, Lebanese hold out in southern city of Tyre
-
War-linked power crunch pushes Sri Lanka to four-day week
-
Hungary says will phase out gas deliveries to Ukraine
Internet providers not liable for music piracy by users: top US court
The US Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday in a landmark copyright case that internet service providers (ISPs) are not liable for online pirating of music by their users.
Cox Communications, a major broadband ISP, had asked the top court to throw out a jury verdict awarding $1 billion in damages to Sony Music Entertainment and other record labels.
Cox was accused in the case of failing to take action against customers accused of illegally downloading copyrighted music.
In a unanimous 9-0 ruling, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Cox and said an ISP was liable "only if it intended that the provided service be used for infringement."
"A company is not liable as a copyright infringer for merely providing a service to the general public with knowledge that it will be used by some to infringe copyrights," the court said in an opinion written by Justice Clarence Thomas.
"Cox repeatedly discouraged copyright infringement by sending warnings, suspending services, and terminating accounts," the court said.
"A provider induces infringement if it actively encourages infringement through specific acts," it said. "Cox neither induced its users' infringement nor provided a service tailored to infringement."
Cox Communications welcomed the court's decision, calling it a "decisive victory for the broadband industry and for the American people who depend on reliable internet service."
"This opinion affirms that internet service providers are not copyright police and should not be held liable for the actions of their customers," the company said in a statement.
The ruling was also welcomed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which called it a "win for freedom of expression online."
"If defined too broadly, secondary copyright liability for internet service providers can pose a serious threat to free speech online," Evelyn Danforth-Scott, an ACLU attorney, said in a statement.
The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) meanwhile expressed disappointment.
"To be effective, copyright law must protect creators and markets from harmful infringement," RIAA chairman and CEO Mitch Glazier said.
During oral arguments before the Supreme Court in December, Joshua Rosenkranz, an attorney representing Cox, had warned of "cataclysmic" consequences if the court did not limit the company's copyright liability.
The only way for an ISP to avoid liability is to "cut off the internet, not just for the accused infringer, but for anyone else who happens to use the same connection," Rosenkranz said.
"That could be entire towns, universities or hospitals, turning internet providers into internet police," he said.
H.Kuenzler--VB