-
Dodgers return to Trump White House despite fan anger
-
Rosalia's Argentine fans up in arms over alleged World Cup snub
-
Lyles, Richardson ease into 100m semis at US athletics championships
-
Six candidates to lead UN take stage for televised debate
-
Salman Rushdie testifies at knife attacker's US terror trial
-
King Charles opens slimmed down Commonwealth Games in Glasgow
-
World Bank confirms plan to phase out China lending by 2031
-
US unveils new tariffs on 60 partners as Trump rebuilds trade agenda
-
US panel backs trendy peptides despite safety concerns
-
WNBA viral star Cunningham wades into trans athletes row
-
Justice Dept withdraws NY Times subpoenas over Trump plane report
-
Hearn dismisses Fury talk of Joshua no-show for super fight
-
Barcelona's De Jong returns from World Cup with torn ligament
-
'Like a war zone': France evacuates 20,000 due to wildfires
-
Albania police teargas protesters against Trump-linked resort
-
Ships avoid Ukrainian grain ports after Russian attacks
-
US panel says to loosen restrictions on popular peptide despite safety concerns
-
Oil passes $100 a barrel again: why it's more serious this time
-
Verstappen swerves around future questions
-
Who are the six candidates vying to lead the UN?
-
EU renews online child sex abuse detection powers
-
Hamilton proud of recovery after hitting rock bottom a year ago
-
Airbus, Boeing fly in different directions at Farnborough
-
Carapaz eyes polkadot mountains jersey after stage win
-
Bab al-Mandeb Strait: another key oil shipping route under threat
-
Fields medal awarded to four young mathematicians
-
Deadly wildfires in Europe force thousands to flee
-
Carapaz claims Tour de France stage as Pogacar loses key team-mate
-
NATO to overhaul European fuel pipeline network
-
Alonso welcomes Aston Martin upgrade, warns against unreal expectations
-
US trade envoy to make tariff announcement as 10% duty soon expires
-
Anderson declares Man City 'kings of Manchester' after £116 mn move
-
Trump stuns Saudis by pinning nuclear deal to Israel ties
-
Relieved Russell says Mercedes have solved his power problems mystery
-
Tough day for Ubisoft stock topped with weaker revenues
-
Oil soars above $100 as Middle East fears grow
-
Swelling jet fuel costs hit American Airlines outlook
-
Venezuelans turn to scrap collecting in quake-hit beach 'paradise'
-
Carapaz climbs unopposed to Tour de France 18th stage win
-
Heptathlon champion Johnson-Thompson joins list of Commonwealth Games absentees
-
Sooryavanshi hits maiden 50 as India thump Zimbabwe in T20
-
Nigeria's Dangote raises $2.5bn to expand Africa's largest refinery
-
ECB opens door to September rate-hike as Iran war flares up
-
Oil soars to $100 on fresh Mideast attacks
-
World Bank estimates Venezuela quakes caused $19.6 bn in damage
-
Coal-fired power generation rising globally on Mideast war: IEA
-
Italy's far-right line up to defend jeweller who killed robbers
-
Premier League champions Arsenal sign Greece winger Tzolis from Brugge
-
AI-led boom in IPOs raises concerns about a bust
-
French Jewish DJ sues after activists disrupt gig: lawyer
The secret agents of the Michelin Guide
They are paid to eat in the best restaurants in the world -- but the price is having to lie even to their friends about the job.
Hidden amongst hundreds of guests descending on the 16th century Chateau de Chambord in the Loire Valley for a luxurious dinner ahead of the Michelin Guide's annual ceremony on Monday was the group's covert inspectors.
One guest at the weekend event told AFP he worked in the automobile industry -- plausible given Michelin's main business of selling tyres.
But his knowledge of France's best restaurants was suspiciously encyclopedic.
Whether or not he was a Michelin inspector would remain a mystery, since they are sworn to secrecy.
Each year, the guide receives 8,000 spontaneous applications to become an inspector, its boss Gwendal Poullennec told AFP.
The key criteria are "professionalism" and "openness" -- to travel, different cultures and new experiences, he added.
Michelin does not say how many it employs -- part of the strict secrecy it maintains to ensure they are never recognised by a restaurant and given preferential treatment.
The guide does reveal that its inspectors currently include 25 different nationalities, and men and women of all ages, operating across the 45 destinations covered by Michelin.
- Undercover -
It is a full-time job, and all are drawn from the world of fine dining and hospitality: applicants must have at least 10 years of experience as chefs, sommeliers or hoteliers, according to the guide's website.
A new inspector is paired with a more experienced colleague for a training period of up to two years -- or around 800 meals -- to learn the Michelin method, the organisation told AFP.
The inspector then lives undercover. Only their inner circle of family are allowed to know -- and they have an interest in keeping quiet since they often tag along to meals to avert suspicion.
The most common cover story that inspectors give their friends and wider family is that they are "consulting" with restaurants on their business strategies -- a good excuse to travel and indulge.
They give false names and even change their phone numbers when making reservations -- vital since many restaurants now have applications to scan their bookings for journalists and potential inspectors.
The reviews require an excellent memory. The inspector must recall the tiniest details of the food, service and ambiance -- right down to the appearance of the toilets -- without taking notes, though phone pictures are now common.
They must also research the wider context -- the restaurant's suppliers, how it fits into the local community and its finances.
The final report sticks to five criteria: the quality of the ingredients, the culinary technique, the harmony of the flavours, the emotion which the chef is seeking to convey through their menu, and the restaurant's consistency over time. The latter requires multiple visits.
The awarding of a star -- with three stars as the absolute pinnacle -- must be a unanimous choice when inspectors meet to discuss their reviews.
If there is disagreement, further visits are organised until a consensus is reached.
A.Kunz--VB