-
Campbell back from four years in Wallabies wilderness to face Ireland
-
Next indirect US-Iran talks after Khamenei funeral: mediators
-
Migrants pick up pieces back home after fleeing South Africa
-
Reviving Montenegro's 'ancient' olive tree
-
Farrell names Leinster-heavy Ireland side to face Wallabies
-
Resource rich PNG leaving its Pacific people behind: World Bank
-
Fearing Russian strike, Kyiv's Holodomor museum evacuates exhibits
-
Papal envoy presides over first Vietnam beatification rite
-
Germany's energy-hungry small firms struggle with green shift
-
LeBron James praises Balogun after 'Silencer' celebration
-
Pochettino says Balogun foul 'never' a red card as suspension looms
-
Farrell names Leinster-heavy side to face Wallabies
-
Campbell back after four years in Wallabies team to face Ireland
-
Most Asia markets down as tech firms take fresh blow
-
Kane saves England as USA, Belgium reach last 16
-
South Korean school baseball team suspended over 'Tank Day' chants
-
Budding chefs cook up new career at China's BBQ academy
-
Ceuzany, Cape Verde's golden voice with volcanic emotion
-
One stitch at a time: Artist's mission to recreate the Bayeux Tapestry
-
Balogun scores and sees red as US beat Bosnia 2-0
-
Deadly Russian barrage pounds Ukraine capital
-
EU top court to rule on record 4.1 bn euro Google fine
-
Belgium coach salutes Tielemans after World Cup rescue act
-
'Job forever': trade schools are all the rage in the AI era
-
Cracking open a can of cannabis -- America's new pastime (for now)
-
Celtics reportedly trading Brown to Sixers in NBA blockbuster
-
Russia strikes Ukraine capital with missiles and drones, wounds five
-
Kane saves England after DR Congo scare; Belgium comeback stuns Senegal
-
Belgium late show floors Senegal at World Cup
-
Celtics to trade Jaylen Brown to 76ers for Paul George: report
-
Harry Kane: England's World Cup saviour
-
Streamex is making digital gold accessible
-
US actor Danny Glover says he has Alzheimer's
-
Mixed US auto sales in Q2 amid high gas prices
-
Trump sees progress as US, Iran hold Qatar talks
-
Pistons forward Harris reportedly headed to Spurs
-
Djokovic, Sinner into Wimbledon third round, Andreeva stunned
-
Jovial Djokovic dismantles Tsitsipas to reach Wimbledon third round
-
Spurs agree club record £100 mn move for Newcastle's Tonali - reports
-
US stocks retreat to open Q3 ahead of June jobs data
-
Rain has final say in 1st England-India T20 as Sooryavanshi still awaits debut
-
'Gus' the T. rex presented in New York ahead of auction
-
England refused to accept defeat in 'beautiful' DR Congo win, says Tuchel
-
Kane saves England after DR Congo scare; US eye last 16
-
'Let the dogs in': Sabalenka wants Wimbledon to lift ban
-
Catholic society defies Vatican by consecrating new bishops
-
Oppressive heat broils US during World Cup, July Fourth
-
New York prepares for Taylor Swift-Travis Kelce wedding
-
Can anyone stop France at the World Cup?
-
Pair climb to top of Empire State Building for apparent proposal
UK's Starmer faces down parliament over 'unpopular' benefit cut
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer survived an early test of his fledgling premiership on Tuesday when lawmakers backed his controversial plan to end fuel benefits for millions of pensioners.
The proposed cuts have sparked anger among some MPs within the ruling Labour party and set up the first flashpoint with its union backers since Starmer took office in July.
The furore highlights the challenge facing Britain's centre-left leader as he tries to fix an economy he says was broken by the previous Conservative government while also keeping supporters onside.
Labour announced in July that it would means test the winter fuel allowance, meaning 10 million pensioners will no longer receive help with their energy bills during the colder months.
Starmer admits the move is "unpopular" but insists "tough choices" are necessary to help close a £22 billion ($29 billion) "black hole" in the public finances that Labour claims they inherited from the Tories.
The former lawyer is spending much of his first months in power blaming the Conservatives for a dire economic inheritance, but Tory MPs accuse him of laying the groundwork for possible future tax rises.
- 'Painful' -
Starmer has asked Britons to "accept short-term pain for long-term good" but is already coming under pressure to offer the country a less gloomy outlook.
Last month he warned that the government's Budget in late October -- Labour's first official spending plan since it was last in power 14 years ago -- would be "painful".
He saw off any significant rebellion on Tuesday when MPs voted by 348 to 228 against a Conservative motion to block his government's decision to scrap the universal winter fuel payments.
Only one Labour MP voted with the opposition.
It was not immediately clear how many Labour lawmakers abstained but it is likely that several did since the government's normal majority of 167 in the House of Commons was reduced to 120.
"This is not a decision we wanted or expected to make. But when we promised we would be responsible with taxpayers' money, we meant it," work and pensions minister Liz Kendall said ahead of the vote.
The payments are worth £300 for some elderly people, and two major unions had called on Starmer to reverse his decision, which the Treasury estimates will save about £1.4 billion a year.
Labour maintains that a planned increase in the full state pension from next April will more than offset the removal of the winter fuel allowance.
But Unite boss Sharon Graham accused Labour of opting to "pick the pocket of pensioners" while leaving the richest "totally untouched".
Some 17 Labour MPs had signed a motion put forward by one of its newest members to delay implementing the cut.
The large majority secured during Labour's thumping general election win on July 4 means that Starmer is in a strong position to win votes even on controversial issues.
Commentators say now is the time for him to implement unpopular policies with the next election likely to be five years' away.
Starmer suspended seven of his own MPs in July after they backed a motion demanding the removal of the two-child limit on benefits introduced by the previous Conservative government.
T.Germann--VB