-
Ukrainian state ordered Nord Stream sabotage: German prosecutors
-
Former top jockey Dettori breaks ribs in car crash
-
Swiatek, Zverev aiming to lay down Wimbledon markers
-
Rees-Zammit returns to wing as Wales face Fiji
-
German ruling coalition agrees on major reform package
-
Renovations on historic Paris Opera house extended by three years
-
European stocks climb after Asia rout
-
Thailand denies viral claim Macron knelt before king
-
Former Arsenal, Spain midfielder Cazorla retires
-
Spain, Portugal eye World Cup last 16
-
German drone maker raises $1.2 bn as investors pile into defence
-
Russian strikes kill 17 in biggest ever attack on Kyiv, mayor says
-
French scramble to find air conditioners before next heatwave
-
Uruguay veteran Cavani quits Boca Juniors
-
Japan deploys bear cameras in moutains as attacks surge
-
West Ham's Fernandes joins Spurs
-
Germany's Infineon opens major chip plant as EU seeks tech autonomy
-
Bones of contention: More research needed on 'd'Artagnan corpse'
-
Biggest ever Russian barrage on Kyiv kills at least 13
-
Coffee with a view: tourists flock to Starbucks overlooking North Korea
-
EU top court upholds record 4.1 bn euro Google fine
-
German coalition agrees on reform package in key breakthrough
-
Italy name two debutants to face Japan in Nations Championship opener
-
France recall record try scorer Penaud for All Blacks Test
-
Wallabies' Schmidt rules out another coaching job
-
Seoul's Kospi tanks as Asia tech firms suffer another blow
-
India asks Meta to hold WhatsApp username rollout over fraud fears
-
'Outstanding' Love to start at fly-half for All Blacks against France
-
Deadly Russian barrage on Kyiv kills at least 13
-
Campbell back from four years in Wallabies wilderness to face Ireland
-
Next indirect US-Iran talks after Khamenei funeral: mediators
-
Migrants pick up pieces back home after fleeing South Africa
-
Reviving Montenegro's 'ancient' olive tree
-
Farrell names Leinster-heavy Ireland side to face Wallabies
-
Resource rich PNG leaving its Pacific people behind: World Bank
-
Fearing Russian strike, Kyiv's Holodomor museum evacuates exhibits
-
Papal envoy presides over first Vietnam beatification rite
-
Germany's energy-hungry small firms struggle with green shift
-
LeBron James praises Balogun after 'Silencer' celebration
-
Pochettino says Balogun foul 'never' a red card as suspension looms
-
Farrell names Leinster-heavy side to face Wallabies
-
Campbell back after four years in Wallabies team to face Ireland
-
Most Asia markets down as tech firms take fresh blow
-
Kane saves England as USA, Belgium reach last 16
-
South Korean school baseball team suspended over 'Tank Day' chants
-
Budding chefs cook up new career at China's BBQ academy
-
Ceuzany, Cape Verde's golden voice with volcanic emotion
-
One stitch at a time: Artist's mission to recreate the Bayeux Tapestry
-
Balogun scores and sees red as US beat Bosnia 2-0
-
Deadly Russian barrage pounds Ukraine capital
Dubious AI detectors drive 'pay-to-humanize' scam
Feed an Iranian news dispatch or a literary classic into some text detectors, and they return the same verdict: AI-generated. Then comes the pitch: pay to "humanize" the writing, a pattern experts say bears the hallmarks of a scam.
As AI falsehoods explode across social media, often outpacing the capacity of professional fact-checkers, bogus detectors risk adding another layer of deception to an already fractured information ecosystem.
While even reliable AI detectors can produce false results, researchers say a crop of fraudulent tools has emerged online, easily weaponized to discredit authentic content and tarnish reputations.
AFP's fact-checkers identified three such text detectors that claim to estimate what percentage is AI-generated. The tools -- prompted in four languages -- not only misidentified authentic text as AI-generated but also attempted to monetize those errors.
One detector, JustDone AI, processed a human-written report about the US-Iran war and wrongly concluded it contained "88% AI content." It then offered to scrub any trace of AI for a fee.
"Your AI text is humanizing," the site claimed, leading to a page where "100% unique text" was locked behind a paywall charging up to $9.99.
Two other tools -- TextGuard and Refinely -- produced similar false positives and sought to monetize them.
- 'Scams' -
AFP presented its findings to all three detectors.
"Our system operates using modern AI models, and the results it provides are considered accurate within our technology," TextGuard's support team told AFP.
"At the same time, we cannot guarantee or compare results with other systems."
JustDone also reiterated that "no AI detector can guarantee 100 percent accuracy."
It acknowledged the free version of its AI detector "may provide less precise results" due to "high demand and the use of a lighter model designed for quick access."
Echoing AFP's findings, one user on a review platform complained that "even with 100% human-written material, JustDone still flags it as AI."
AFP fed the tools multiple human-written samples -- in Dutch, Greek, Hungarian, and English. All were wrongly flagged as having high AI content, including passages from an acclaimed 1916 Hungarian classic.
The tools returned AI flags regardless of input -- even for nonsensical text.
JustDone and Refinely appeared to operate even without an internet connection, suggesting their results may be scripted rather than genuine technical analysis.
"These are not AI detectors but scams to sell a 'humanizing' tool that will often return what we call 'tortured phrases'" -- unrelated jargon or nonsensical alternatives -- Debora Weber-Wulff, a Germany-based academic who has researched detection tools, told AFP.
- 'Liar's dividend' -
Illustrating how such tools can be used to discredit individuals, pro‑government influencers in Hungary claimed earlier this year that a document outlining the opposition's election campaign had been entirely created by AI.
To support the unfounded allegation, they circulated screenshots on social media showing results from JustDone.
The tools tested by AFP sought to lure students and academics as clients, with two of them claiming their users came from top institutions such as Cornell University.
Cornell University told AFP it "does not have any established relations with AI detector companies."
"Generative AI does provide an increased risk that students may use it to submit work that is not their own," the university said.
"Unfortunately, it is unlikely that detection technologies will provide a workable solution to this problem. It can be very difficult to accurately detect AI-generated content."
Fact-checkers, including those from AFP, often rely on AI visual detection tools developed by experts, which typically look for hidden watermarks and other digital clues.
However, they too can sometimes produce errors, making it necessary to supplement their findings with additional evidence such as open-source data.
The stakes are high as false readings from unreliable detectors threaten to erode trust in AI verification broadly -- and feed a disinformation tactic researchers have dubbed the "liar's dividend": dismissing authentic content as AI fabrications.
"We often report on misinformers and other hoaxsters using AI to fabricate false images and videos," said Waqar Rizvi from the misinformation tracker NewsGuard.
"Now, (we are) monitoring the opposite, but no less insidious phenomenon: claims that a visual was created by AI when in fact, it's authentic."
burs-ac/dw
P.Keller--VB