-
Six candidates to lead UN take stage for televised debate
-
Salman Rushdie testifies at knife attacker's US terror trial
-
King Charles opens slimmed down Commonwealth Games in Glasgow
-
World Bank confirms plan to phase out China lending by 2031
-
US unveils new tariffs on 60 partners as Trump rebuilds trade agenda
-
US panel backs trendy peptides despite safety concerns
-
WNBA viral star Cunningham wades into trans athletes row
-
Justice Dept withdraws NY Times subpoenas over Trump plane report
-
Hearn dismisses Fury talk of Joshua no-show for super fight
-
Barcelona's De Jong returns from World Cup with torn ligament
-
'Like a war zone': France evacuates 20,000 due to wildfires
-
Albania police teargas protesters against Trump-linked resort
-
Ships avoid Ukrainian grain ports after Russian attacks
-
US panel says to loosen restrictions on popular peptide despite safety concerns
-
Oil passes $100 a barrel again: why it's more serious this time
-
Verstappen swerves around future questions
-
Who are the six candidates vying to lead the UN?
-
EU renews online child sex abuse detection powers
-
Hamilton proud of recovery after hitting rock bottom a year ago
-
Airbus, Boeing fly in different directions at Farnborough
-
Carapaz eyes polkadot mountains jersey after stage win
-
Bab al-Mandeb Strait: another key oil shipping route under threat
-
Fields medal awarded to four young mathematicians
-
Deadly wildfires in Europe force thousands to flee
-
Carapaz claims Tour de France stage as Pogacar loses key team-mate
-
NATO to overhaul European fuel pipeline network
-
Alonso welcomes Aston Martin upgrade, warns against unreal expectations
-
US trade envoy to make tariff announcement as 10% duty soon expires
-
Anderson declares Man City 'kings of Manchester' after £116 mn move
-
Trump stuns Saudis by pinning nuclear deal to Israel ties
-
Relieved Russell says Mercedes have solved his power problems mystery
-
Tough day for Ubisoft stock topped with weaker revenues
-
Oil soars above $100 as Middle East fears grow
-
Swelling jet fuel costs hit American Airlines outlook
-
Venezuelans turn to scrap collecting in quake-hit beach 'paradise'
-
Carapaz climbs unopposed to Tour de France 18th stage win
-
Heptathlon champion Johnson-Thompson joins list of Commonwealth Games absentees
-
Sooryavanshi hits maiden 50 as India thump Zimbabwe in T20
-
Nigeria's Dangote raises $2.5bn to expand Africa's largest refinery
-
ECB opens door to September rate-hike as Iran war flares up
-
Oil soars to $100 on fresh Mideast attacks
-
World Bank estimates Venezuela quakes caused $19.6 bn in damage
-
Coal-fired power generation rising globally on Mideast war: IEA
-
Italy's far-right line up to defend jeweller who killed robbers
-
Premier League champions Arsenal sign Greece winger Tzolis from Brugge
-
AI-led boom in IPOs raises concerns about a bust
-
French Jewish DJ sues after activists disrupt gig: lawyer
-
Klopp expected to be named new Germany coach on Friday
-
Venice film festival promises Pattinson, Oasis and Musk doc
-
ECB holds rates as Iran war flare-up threatens to drive prices higher
Prince Harry takes on the press - under oath
Prince Harry's appearance at the High Court in London on Tuesday was a world away from the gentle questioning of a friendly interviewer on prime-time television.
Instead, King Charles III's younger son was up against lawyer Andrew Green, King's Counsel, a courteous but relentless inquisitor representing British tabloid publishers Mirror Group Newspapers.
Harry and his American wife Meghan have made much of speaking their truth about their struggles inside the royal family since they left for the United States in early 2020.
But in the witness box of court 15 of the Rolls Building, a modern annexe to the Gothic halls of the Royal Courts of Justice, the goal was hard facts to support his claim of illegal practices.
"I swear by almighty God that the evidence I shall give shall be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth," Harry swore on the Bible.
Harry's testimony is the first by a senior royal to be given in court since the 1890s. His lawyer, David Sherborne, was keen to ensure the court had the correct form of address.
He was first referred to as "Your Royal Highness" but Harry, dressed in a dark business suit, said he preferred "Prince Harry".
Then Green stepped up to cross-examine him on his written witness statement but not before apologising on behalf of MGN for one case of unlawful activity.
"MGN unreservedly apologises to you for that, it should never have happened and it will never happen again," he said.
The apology is the only one MGN has made. It disputes Harry's claim that its newspapers engaged in illegal information-gathering, including phone hacking, for stories about the prince.
- Details -
Green went over details, questioning Harry on the substance of his allegations that about 140 articles published by MGN titles between 1996 and 2010 contained information gleaned by unlawful methods.
Thirty-three articles have been selected for consideration at the trial.
Had Harry read them? How did he know the information was obtained illegally? he asked.
Harry wasn't sure as they dated back 20 years. Possibly, he said. Maybe, he added, as he explained how he was relentlessly targeted from a young age.
"I've experienced hostility from the press since I was born," he told the court.
It had made him paranoid and cost him close friends and relationships.
"Your circle starts to shrink," he said.
Green asked Harry to explain what he meant in his written testimony that some journalists had "blood on their hands".
"Some of the editors and journalists that are responsible for causing a lot of pain, upset and in some cases, speaking personally, death," he said, referring to his mother, Princess Diana.
She was killed in a 1997 car crash in Paris, while being pursued by paparazzi.
But Harry did not name any specific journalist, explaining that the phrase was aimed "more broadly towards the press".
Questioned about an article from 2002 that claimed he smoked cannabis, Harry took aim at his own family for cooperating with the newspaper.
Green suggested it was legitimately in the public interest, as Harry was the son of the future king and in the line of succession.
There was a difference "between public interest and what interests the public", the prince replied.
"Every element of it was distressing," he said.
O.Krause--BTB