-
'We need help': Venezuelans furious at slow official response to quakes
-
World's largest particle smasher halts for upgrade to boost hunt for dark matter
-
Venus Williams relishes 'very special' Wimbledon reunion with sister Serena
-
Ex-Olympic medallist Canderloro elected French Ice Sports chief
-
Ravindra leads New Zealand rally in England finale after Archer's double strike
-
Prince Harry and family to stay at royal residences on UK visit
-
Wimbledon 'towel thief' Swiatek back on the trophy hunt
-
'Why not?': Cape Verde eye seismic World Cup shock against Argentina
-
Venezuela earthquake deaths near 1,000, with millions more in need
-
Russell snatches controversial pole in Austria after Verstappen crash
-
French Open champs head to Wimbledon wrestling with new-found status
-
Davidovich Fokina wins in Mallorca for first ATP title
-
Budapest Pride marchers push for equality after reversed ban
-
Sabalenka urges Grand Slams to 'get it done' in prize money boycott row
-
Russell snatches pole, Antonelli fourth for Austria GP grid
-
Russell snatches pole as Verstappen, Antonelli fourth for Austria GP grid
-
Broos smiles and snarls before South Africa's historic World Cup match
-
Smith and supersub Foulkes strike for New Zealand in England finale
-
Newborn baby rescued from rubble of Venezuela quake
-
Supersub Foulkes strike for New Zealand in England finale
-
Raducanu halts practice session to put Wimbledon bid in doubt
-
Wolff says Russell will be at Mercedes next season
-
Keys beats Maria to clinch third Eastbourne title
-
Djokovic inspired by Serena as he targets history at Wimbledon
-
Thousands ride through Rome as Vespa celebrates 80 years
-
Stokes falls cheaply as England collapse in New Zealand decider
-
Sinner ready for Wimbledon defence despite lack of time on grass
-
Russell bounces back to beat Antonelli in final practice
-
Records tumble as European heatwave moves east
-
Iran says US violated peace deal as both sides trade fire
-
England, Portugal eye top spots as World Cup group stages wrap up
-
Injured Australian pair Leckie, Italiano out of World Cup
-
US, Iran trade strikes putting new strain on Middle East truce
-
Farmers fear drought as Italy's longest river runs dry
-
Thousands expected as Vespa celebrates 80 years in Rome
-
Budapest Pride to push for equality after reversed ban
-
Pino, Williams injuries mar Spain's World Cup progress
-
World Cup fans get taste of American life -- at the mall
-
'Struggle continues' in Bolivia's Morales heartland
-
World Cup turns New York's Times Square into global fan hub
-
Bielsa accepts blame for World Cup exit, but says Uruguay deserved more
-
Lebanon, Israel and US sign trilateral framework pact
-
Uruguay crash out of World Cup as Spain avoid Argentina clash
-
Cape Verde extend World Cup fairytale to set up Argentina meeting
-
Swiss glaciers facing drastic loss from heatwave: expert
-
Messi to start dead-rubber World Cup group match on bench
-
Trump unveils new US passport -- with picture of himself
-
US and Iran trade strikes putting new strain on Mideast ceasefire
-
Hat-trick hero Dembele displays Ballon d'Or brilliance for France at World Cup
-
Maple Leafs make teen McKenna top pick in NHL Draft
Trump's order on nuclear testing: what we know
President Donald Trump has ignited a firestorm of controversy and confusion with his announcement that the United States will begin nuclear weapons testing.
It's unclear whether he was referring to testing weapons systems -- which the United States already does -- or actually conducting nuclear explosions, which only US arch-foe North Korea has carried out in the 21st century.
Below, AFP examines what Trump has said, the state of current US testing, and what it would take to resume explosive tests.
- What Trump said -
Trump said in a social media post that he had instructed the Defense Department "to start testing our Nuclear Weapons on an equal basis" with Russia and China.
However, neither of those countries are confirmed to have carried out recent explosive testing, and it is the Department of Energy that is responsible for the US nuclear stockpile.
The president subsequently told journalists on Air Force One that "they seem to all be doing nuclear testing," and that "we halted it many years ago but with others doing testing I think it is appropriate we do also."
He offered no details on the nature of the testing he had ordered.
- Current US testing -
The United States conducted the world's first nuclear test in July 1945 and used two nuclear weapons against Japan near the end of WWII.
It has carried out more than 1,000 explosive nuclear tests in total -- most recently in 1992 with a 20-kiloton underground detonation at the Nevada Nuclear Security Site.
That year, Congress passed a temporary moratorium on underground nuclear tests unless a foreign state conducted one, which has since occurred. Washington had already agreed not to conduct tests in the atmosphere, outer space and underwater as part of the Limited Test Ban Treaty, which it has been a party to since 1963.
The United States has also been a signatory since 1996 to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, which bans all atomic test explosions, but the Senate has yet to ratify it.
In the absence of explosive testing, the United States ensures its arsenal's reliability through the so-called Stockpile Stewardship Program, which includes "a wide range of scientific activities, from modeling and simulation to subcritical nuclear experiments," according to the US National Nuclear Security Administration.
"This program allows us to assess and certify the stockpile with extraordinary confidence," it says.
Washington also periodically tests its nuclear delivery systems such as intercontinental ballistic missiles.
The US military launched an unarmed Minuteman III missile earlier this year, with the Space Force saying at the time that the United States had carried out more than 300 similar tests overall.
- Resuming explosive testing -
The president has the authority to authorize explosive tests, and Washington's forces have "the capability to resume testing within 24-36 months of a presidential decision to do so," the US Congressional Research Service says.
It notes that a 2012 study found that "the response time for resuming underground explosive testing is driven more by compliance with environmental, health, and safety regulations than by the technical testing requirements or the need to restore equipment and facilities."
Doreen Horschig, a fellow with the Project on Nuclear Issues at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the US National Nuclear Security Administration would be able to "get the test site ready within six to 10 months for a very basic underground test."
"The timeframe is much longer if you want to test new warheads and new capabilities," Horschig said.
But she also noted that there is likely to be political opposition to a resumption of testing "from both sides of the political camps" in the United States, while "our allies (also) do not see a need for (a) return to testing."
K.Hofmann--VB