-
Keys into Melbourne third round with Sinner, Djokovic primed
-
Bangladesh launches campaigns for first post-Hasina polls
-
Stocks track Wall St rally as Trump cools tariff threats in Davos
-
South Korea's economy grew just 1% in 2025, lowest in five years
-
Snowboard champ Hirano suffers fractures ahead of Olympics
-
'They poisoned us': grappling with deadly impact of nuclear testing
-
Keys blows hot and cold before making Australian Open third round
-
Philippine journalist found guilty of terror financing
-
Greenlanders doubtful over Trump resolution
-
Real Madrid top football rich list as Liverpool surge
-
'One Battle After Another,' 'Sinners' tipped to top Oscar noms
-
Higher heating costs add to US affordability crunch
-
Eight stadiums to host 2027 Rugby World Cup matches in Australia
-
Plastics everywhere, and the myth that made it possible
-
Interim Venezuela leader to visit US
-
Australia holds day of mourning for Bondi Beach shooting victims
-
Liverpool cruise as Bayern reach Champions League last 16
-
Fermin Lopez brace leads Barca to win at Slavia Prague
-
Newcastle pounce on PSV errors to boost Champions League last-16 bid
-
Fermin Lopez brace hands Barca win at Slavia Prague
-
Kane double fires Bayern into Champions League last 16
-
Newcastle pounce on PSV errors to close in on Champions League last 16
-
In Davos speech, Trump repeatedly refers to Greenland as 'Iceland'
-
Liverpool see off Marseille to close on Champions League last 16
-
Caicedo strikes late as Chelsea end Pafos resistance
-
US Republicans begin push to hold Clintons in contempt over Epstein
-
Trump says agreed 'framework' for US deal over Greenland
-
Algeria's Zidane and Belghali banned over Nigeria AFCON scuffle
-
Iran says 3,117 killed during protests, activists fear 'far higher' toll
-
Atletico frustrated in Champions League draw at Galatasaray
-
Israel says struck Syria-Lebanon border crossings used by Hezbollah
-
Snapchat settles to avoid social media addiction trial
-
'Extreme cold': Winter storm forecast to slam huge expanse of US
-
Jonathan Anderson reimagines aristocrats in second Dior Homme collection
-
Former England rugby captain George to retire in 2027
-
Israel launches wave of fresh strikes on Lebanon
-
Ubisoft unveils details of big restructuring bet
-
Abhishek fireworks help India beat New Zealand in T20 opener
-
Huge lines, laughs and gasps as Trump lectures Davos elite
-
Trump rules out 'force' against Greenland but demands talks
-
Stocks steadier as Trump rules out force to take Greenland
-
World's oldest cave art discovered in Indonesia
-
US hip-hop label Def Jam launches China division in Chengdu
-
Dispersed Winter Olympics sites 'have added complexity': Coventry
-
Man City players to refund fans after Bodo/Glimt debacle
-
France's Lactalis recalls baby formula over toxin
-
Pakistan rescuers scour blaze site for dozens missing
-
Keenan return to Irish squad boosts Farrell ahead of 6 Nations
-
US Treasury chief accuses Fed chair of 'politicising' central bank
-
Trump rules out force against Greenland but demands 'immediate' talks
Trump's order on nuclear testing: what we know
President Donald Trump has ignited a firestorm of controversy and confusion with his announcement that the United States will begin nuclear weapons testing.
It's unclear whether he was referring to testing weapons systems -- which the United States already does -- or actually conducting nuclear explosions, which only US arch-foe North Korea has carried out in the 21st century.
Below, AFP examines what Trump has said, the state of current US testing, and what it would take to resume explosive tests.
- What Trump said -
Trump said in a social media post that he had instructed the Defense Department "to start testing our Nuclear Weapons on an equal basis" with Russia and China.
However, neither of those countries are confirmed to have carried out recent explosive testing, and it is the Department of Energy that is responsible for the US nuclear stockpile.
The president subsequently told journalists on Air Force One that "they seem to all be doing nuclear testing," and that "we halted it many years ago but with others doing testing I think it is appropriate we do also."
He offered no details on the nature of the testing he had ordered.
- Current US testing -
The United States conducted the world's first nuclear test in July 1945 and used two nuclear weapons against Japan near the end of WWII.
It has carried out more than 1,000 explosive nuclear tests in total -- most recently in 1992 with a 20-kiloton underground detonation at the Nevada Nuclear Security Site.
That year, Congress passed a temporary moratorium on underground nuclear tests unless a foreign state conducted one, which has since occurred. Washington had already agreed not to conduct tests in the atmosphere, outer space and underwater as part of the Limited Test Ban Treaty, which it has been a party to since 1963.
The United States has also been a signatory since 1996 to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, which bans all atomic test explosions, but the Senate has yet to ratify it.
In the absence of explosive testing, the United States ensures its arsenal's reliability through the so-called Stockpile Stewardship Program, which includes "a wide range of scientific activities, from modeling and simulation to subcritical nuclear experiments," according to the US National Nuclear Security Administration.
"This program allows us to assess and certify the stockpile with extraordinary confidence," it says.
Washington also periodically tests its nuclear delivery systems such as intercontinental ballistic missiles.
The US military launched an unarmed Minuteman III missile earlier this year, with the Space Force saying at the time that the United States had carried out more than 300 similar tests overall.
- Resuming explosive testing -
The president has the authority to authorize explosive tests, and Washington's forces have "the capability to resume testing within 24-36 months of a presidential decision to do so," the US Congressional Research Service says.
It notes that a 2012 study found that "the response time for resuming underground explosive testing is driven more by compliance with environmental, health, and safety regulations than by the technical testing requirements or the need to restore equipment and facilities."
Doreen Horschig, a fellow with the Project on Nuclear Issues at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the US National Nuclear Security Administration would be able to "get the test site ready within six to 10 months for a very basic underground test."
"The timeframe is much longer if you want to test new warheads and new capabilities," Horschig said.
But she also noted that there is likely to be political opposition to a resumption of testing "from both sides of the political camps" in the United States, while "our allies (also) do not see a need for (a) return to testing."
K.Hofmann--VB