-
Tech-fuelled rally fizzles as oil prices rise
-
High winds hamper firefighting efforts in western Turkey
-
Chelsea's Mudryk cleared to play after doping ban appeal
-
Howe resigns as Newcastle boss
-
A side of oysters for France's flat-out firefighters
-
Full-scale tour will benefit All Blacks, says coach Rennie
-
England cricket chief Key refuses to rule out Stokes return
-
US Fed dissenters call for rate hikes over sustained inflation
-
New blazes in Greece as strong winds hamper firefighting
-
Trump and far-right seize on Spanish migration crisis
-
Springboks star Feinberg-Mngomezulu back for Argentina Test
-
Hamas agrees to disarm under Trump plan
-
Shops closed, businesses quiet as Spain's Ceuta faces migrant surge
-
French, Italian winegrowers face earliest ever harvest
-
Chelsea fined £10mn, handed suspended transfer ban for breaching agent rules
-
Alarm over climate-linked low level of German waterways
-
Residents defend Spain’s ancient 'El Abuelo' tree from flames
-
UK court rejects challenge against new Chinese embassy in London
-
Forever chemicals and pesticides: what to know
-
New York sues online prediction markets giant Kalshi
-
Spaniard Santi Denia takes over as Czech Republic coach
-
Commerzbank agrees to talks with UniCredit after two-year standoff
-
EU races to contain new migrant crisis as thousands cross into Spain's N. Africa enclave
-
A rumour, a rush: chaos at Morocco border with Spain's Ceuta
-
Profits surge at US oil giant amid Iran war supply shock
-
Fornaro Legal Releases Guidance to Help Businesses Maintain Clear Ownership Records During Growth
-
Bodies of four climbers found near Pakistan avalanche site: police
-
Hamas agrees to disarm: what are the challenges ahead?
-
UK court dismisses challenge against new Chinese embassy in London
-
Turkey fights to last major blaze inland from Bodrum
-
Stock markets rally on tech rebound
-
Japan probe made closest-ever asteroid flyby: space agency
-
Tyla drops Lagos show as South Africa, Nigeria row over immigration
-
Wildberries: 'Russia's Amazon' targeted by Ukraine
-
BP seeks to sell North Sea business as UK faces drilling dilemma
-
FIFA plan hit by senior advisor resigning, AFC opposition
-
Pro-Kremlin commentator denounces 'censorship' in France
-
Kosovo war crimes trial opens against fugitive Serbs
-
AC Milan 'in tears' at death of Italian football legend Baresi
-
Bodies of four climbers recovered near northern Pakistan avalanche site, police say
-
France, Spain assess scorched terrain as new wildfires threaten other regions
-
Thousands cross into Spain's north Africa enclave in new migrant crisis
-
Нооша Аубель під тиском: мерія Потсдама між самостійними кроками та скандалом із дитячими садками
-
Noosha Aubel under pressure: Potsdam City Hall caught between going it alone and the nursery scandal
-
Missing climber Nirmal Purja redefined mountaineering
-
UK singer Boy George pulls out of musical after pro-Israel song backlash
-
British oil giant BP aims to sell North Sea business
-
Chipmaker Kioxia reports AI-driven 45-fold surge in quarterly net profit
-
Sony hikes profit outlook on strong gaming earnings
-
Wildfire rages on Crete as strong winds hamper firefighting
Republicans take aim at Biden with 'fact check' website
Just before Joe Biden announced his much-anticipated 2024 re-election bid Tuesday, his Republican opponents took aim at the US president in an unexpected way – they rolled out a website to "fact check" him.
The move underlines efforts on both sides of the political aisle to lob salvos at rivals using the fact-checking format, a move analysts say risks undermining trust in non-partisan debunkers of misinformation.
The Republican National Committee unveiled factcheckbiden.com, a website dedicated solely to exposing in real time what the party called the president's "lies."
"The RNC will continue to hold Biden accountable for his lies, and in November 2024, the American people will too," RNC chairwoman Ronna McDaniel said in a statement.
The website was launched just a day before Biden, a Democrat, threw his hat in the ring for a second presidential term, setting the stage for a possible rematch against Donald Trump.
Trump's Republican supporters promoted the website on social media as the "Biden White House's new least favorite website."
The site appeared to push Republican talking points, with a blizzard of posts mixing factual links with personal opinions -- something professional fact-checkers typically steer clear of.
Remarks made by Biden were flagged as "personal lies," "made up stories" and, in one instance, a "really, really weird lie."
"This sounds like a fairly standard campaign tactic, to set up a website to 'fact check' statements by your opponent," Joshua Tucker, co-director of the NYU Center for Social Media and Politics, told AFP.
"I doubt that mainstream media sources are going to confuse an RNC site fact-checking Biden for a non-partisan or professional fact checking site," Tucker added.
- 'Muddying the waters' -
The Republican move mirrors similar efforts by the Democrats.
The Democratic National Committee has established a "war room" that routinely sends out email newsletters with "fact-checks" or statements blasting Republican politicians.
During a presidential debate in 2016, in which Hillary Clinton was pitted against Trump, the Democrat's personal website ran a live "fact-check" of her opponent.
Clinton urged viewers of the debate to visit the segment called "Literally Trump" to witness the facts – a call that attracted millions of hits in a short span, according to US media.
Fact-checking by professional media organizations was a perpetually frenetic exercise during Trump's 2017 to 2021 presidency, when his every word and tweet – often riddled with inaccuracies – were heavily scrutinized.
Republicans appear to have "serious concerns" about the fairness of professional fact-checking organizations, according to a 2019 survey by the Pew Research Center. Seven in ten Republicans say fact-checkers tend to favor one side, compared with roughly three in ten Democrats, the survey said.
That likely explains the Republican push into debunking.
"The incorporation of 'fact-checking' language into clearly partisan activity could have the effect of muddying the waters on the trustworthiness -- and objectivity -- of non-partisan fact checking organizations," said Tucker.
"If 'fact checking' in some cases means 'this is our partisan opinion,' then it may become increasingly difficult to know when fact-checking really is a (neutral) activity."
B.Shevchenko--BTB