-
No.1 Korda charges into share of LPGA Mexico lead
-
Young fires 67 to seize commanding PGA lead at Doral
-
US appeals court temporarily halts mail delivery of abortion pill
-
Joy for Norris in Miami as McLaren end Mercedes run
-
Leclerc offers hope to Ferrari fans in Miami
-
US to withdraw about 5,000 troops from Germany
-
'No going back' for Colombia's workers as the right eyes return
-
Norris on sprint pole as McLaren shine again
-
Venezuelan protesters call government wage hike a joke
-
Leeds beat Burnley to virtually secure Premier League survival
-
Gridlock as pandemic treaty talks fail to finish
-
S&P 500, Nasdaq end at fresh records on tech earnings strength
-
Immersive art: museum-goers in bikinis dive into Cezanne
-
Gaza activists disperse after flotilla halted by Israel off Crete
-
US sanctions are 'collective punishment,' says Cuba during May 1 marches
-
Delhi end slump with team-record chase against Rajasthan
-
Trump says will raise US tariffs on EU cars to 25%
-
AI actors and writers not eligible for Oscars: Academy
-
Rebels take key military base in Mali's north
-
ExxonMobil CEO sees chance of higher oil prices as earnings dip
-
Leclerc on top for Ferrari ahead of Verstappen and Piastri
-
Trump says 'not satisfied' with new Iran proposal
-
After Madonna and Lady Gaga, Shakira set for Rio beach mega-gig
-
Trump says will raise US tariffs on EU cars, trucks to 25%
-
Godon raises game to take Romandie stage and revenge over leader Pogacar
-
Celtic's O'Neill expects no let-up from Hibs despite fans' feelings
-
Pope names former undocumented migrant as US bishop
-
Javelin star Kitaguchi teams up with Czech legend Zelezny
-
Sawe sub-2hr marathon captured 'global imagination' says Coe
-
King Charles gets warm welcome in Bermuda after whirlwind US visit
-
Sinner shines to beat Fils, reach Madrid Open final
-
UK court clears comedy writer of damaging transgender activist's phone
-
Was LIV Golf an expensive failure for Saudis? Not everyone thinks so
-
Coe hails IOC gender testing decision
-
McInnes wants Tynecastle in 'full glory' for Hearts title charge
-
McFarlane says troubled Chelsea still attractive to potential managers
-
Man Utd boss Carrick relishes 'special' Liverpool rivalry
-
Baguettes take centre stage on France's Labour Day
-
Spurs must banish 'loser' mentality despite injury woes, says De Zerbi
-
Arsenal must manage emotions of title race says Arteta
-
Nepal temple celebrates return of stolen Buddha statue
-
US Fed official says rate hikes may be needed if inflation surges
-
Fixture pile-up no excuse for Man City in title race: Guardiola
-
Iran offers new proposal amid stalled US peace talks
-
Gulf countries' plans to bypass Hormuz still far off, experts warn
-
Luis Enrique says 'unique' PSG-Bayern first leg could have gone either way
-
Rebels take key military camp in Mali's north
-
Turkish police fire tear gas, arrest hundreds at Istanbul May Day rallies
-
Lufthansa apologises for lost Oscar after US airport security row
-
French hub monitors Hormuz tensions from afar
Climate change cases surge as courts become environment battleground
A quarter of all climate change-related legal cases since the 1980s were filed in the last two years, according to new research Thursday showing surging litigation targeting governments, fossil fuel firms and a growing array of other companies.
The report, which underscores the rising importance of the courts in climate action, comes on the same day that the United States Supreme Court ruled that the government's key environmental agency cannot issue broad limits on greenhouse gases in a blow to climate policy and environment protections.
From legal efforts to steer governments to do more to curb emissions, to court action over companies' misleading green claims, the number, scope and ambitions of climate litigation is expanding, say experts from the Grantham Research Institute at the London School of Economics.
Their report found that of the 2,000 or so legal cases filed since 1986, 475 were started since the beginning of 2020.
"We're likely to see more and more growth," said report co-author Catherine Higham, a Policy Analyst at the Grantham Research Institute.
She added that there is an increasing number of cases where the claimants aim to bring about broad shifts in policies or behaviour.
Most cases are brought against governments, with perhaps the most successful being the landmark 2019 ruling that saw a Dutch Supreme Court ruled that the Netherlands should make more ambitious cuts to its emissions.
Higham said the overwhelming consensus in climate science and broad international agreement on the severe challenges posed by global warming have shifted the legal battleground to focus less on whether governments should act and more on how.
"It's actually very rare at the moment for a government to challenge the underlying climate science," she told AFP.
The report found a growing number of cases targeting the production and consumptions of oil, coal and gas, adding that legal action has played an "important role" in the move toward phasing out fossil fuels.
More and more cases are being filed in the Global South, the report said, with claimants often challenging the development of fossil fuel projects that would "lock in" dependence on carbon pollution.
Legal action against other types of businesses is also on the rise, with more than half of cases involving corporate defendants in 2021 filed against firms in other sectors, like food and agriculture, transport, plastics and finance.
- Chilling effect -
But resorting to the courts can go the other way too, with litigants challenging the introduction of regulations or policies that would lead to greenhouse gas emissions reductions.
There is rising concern that governments could be sued for trillions of dollars by fossil fuel companies seeking compensation for lost revenue and stranded assets.
"There is a potential for these cases to have a significant chilling impact on regulation," said Higham.
Governments could argue that firms have been aware for decades of the need to transition from fossil fuels, she said
It is too soon to say how this would play out before boards of arbitration, she added.
"But it is certainly true that whether it's the Supreme Court of the US, or it's these arbitral tribunals, courts do have huge potential influence over the direction of climate policy, and that that can go either way," she said.
M.Furrer--BTB