-
Russian volcano puts on display in latest eruption
-
Thailand uses contraceptive vaccine to limit wild elephant births
-
Djokovic gets lucky to join Pegula, Rybakina in Melbourne semi-finals
-
Trump says to 'de-escalate' Minneapolis, as aide questions agents' 'protocol'
-
'Extremely lucky' Djokovic into Melbourne semi-finals as Musetti retires
-
'Animals in a zoo': Players back Gauff call for more privacy
-
Starmer heads to China to defend 'pragmatic' partnership
-
Uganda's Quidditch players with global dreams
-
'Hard to survive': Kyiv's elderly shiver after Russian attacks on power and heat
-
South Korea's ex-first lady jailed for 20 months for taking bribes
-
Polish migrants return home to a changed country
-
Dutch tech giant ASML posts bumper profits, eyes bright AI future
-
South Korea's ex-first lady jailed for 20 months for corruption
-
Minnesota congresswoman unbowed after attacked with liquid
-
Backlash as Australia kills dingoes after backpacker death
-
Brazil declares acai a national fruit to ward off 'biopiracy'
-
Anisimova 'loses her mind' after Melbourne quarter-final exit
-
Home hope Goggia on medal mission at Milan-Cortina Winter Olympics
-
Omar attacked in Minneapolis after Trump vows to 'de-escalate'
-
Pistons escape Nuggets rally, Thunder roll Pelicans
-
Dominant Pegula sets up Australian Open semi-final against Rybakina
-
'Animals in a zoo': Swiatek backs Gauff call for more privacy
-
Japan PM's tax giveaway roils markets and worries voters
-
Amid Ukraine war fallout, fearful Chechen women seek escape route
-
Rybakina surges into Melbourne semis as Djokovic takes centre stage
-
Dollar struggles to recover from losses after Trump comments
-
Greenland blues to Delhi red carpet: EU finds solace in India
-
Will the EU ban social media for children in 2026?
-
Netherlands faces 'test case' climate verdict over Caribbean island
-
Rybakina stuns Swiatek to reach Australian Open semi-finals
-
US ouster of Maduro nightmare scenario for Kim: N. Korean ex-diplomat
-
Svitolina credits mental health break for reaching Melbourne semis
-
Japan's Olympic ice icons inspire new skating generation
-
Safe nowhere: massacre at Mexico football field sows despair
-
North Korea to soon unveil 'next-stage' nuclear plans, Kim says
-
French ex-senator found guilty of drugging lawmaker
-
US Fed set to pause rate cuts as it defies Trump pressure
-
Sleeping with one eye open: Venezuelans reel from US strikes
-
Venezuela's acting president says US unfreezing sanctioned funds
-
KPop Demon Hunters star to open Women's Asian Cup
-
Trump warns of 'bad things' if Republicans lose midterms
-
Russian strikes in Ukraine kill 12, target passenger train
-
With Maduro gone, Venezuelan opposition figure gets back to work
-
Celebrities call for action against US immigration raids
-
Rubio to warn Venezuela leader of Maduro's fate if defiant
-
Denver QB Nix 'predisposed' to ankle injury says coach
-
Lula, Macron push for stronger UN to face Trump 'Board of Peace'
-
Prass stunner helps Hoffenheim go third, Leipzig held at Pauli
-
Swiss Meillard wins final giant slalom before Olympics
-
CERN chief upbeat on funding for new particle collider
Climate change cases surge as courts become environment battleground
A quarter of all climate change-related legal cases since the 1980s were filed in the last two years, according to new research Thursday showing surging litigation targeting governments, fossil fuel firms and a growing array of other companies.
The report, which underscores the rising importance of the courts in climate action, comes on the same day that the United States Supreme Court ruled that the government's key environmental agency cannot issue broad limits on greenhouse gases in a blow to climate policy and environment protections.
From legal efforts to steer governments to do more to curb emissions, to court action over companies' misleading green claims, the number, scope and ambitions of climate litigation is expanding, say experts from the Grantham Research Institute at the London School of Economics.
Their report found that of the 2,000 or so legal cases filed since 1986, 475 were started since the beginning of 2020.
"We're likely to see more and more growth," said report co-author Catherine Higham, a Policy Analyst at the Grantham Research Institute.
She added that there is an increasing number of cases where the claimants aim to bring about broad shifts in policies or behaviour.
Most cases are brought against governments, with perhaps the most successful being the landmark 2019 ruling that saw a Dutch Supreme Court ruled that the Netherlands should make more ambitious cuts to its emissions.
Higham said the overwhelming consensus in climate science and broad international agreement on the severe challenges posed by global warming have shifted the legal battleground to focus less on whether governments should act and more on how.
"It's actually very rare at the moment for a government to challenge the underlying climate science," she told AFP.
The report found a growing number of cases targeting the production and consumptions of oil, coal and gas, adding that legal action has played an "important role" in the move toward phasing out fossil fuels.
More and more cases are being filed in the Global South, the report said, with claimants often challenging the development of fossil fuel projects that would "lock in" dependence on carbon pollution.
Legal action against other types of businesses is also on the rise, with more than half of cases involving corporate defendants in 2021 filed against firms in other sectors, like food and agriculture, transport, plastics and finance.
- Chilling effect -
But resorting to the courts can go the other way too, with litigants challenging the introduction of regulations or policies that would lead to greenhouse gas emissions reductions.
There is rising concern that governments could be sued for trillions of dollars by fossil fuel companies seeking compensation for lost revenue and stranded assets.
"There is a potential for these cases to have a significant chilling impact on regulation," said Higham.
Governments could argue that firms have been aware for decades of the need to transition from fossil fuels, she said
It is too soon to say how this would play out before boards of arbitration, she added.
"But it is certainly true that whether it's the Supreme Court of the US, or it's these arbitral tribunals, courts do have huge potential influence over the direction of climate policy, and that that can go either way," she said.
M.Furrer--BTB