-
Call to add Nazi camps to UNESCO list
-
England cricket chiefs to front up to media over Ashes flop
-
'Miracle': Europe reconnects with lost spacecraft
-
Nigeria 'challenged by terrorism', president says on UK state visit
-
Woltemade deployed too deep to be dangerous at Newcastle, says Nagelsmann
-
Wimbledon expansion plan gets legal boost
-
EU summit fails to rally Orban behind stalled Ukraine loan
-
New Morocco coach praises 'well-deserved' Cup of Nations decision
-
Senegal to appeal CAF Africa Cup of Nations decision
-
'Mixing things up': Nagelsmann goes for flexibility in new Germany squad
-
Record-setter Hodgkinson hopes 'fourth time lucky' at world indoors
-
European Central Bank warns of major hit from Mideast war
-
Atletico target Romero says his focus on Spurs' survival bid
-
Karalis hits prime form to threaten Duplantis surprise
-
Freshly returned Mbappe leads France squad for Brazil, Colombia friendlies
-
US earns its lowest-ever score on freedom index
-
Europe's super elite teach English clubs a Champions League lesson
-
What we know about the UK's deadly meningitis outbreak
-
Karl handed Germany debut as Musiala misses out with injury
-
What cargo ships are passing Hormuz strait?
-
Bank of England holds interest rate amid Middle East war
-
'Surreal' for F1 world champion Norris to have Tussauds waxwork
-
Iran hangs three men in first executions over January protests
-
North Korea, Philippines qualify for 2027 Women's World Cup
-
Man Utd boss Carrick expects hard test against resolute Bournemouth
-
Oil prices surge, stocks sink on energy shock fears
-
Alibaba pins hopes on AI as quarterly net profit drops
-
Oil soars 10% after Qatar energy sites hit in Mideast war
-
Iran 'boycotting' USA but not World Cup: football federation chief
-
Tokyo's dazzling cherry blossom season officially begins
-
Iran causes 'extensive' damage to Qatar gas hub, sparks Trump warning
-
Baby monkey Punch acclimatising, making new friends at Japan zoo
-
Labubu creators hope for monster film hit in Sony co-production
-
Crude prices surge, stocks sink amid rising energy shock fears
-
Kings of K-pop: What to know about BTS's comeback
-
Patching the wounds of Kinshasa's street children
-
Thailand's Anutin: Millionaire PM with a populist approach
-
In Seoul square of protest and history, BTS fans welcome grand comeback
-
Hong Kong panel hears safety measures failed on day of deadly fire
-
Trump threatens to destroy Iran's largest gas field
-
Doncic and James power Lakers over Rockets as win streak hits seven
-
Inter continue Serie A title hunt ahead of Italy's date with World Cup destiny
-
Strait of Hormuz blockage drives up Gulf food bills
-
Ahead of election, Danish city mirrors country's challenges
-
Wild possum shelters with plush toys in Australian airport shop
-
Iran missile fire kills 3 Palestinians in West Bank, foreign worker in Israel
-
Asian Games cruise ship and wooden huts will be 'unique experience'
-
Pacific nations fear fuel shortages as Middle East war sends oil prices soaring
-
World indoor athletics championships: five stand-out events
-
Crude prices surge, stocks sink as Iran warns of regional energy strikes
Brazil high court resumes key Indigenous lands case
Brazil's Supreme Court resumed hearings Wednesday in a closely watched case on whether to restrict native peoples' rights to claim their ancestral lands, a key buffer against climate change.
Hundreds of Indigenous protesters, many in traditional feather headdresses, rallied in the capital Brasilia as the court weighed the legality of the so-called "time-frame argument," which holds that native peoples should not have the right to lands where they were not present in 1988, when the current constitution was ratified.
Indigenous groups say that violates their rights, given that many were forced from their ancestral lands, including during the military dictatorship that ruled Brazil from the 1960s to 1980s.
The Supreme Court began hearing the case in 2021, but has adjourned the proceedings several times.
So far, two of the court's 11 justices have sided with the Indigenous plaintiffs, and two against them, one of these a judge who announced his stance on Wednesday.
The proceedings were to resume on Thursday with the remaining seven judges due to state their opinion.
Climate campaigners have joined Indigenous activists in pressing for the court to reject the time-frame argument, given that numerous studies have found that protected Indigenous reservations are one of the best ways to fight deforestation and, with it, global warming.
"The argument ignores our constitutional rights to our ancestral lands, puts existing Indigenous reservations at risk and makes creating new ones unviable," Dinamam Tuxa, coordinator of the Association of Brazil's Indigenous Peoples (APIB), told AFP ahead of the trial.
Indigenous rights groups have dubbed the case the "trial of the century."
The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights said in a statement that a win for the time-frame limitation argument would be "a big setback" for the rights of Indigenous people in Brazil and go against international human rights norms.
The limitation is backed by Brazil's powerful agribusiness lobby, which scored a victory in May when the lower house of Congress passed a bill enshrining the 1988 cutoff in law.
The bill is now working its way through the Senate.
Leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, a self-described ally of Indigenous peoples, is expected to veto the bill if it passes. But Congress, where the agribusiness coalition is a major player, could override a veto.
The case could enter murky legal territory if that happens before the Supreme Court's justices finish delivering their rulings.
The constitution makes no mention of a cutoff date in relation to Indigenous reservations.
Indigenous reservations cover 11.6 percent of Brazil's territory, notably in the Amazon rainforest.
Brazil has around 1.7 million Indigenous inhabitants -- 0.8 percent of the population.
L.Janezki--BTB