-
Clark leads US Open by four with major champs in the hunt
-
Saibari early strike gives Morocco World Cup win over Scotland
-
Archaeologists discover 'never before seen' pre-Hispanic ruins in Mexico
-
Pochettino backs 'high IQ' players to block out World Cup hype
-
James Burrows, prolific innovator in US TV comedies, dead at 85
-
Douglass breaks 50m free world record at Indy Pro Swim
-
World Cup warning with Sweden star Isak 'getting stronger and stronger'
-
'Like China': Cubans welcome reforms but exiles remain skeptical
-
Tunisia coach says 'I am no wizard' after World Cup SOS call
-
USA down Australia to reach World Cup knockout rounds
-
USA beat Australia 2-0 to reach World Cup knockouts
-
Imperious Dupont guides record-breaking Toulouse to Top 14 final
-
Qatar-gifted Air Force One replacement unveiled
-
Venezuelan opposition figure heads to US after transition talks
-
Niemann fires 65 at US Open after upsetting two-shot penalty
-
Canada star Kone to miss rest of World Cup after surgery: team
-
Spain's Yamal says 'too soon' to play full match at World Cup
-
Confident Fitzpatrick makes a run at another US Open title
-
Neymar? He is working remotely at the World Cup, jokes Lula
-
England captain Stokes strikes for Durham as Test recall looms
-
Three-time Stanley Cup champion Toews retires
-
Clark wants to win back fans as well as US Open title
-
Japan wary of fired up and wounded Tunisia for World Cup landmark game
-
Clark leads as fellow major winners charge at US Open
-
'Like a fridge': France cave homes offer lucky few respite from heat
-
Ton-up Nicholls turns the screw for New Zealand against England
-
Hormuz ship traffic climbs after war deal: trackers
-
Sun shines on jockey Lee at Royal Ascot
-
Kane hails World Cup 'Wonderwall' singalong as England highlight
-
Oil edges back up, shares steady after US-Iran talks postponed
-
Sabalenka roars back to make Berlin WTA semis
-
Europe swelters as more heat records set to tumble
-
Narvaez takes Swiss Tour third stage after 100km breakaway
-
'There's no soul': Tony Leung weighs in on AI in filmmaking
-
Europe swelters as temperature records tumble
-
From Versailles to a Swiss mountain: a week of dizzying Iran diplomacy
-
French mountain lodges worry over strained water supply
-
Coach tells S. Korea to move on fast with World Cup knockouts in reach
-
Heatwave hits more than one in two people in France
-
Henry strikes as New Zealand strengthen grip against England
-
Zverev sets up Fritz semi at Halle Open
-
England captain Stokes in action for Durham as Test recall looms
-
Clark stumbles but still leads by two at US Open
-
Moutet fined over x-rated Queen's Club rant
-
Ogura pulls off stunner to top Czech MotoGP practices
-
Outrage in Italy after Trump says Meloni 'begged' for photo op
-
Turkey bars public World Cup screening over university entrance exam
-
From birds to fish, how extreme heat causes wildlife to suffer
-
Ebola spreading 'fast' in DR Congo, warns WHO
-
Trapped on Everest for days, Nepali survivor recounts escape
What we know about how 'forever chemicals' affect health
Invisible, omnipresent "forever chemicals" have been linked to a wide range of serious effects on human health, prompting growing calls for them to be banned.
While there is firm evidence that at least one of the more than 4,000 human-made chemicals called PFAS causes cancer, researchers are still attempting to fully understand their broader impact on health.
Here is what we know so far.
- What are PFAS? -
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are synthetic chemicals that were first developed in the 1940s to withstand intense heat and repel water and grease.
They have since been used in a vast range of household and industrial products including food packaging, make-up, stain-proof fabric, non-stick pots and pans and foam used to fight fires.
Because PFAS take an extremely long time to break down -- earning them the nickname "forever chemicals" -- over the years they have seeped into the soil and groundwater, getting into our food chain and drinking water in the process.
These chemicals have now been detected virtually everywhere on Earth, from the top of Mount Everest to inside human blood and brains.
- Two biggest culprits -
The two most researched PFAS compounds have already been banned or restricted in many countries, though they remain detectable throughout the environment.
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), which was once used to make the non-stick cookware coating Teflon, was in December classified as "carcinogenic to humans" by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
The World Health Organization agency said there is "sufficient evidence" that PFOA gave animals cancer during experiments, as well as "limited evidence" of renal cell and testicular cancer in humans.
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) -- once the key ingredient in the Scotchgard fabric protector -- was meanwhile ruled "possibly carcinogenic to humans".
There was limited proof of cancer in animals but "inadequate evidence regarding cancer in humans", the IARC said.
- Other linked diseases -
More broadly, observational studies have suggested that exposure to PFAS chemicals is associated with an increased rate of cancer, obesity, thyroid, liver and kidney disease, higher cholesterol, low birth weight, infertility and even a lower response to vaccines.
But such observational research cannot prove that the chemicals directly cause these health problems.
And the level of risk can vary greatly depending on the level of PFAS people are exposed to -- almost everyone on Earth is believed to have at least a little PFAS in their bodies.
According to the IARC, most at risk for serious PFAS exposure are people who directly work with the chemicals while making products.
- Question of exposure -
Exactly what level of PFAS exposure is hazardous to health has been a matter of debate.
Previously, guidelines in numerous countries ruled that having less than 100 nanogrammes of PFAS per litre of tap water was enough to protect health.
But the United States has proposed lowering the limit to four nanogrammes of PFOA and PFOS per litre -- and the EU is considering following suit.
Last year, a media investigation found PFAS levels over 100 nanogrammes per litre at 2,100 sites across Europe and the UK.
The level soared over 10,000 nanogrammes at 300 of the sites, according to the investigation carried out by 16 newsrooms.
- 'Chemical whack-a-mole' -
Further complicating the ability of research to comprehend the health effects of PFAS is that new compounds are still being developed.
As manufacturers phase out compounds identified as potentially hazardous, they sometimes simply replace it with another member of the PFAS family that has been studied less, researchers have warned.
Harvard environmental researcher Elsie Sunderland has called this process "chemical whack-a-mole".
- Calls for action -
Environmentalists and health experts across the world have been increasingly sounding the alarm about forever chemicals.
On Thursday, French MP Nicolas Thierry will introduce a bill that -- if passed -- would ban non-essential PFAS in France from 2025.
The European Union is also considering a Europe-wide ban on PFAS from as early as 2026.
- What can you do? -
For people at home, it is nearly impossible to avoid consuming miniscule amounts of PFAS.
But experts recommend reducing contact with non-stick cookware and grease-proof food packaging such as fast food wrappers.
Drinking filtered or bottled water and storing leftovers in glass -- not plastic -- containers could also help.
E.Gasser--VB