-
Cambodian PM's cousin says owned 30% of scam-linked firm
-
Hegseth's church brings its Christian nationalism to Washington
-
Afrobeats' Tiwa Savage nurtures Africa's future talent
-
Venice Biennale opens in turmoil over Russian presence
-
Philips profits double in first quarter
-
Strasbourg on verge of European final amid fan displeasure at owners BlueCo
-
Tradition, Trump and tennis: Five things about Pope Leo
-
100 years on Earth: Iconic naturalist Attenborough marks century
-
Bondi Beach mass shooting accused faces 19 extra charges
-
Ukraine reports strike as Kyiv's ceasefire due to begin
-
Australia says 13 citizens linked to alleged IS members returning from Syria
-
Thunder overpower Lakers, Pistons down Cavs
-
Boycott-hit 70th Eurovision celebrated under high security
-
Court case challenges New Zealand's 'magical thinking' climate plans
-
Iran war jolts China's well-oiled manufacturing hub
-
Oil sinks and stocks rally on peace hopes, Samsung tops $1 trillion
-
Infantino defends World Cup ticket prices
-
Pistons hold off Cavs to win series-opener
-
Rubio rising? Duel with Vance for 2028 heats up
-
Teen shooter kills two at Brazil school
-
US pauses Hormuz escorts in bid for deal, as threats continue
-
Judge orders German car-ramming suspect to psychiatric hospital
-
Fresh UAE attacks blamed on Iran draw new reality in the Gulf
-
Transoft Solutions Acquires CADaptor Solutions
-
Arsenal on cusp of history after reaching Champions League final
-
Trump says pausing Hormuz operation in push for Iran deal
-
Wembanyama accused of 'obvious' illegal blocking
-
Musk 'was going to hit me,' OpenAI executive says at trial
-
NFL star Diggs cleared of assaulting personal chef
-
Fans 'set the standards' at rocking Emirates: Arteta
-
Rahm doesn't see 'many ways out' of multi-year LIV deal
-
Rubio warns against 'destabilizing' acts on Taiwan before Trump China visit
-
US declares Iran offensive over, warns force remains an option
-
Saka ends Arsenal's 20-year wait to reach Champions League final
-
Outgoing Costa Rica leader secures top post in new cabinet
-
Rubio plays down Trump attacks on pope before Vatican trip
-
LIV Golf boss sees hope for new sponsors beyond 2026
-
Mexican BTS fans go wild as concerts grow near
-
Europe's first commercial robotaxi service rolls out in Croatia
-
Russian strikes kill 21 in Ukraine
-
Suspected hantavirus cases to be evacuated from cruise ship
-
G7 trade ministers meet, not expected to discuss US tariff threat
-
Hollywood star Malkovich gets Croatian citizenship
-
Mickelson pulls out of PGA Championship for family issues
-
Wales rugby great Halfpenny to retire
-
Rahm says player concessions needed to save LIV Golf
-
Bowlers, Samson keep Chennai afloat in IPL playoff race
-
Rolling Stones announce July 10 release of new album 'Foreign Tongues'
-
France's Macron taps ex-aide to head central bank
-
PSG 'not here to defend' against Bayern, says Luis Enrique
'I don't': AI wedding vows fall foul of Dutch law
A Dutch court broke the hearts of a couple after ruling that their marriage, whose wedding vows were drafted with the help of artificial intelligence, was not valid.
The couple thought they had sealed their love at the April 2025 service in Zwolle, in the north of the country.
Seeking an informal civil ceremony, they had asked a friend to officiate -- so the friend turned to ChatGPT to help compose the vows.
Between them, however, they missed the point, a Zwolle court ruled on Tuesday.
Couples are required by law to declare that they will fulfil all the legal obligations linked to marriage, the court noted in its judgment.
"The aforementioned statement shows that the man and the woman did not make the declaration referred to in Article 1:67, paragraph 1, of the Dutch Civil Code," it ruled.
The ruling quoted the AI-generated vows to make its point.
"Do you promise to stand by (women's name) today, tomorrow, and forever?" the man was asked during the ceremony.
"To laugh together, grow together, and love each other no matter what?"
- 'A crazy couple' -
They were also asked if they would "keep supporting each other, teasing each other, holding on to each other -- even in difficult times?"
Once those questions were answered, they were declared "not only husband and wife, but above all a team, a crazy couple, each other's love and each other's home!"
None of this found favour with the court, however.
Because of the text used at the ceremony, it ruled, the marriage between the man and the woman was not formalised.
"This means that the marriage certificate was erroneously recorded in the civil registry," it added.
The couple argued that they had not intended to make this mistake and that the civil officer at the ceremony had not pointed it out at the time.
Changing the date of their marriage would hit them hard emotionally, they argued, asking to be allowed to keep the date of their initial wedding as that of their legal marriage.
But there was no happily ever after from the court.
"The court understands how important the marriage date listed on the certificate is to the man and the woman, but it cannot ignore the law," it ruled.
B.Baumann--VB