-
Schoolgirl Yu, 13, fastest again in bid for third Asian Games gold
-
Mongolian herders enlist new tech against harsher, drier climate
-
Oil prices fall after Trump hails 'good' talks with Iran
-
Tata turmoil shines light on India succession woes
-
AI political ads warp reality ahead of US midterms
-
World Cup 'not enough' as Spain begin next chapter
-
Kenneth Branagh embraces action hero role -- to get in shape
-
Meta acts against 3.7 mn scammers' accounts with Singapore police help
-
'New one' Klopp promises fresh approach as Germany reign begins
-
Australia PM says draft social media rules about taking back control
-
Milne returns to New Zealand squad for India T20 series
-
Voting opens in Alaska's annual Fat Bear Week
-
US-led Americas coalition backs sanctions against crime groups
-
MLS coach axed for telling female ref 'It's a man's game'
-
'Star Wars' fans and art lovers line up for new Lucas museum
-
US refuses to give Sudan's de facto leader visa for UN
-
Trump renames AI 'super intelligence' as leaders jostle over dangers
-
Man City hold Bayern to start Women's Champions League, Arsenal win late
-
Oil prices retreat as markets welcome US-Iran talks
-
Trump threatens Iran with 'hell' but reveals fresh talks
-
US refusing to give Sudan's de facto leader visa for UN: diplomatic sources, UN
-
Trump signs security deal with Greenland, Denmark at UN
-
Macron urges world to choose UN over 'law of the jungle'
-
Trump threatens Iran with 'hell' but unveils fresh talks
-
All-rounder Jacks stars as England beat Sri Lanka in 1st ODI
-
Chile's Atacama Desert blossoms with life after El Nino rains
-
Man City peg back Bayern to start Women's Champions League
-
Sri Lanka hands 220-year jail terms to 15 convicted of Easter bombings
-
Trump beats 'America first' drum at UN as allies tread carefully
-
Typhoon Dujuan leaves 7 dead in Japan from landslides, flooding: media
-
Snedeker backs Spaun for Ryder Cup after Presidents snub
-
Ganna and Borghini lead Italy to mixed relay gold at cycling worlds
-
French prosecutors probe secret filming of women with smart glasses
-
Drug cocktail killed former child star Hayden Panettiere: coroner
-
Trump renames AI "super intelligence," rejects international oversight
-
Moldova declares energy, water emergency
-
Trump rejects international regulation of AI
-
French Holocaust denier jailed for eight months
-
How is the EU approaching record fuel prices?
-
Oil prices slide, AI stock buzz fades
-
Sri Lanka's Colombage strikes on debut as England dismissed for 265 in first ODI
-
Trump threatens to 'annihilate' Iran in bombastic UN speech
-
Hurricane Polo strengthens to top category 5 off Mexico
-
Prada's skirts take centre stage as Milan Fashion Week begins
-
11 hurt as teen opens fire outside school in western Turkey
-
Quoin Pharmaceuticals Announces FDA Fast Track Designation for QRX003 for the Treatment of Peeling Skin Syndrome
-
UN chief says 'Big Oil' treats atmosphere as open sewer
-
Brazil's Flavio Bolsonaro turns scandal into poll gains
-
Tunisia says 2026 summer hottest on record
-
Republican senator seeks probe of Trump Jr Russian-funded wedding
Roe v. Wade: 1973 case that enshrined US abortion rights
A US Supreme Court draft opinion leaked to the press on Monday suggests a majority of justices are ready to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade, shredding nearly 50 years of constitutional protections on abortion rights.
Here is how the original 1973 court case played out.
- Right to privacy -
On January 22, 1973, the court decided that the constitutional right to privacy applied to abortion.
Roe was "Jane Roe," a pseudonym for Norma McCorvey, a single mother pregnant for the third time, who wanted an abortion.
She sued the Dallas attorney general, Henry Wade, over a Texas law that made it a crime to terminate a pregnancy except in cases of rape or incest, or when the mother's life was in danger.
Filing a complaint alongside her was Texas doctor James Hallford, who argued the law's medical provision was vague, and that he was unable to reliably determine which of his patients fell into the allowed category.
The "Does," another couple, childless, also filed a companion complaint, saying that medical risks made it unsafe but not life-threatening for the wife to carry a pregnancy to term, and arguing they should be able to obtain a safe, legal abortion should she become pregnant.
The trifecta of complaints -- from a woman who wanted an abortion, a doctor who wanted to perform them and a non-pregnant woman who wanted the right if the need arose -- ultimately reached the nation's top court.
The court heard arguments twice, and then waited until after Republican president Richard Nixon's re-election, in November 1972.
- 'Sensitive and emotional' controversy -
Only the following January did it offer its historic seven-to-two decision -- overturning the Texas laws and setting a legal precedent that has had ramifications in all 50 states.
Justice Harry Blackmun, writing for the majority, said the court recognized the "sensitive and emotional nature of the abortion controversy, of the vigorous opposing views, even among physicians, and of the deep and seemingly absolute convictions that the subject inspires."
But he argued that the "right of privacy... is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy."
"A state criminal abortion statute of the current Texas type, that excepts from criminality only a lifesaving procedure on behalf of the mother, without regard to pregnancy stage and without recognition of the other interests involved, is violative of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment," the ruling read.
But the top court agreed with lower court rulings that the right to privacy with regard to pregnancy "is not absolute, and is subject to some limitations."
"At some point, the state interests as to protection of health, medical standards and prenatal life become dominant," Blackmun wrote.
The top court thus ruled partially against the doctor and the Does, but in favor of Jane Roe, who has since become a pro-life activist.
On the same day, the justices ruled in the separate "Doe v. Bolton" case, which authorized each state to add restrictions to abortion rights for later-term pregnancies.
The constitutional right to abortion was later confirmed in a number of decisions, including "Webster v. Reproductive Health Services" in 1989, "Planned Parenthood v. Casey" in 1992 and Stenberg v. Carhart" in 2000.
L.Janezki--BTB