-
China says takes Mbappe apology 'seriously' after Mao remark
-
Cyclone eases after lashing India coast, no deaths reported
-
Flavio Bolsonaro on way to Ecuador from Argentina after fleeing Brazil
-
AI chip giant SK hynix posts seven-fold surge in quarterly operating profit
-
Netanyahu bloc leads after half of Israeli votes counted but no majority
-
Two hundred 'Cruise for life' passengers stranded in Cambodia
-
India vows action after first cheetah shot dead
-
Pierce Brosnan and Helen Mirren on the joys of filming 'MobLand'
-
'Now or Never': Ethiopia influencers push for Eritrea invasion
-
S.African activists push back on data centre rush
-
Mbappe furore rages on in China, but Mao comments censored
-
Judges set to rule on Australian mushroom killer's appeal
-
Billionaire Ambani's Jio jumps 21% in market debut after record India IPO
-
Syria reopens Jordan border crossing after mending ties
-
Rays win thriller to thwart Brewers in World Series
-
Cyclone Arnab lashes India coast, no deaths reported
-
Reigning champ Knicks earn first win against Pistons
-
Trump tamed after US midterms? Europe doubts it
-
Runners swap streets for shopping malls as haze chokes Singapore
-
Tech stocks soar as SK hynix adds to rising AI confidence
-
Billionaire Ambani's Jio to debut after record India IPO
-
Sri Lanka's Tamil farmers fight to reclaim land after civil war
-
UK set for cautious budget as borrowing costs climb
-
Afghans compete for jobs, homes as millions return
-
Anthropic's record IPO faces some big questions
-
'They don't care about us': Trump food aid cuts leave Americans struggling and angry
-
US Fed expected to hold rates steady ahead of key midterm elections
-
Meta, Snap head to trial in another case about social media's harms
-
Can this Latin Grammy-winner help Democrats win back Congress?
-
French Senate passes bill to make protesters pay for unrest damage
-
Tuvalu has 'limited' power to halt its fossil fuel investments: NZ govt papers seen by AFP
-
India evacuates tens of thousands as Cyclone Arnab makes landfall
-
Palestinian activist Khalil returns to Columbia after US detention
-
In tight Israel vote, both camps hold out cautious hope
-
Trump drastically loosens oil and gas methane rules
-
AI chip giant SK hynix says quarterly operating profit soars 630%
-
French Senate weighs bill to make protesters pay for unrest damage
-
Youths testify about 'despair' in unprecedented Canadian climate trial
-
'A very sad day': Arteta despair as Arsenal stunned by Fleetwood
-
Syria, Jordan agree to mend ties after deadly strike
-
Charles tackles thorny legacy of slavery on Caribbean trip
-
Arsenal stunned by fourth-tier Fleetwood in League Cup
-
Former Grand Slam winner Wawrinka ends tennis career
-
Last-gasp Sabitzer strike sends Dortmund past Bremen in German Cup
-
Brazil's Flavio Bolsonaro flees to US after election loss
-
Rights groups reject Emirati diplomat for UN top job
-
'Faerie' nights: 'ACOTAR' fans finally get their book
-
Flavio Bolsonaro headed to US after Brazil election defeat: US media
-
American woman convicted of getting military training from Islamic State
-
Alcaraz and Zverev win Vienna openers
US Supreme Court strikes down constitutional right to abortion
The US Supreme Court on Friday ended the right to abortion in a seismic ruling that shreds half a century of constitutional protections on one of the most divisive and bitterly fought issues in American political life.
The conservative-dominated court overturned the landmark 1973 "Roe v Wade" decision that enshrined a woman's right to an abortion, saying that individual states can now permit or restrict the procedure themselves.
"The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives," the court said.
In the majority opinion, Justice Samuel Alito said "abortion presents a profound moral issue on which Americans hold sharply conflicting views.
"The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating or prohibiting abortion," he said.
Dissenting were the three liberals on the court.
The ruling will likely set into motion a cavalcade of new laws in roughly half of the 50 US states that will severely restrict or outright ban and criminalize abortions, forcing women to travel long distances to states that still permit the procedure.
The opinion shredded the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling by the nation's highest court that said women had the right to abortion based on the constitutional right to privacy over their own bodies.
Alito's opinion largely mirrors his draft opinion that was the subject of an extraordinary leak in early May, sparking demonstrations around the country and tightened security at the court in downtown Washington.
Barricades have been erected around the court to keep back the protesters gathered outside -- after an armed man was arrested on June 8 near the home of conservative justice Brett Kavanaugh.
The court's ruling goes against an international trend of easing abortion laws, including in such countries as Ireland, Argentina, Mexico and Colombia where the Catholic Church continues to wield considerable influence.
- Victory for religious right -
It represents a victory of 50 years of struggle against abortion by the religious right but the anti-abortion camp is expected to continue to push for an outright nationwide ban.
The ruling was made possible by the nomination of three conservative justices to the court by former Republican president Donald Trump -- Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.
The case before the court was a Mississippi law that would restrict abortion to 15 weeks but during the hearing of the case in December several justices indicated they were prepared to go further.
According to the Guttmacher Institute, 13 states have adopted so-called "trigger laws" that will ban abortion following the move by the Supreme Court.
Ten others have pre-1973 laws that could go into force or legislation that would ban abortion after six weeks, before many women even know they are pregnant.
Women living in states with strict anti-abortion laws will either have to continue with their pregnancy, undergo a clandestine abortion or obtain abortion pills, or travel to another state where the procedure remains legal.
Several Democratic-ruled states, anticipating an influx, have taken steps to facilitate abortion and clinics have also shifted their resources.
Travel is expensive, however, and abortion rights groups say abortion restrictions will severely impact poor women, many of whom are Black or Hispanic.
M.Odermatt--BTB