-
Stocks rise on AI buzz, oil prices cool
-
Magnificent Mandhana's 79 helps India to Asian Games cricket gold
-
India narrowly survive huge scare against minnows Japan
-
Marchand 'stressed' about racing Japanese rivals at LA Olympics
-
Missing F-35 fighter parts 'not sensitive', says Australia minister
-
Mobile boat clinics bring healthcare to India's remote islands
-
Cambodia showcases scams crackdown with global conference
-
Former India paceman Zaheer Khan named Chennai coach in IPL
-
Afghan cyclist who disguised herself as man wins Asian Games silver
-
Six-year-old Chinese girl sets world record with Rubik's Cube
-
Typhoon Dujuan leaves four dead in Japan, 45,000 houses without power
-
Swimming prodigy Yu, 13, says 'interviews way harder than racing'
-
G7 leaders condemn Houthi strikes on Saudi Arabia
-
Star coaches make their bows as Nations League returns
-
Google data centre sparks protests in Austria
-
Rams bounce back as Giants reel from Dart injury
-
Shin Ohashi: Junk food-loving teen and Japan's next big swimming hope
-
In Bangladesh, Pakistan's Jinnah photo stirs anger
-
Stocks rise on AI buzz, drop in oil prices
-
Two New Zealand naval ships transit Taiwan Strait
-
China's robot dancers limber up for America's Got Talent final
-
Zidane gets down to work as France start new era
-
Despite military might, Saudi struggles to crush the Houthis
-
Inside the Venezuelan prison meant to 'drive you insane'
-
Trump to tout deals, defend Iran war in UN speech
-
UK king braces as memoir by Diana's brother goes on sale
-
Sri Lanka to issue verdict in landmark Easter attack trial
-
No green light to lift EU sanctions on Russian oligarchs, talks to resume
-
Macron says talks with Trump on Red Sea, Ukraine 'constructive'
-
UK agrees support for Saudi in struggle with Houthis: reports
-
Green policies just good politics, says UK minister
-
EU foreign policy chief calls for continued sanctions on Russia
-
Bardot auction in Paris fetches nearly one million euros
-
Flights scrapped, evacuations urged as Typhoon Dujuan wallops Japan
-
No timeline on Daniels injury return, says Commanders coach
-
Fonseca to take break from tennis
-
British Columbia sues OpenAI in US court over Canada school shooting
-
A Cuban zoo, and its animals, in epic battle for survival
-
French star Batum retires after 18-year NBA career
-
Infantino proposes consulting federations to reform FIFA
-
Zidane leads first France training session
-
El Nino weather pattern enters record territory: scientist
-
Man shot by ICE agent in Texas detained with bullet inside him: lawyer
-
OpenAI calls for US to lead global effort on AI standards
-
California declares state of emergency ahead of El Nino
-
South African ostriches plucked alive for luxury fashion: report
-
South Africa arrests three more suspects, after nine women murdered
-
US networks halt Trump coverage in revolt over White House ban
-
Carse needs time away from England, says captain Brook
-
Paramount settles with US states to clear Warner Bros. mega-merger
TikTok's US future hangs in balance at federal court
TikTok will attempt to convince a federal court on Monday that a law requiring the video-sharing app to divest from its Chinese ownership or face a ban in the United States is unconstitutional.
The fate of Americans' access to TikTok has become a prominent issue in the country's political debate, with Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump opposing any ban of the wildly popular app.
Democratic President Joe Biden, whose vice president Kamala Harris is running against Trump, signed the law that gives TikTok until January to shed its Chinese ownership or be expelled from the US market.
ByteDance, TikTok's parent company, has stated it has no plans to sell TikTok, leaving the app's legal appeal -- focused on US guarantees for free speech -- as its only option for survival.
A ban would likely provoke a strong response from the Chinese government and further strain US-China relations.
A three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit will hear arguments from TikTok, ByteDance, and a group of users.
They will primarily contend that the law violates free speech rights.
The judges will decide the case in the coming weeks or months, but regardless of their decision, the case is likely to reach the US Supreme Court.
"There is no question: the Act will force a shutdown of TikTok by January 19, 2025," TikTok's appeal stated, "silencing those who use the platform to communicate in ways that cannot be replicated elsewhere."
TikTok also argued that even if divestiture were possible, the app "would still be reduced to a shell of its former self, stripped of the innovative and expressive technology that tailors content to each user."
TikTok asserts that "the Constitution is on our side," as it pushes for a ruling that would favor the app and its 170 million American users.
The US government counters that the law addresses national security concerns, not speech, and that ByteDance cannot claim First Amendment rights in the United States.
"Given TikTok's broad reach within the United States, the capacity for China to use TikTok's features to achieve its overarching objective to undermine American interests creates a national-security threat of immense depth and scale," the US Justice Department wrote in its filing.
The US argues that ByteDance could and would comply with Chinese government demands for data about US users, or yield to Chinese government pressure to censor or promote content on the platform.
- 'Vote for Trump' -
TikTok first faced scrutiny under former president Trump's administration, which tried unsuccessfully to ban it.
That effort was halted when a federal judge temporarily blocked Trump's move, citing in part the potential infringement of free speech rights.
Trump has since changed his position.
"For all of those that want to save TikTok in America, vote for Trump," he said in a video post last week.
In a measure of the app's popularity, Biden's reelection campaign created a TikTok account earlier this year.
Biden has since stepped aside from his reelection bid, but Harris, running in his place, also maintains a presence on the app, having embraced social media as a means to communicate with younger voters.
The new effort signed by Biden was designed to overcome the previous legal hurdles Trump faced, but some experts believe the US Supreme Court will have difficulty allowing national security considerations to outweigh free speech protections.
Much of the US side's national security arguments are sealed, which "complicates efforts to evaluate" them, said professor Carl Tobias of the University of Richmond School of Law.
"However, the US Supreme Court has generally been very cautious about accepting national security arguments when government regulation restricts First Amendment rights, especially involving the internet," he added.
D.Bachmann--VB