-
17 injured, five critically, in head-on train crash in Denmark
-
Iran economy looks set to withstand US naval blockade
-
EssilorLuxottica sales slide as investors turn wary of AI glasses
-
Lufthansa loses fight over bailout at EU top court
-
Eurozone business activity falls on Mideast war
-
Leipzig and Union's Bundesliga clash shows changing face of football
-
Trump envoy wants Italy to replace Iran at World Cup: report
-
Electric vehicles supercharge EU car sales
-
Starc cleared to play in IPL by Cricket Australia
-
South Korea e-commerce probe opens rift in US ties
-
Clearing Hormuz Strait mines could take six months: report
-
South Korea's Samsung workers rally in thousands as strike looms
-
US firms voice 'concern' over China's new supply chain rules
-
Iran says won't reopen Hormuz if US upholds naval blockade
-
Japanese team with school coach to cap remarkable journey to the top
-
UN leadership hopefuls stress need for peace and restoring confidence
-
France must avoid becoming 'hostage' on critical minerals: trade minister
-
Thunder roll past Suns, Pistons bounce back to level series with Magic
-
US says China used 'intimidation' to block Taiwan leader's Africa trip
-
Suarez off mark but Messi fires blanks as Miami beat Salt Lake
-
Inter ready to pounce for Serie A title glory as Milan host Juve
-
Fresh paint, careful choreography as pope visits African prison
-
Jones calls on Australian fans to get behind Japan at World Cup
-
Sellers in China trade hub seek tariff reprieve from Trump visit
-
Stocks sink and oil rises with Iran, US no closer to peace talks
-
'Dancing in their hands': Japan wig masters set stage alive
-
Climate scrubbed from G7 meeting to appease US, host France says
-
Trump, his 'low IQ' slur, and the right's race obsession
-
Chip giant SK hynix posts record quarterly profit on AI boom
-
'Big loss' for F1 if Verstappen quits, say McLaren rivals
-
Israeli strikes kill 5 in Lebanon, Beirut to seek truce extension
-
Barca edge Celta but lose match-winner Yamal to injury
-
UK, France agree three-year deal to stop migrant crossings
-
Trump looks for way out on war, but Iran may not oblige
-
Tears and smiles at tribute concert for Swiss fire victims
-
Tesla reports higher profits, topping estimates
-
Manchester City go top of Premier League as Burnley relegated
-
Kane and Diaz send Bayern past Leverkusen into German Cup final
-
Concert pays tribute to Swiss fire disaster victims
-
US stocks rise, shrugging off uncertain ceasefire prospects while oil prices jump
-
Pope hits out at jails in closed-off Equatorial Guinea
-
Atletico beaten again in Elche thriller
-
England rugby great Moody offered 'hope' in battle with motor neurone disease
-
PSG roll over Nantes to move closer to Ligue 1 title
-
Ecuador doctors protest crisis as patients bring own meds to surgery
-
Top Peru ministers quit in protest over stalled US fighter jet deal
-
De La Hoya and Ali's grandson slam proposed federal boxing reform
-
Trump alleges Democratic-backed Virginia referendum was 'rigged'
-
Archer, Burger help Rajasthan beat Lucknow in IPL
-
Migrants deported from US stranded, 'scared' in DR Congo
UK court hears latest Prince Harry libel suit against newspaper
A libel lawsuit brought by Prince Harry against one of Britain's biggest newspaper groups had its first court date Thursday in the latest legal action taken by the US-based royal.
The Duke of Sussex is suing Associated Newspapers -- which publishes the Daily Mail, Mail on Sunday and MailOnline -- over an article alleging he had sought to keep a request for British police protection under wraps.
The lawsuit relates to coverage in the Mail on Sunday and online of a separate court challenge he is pursuing against the UK government over his security arrangements when he is in Britain.
Harry, 37, and his wife Meghan Markle, 40, live in California after stepping down from royal duties in 2019, which caused them to lose their UK taxpayer-paid protection.
The prince's lawyer, Justin Rushbrooke, told the High Court in a written submission that the February article was "defamatory" because it suggested Harry had "lied" and "improperly and cynically" tried to manipulate public opinion over the issue.
Associated Newspapers' legal team is disputing that there was "any meaning defamatory" of him in its coverage.
In the legal claim against the government, the duke has appealed to the High Court for a review of the interior ministry's refusal to allow him to pay for police protection himself, arguing the decision means he cannot return home safely.
The government has dismissed the offer to pay for police protection as "irrelevant," writing to the court earlier this year that personal "security by the police is not available on a privately financed basis".
The cases come after the royal couple launched legal action in recent years against a number of publications, alleging invasion of privacy.
Markle won a long-running case against Associated Newspapers last year over the publication of a letter she wrote to her estranged father.
Judge Matthew Nicklin, who is hearing the new libel claim, will rule on a number of preliminary issues that he is considering following Thursday's hearing.
A.Gasser--BTB