-
US imposes new tariffs on 60 partners as Trump rebuilds trade agenda
-
Fear, arrests keep Cambodians quiet decade after critic's murder
-
Stocks suffer fresh blow as markets hit by perfect storm
-
Over 80% of Mexican exports exempt from new US tariffs
-
Trump under pressure from all sides over Chinese AI surge
-
Is 'superstar' Pogacar's Tour de France domination boring?
-
ICC member states decide fate of embattled prosecutor Karim Khan
-
Iran ramps up executions under shadow of war
-
Dodgers return to Trump White House despite fan anger
-
Rosalia's Argentine fans up in arms over alleged World Cup snub
-
Lyles, Richardson ease into 100m semis at US athletics championships
-
Six candidates to lead UN take stage for televised debate
-
Salman Rushdie testifies at knife attacker's US terror trial
-
King Charles opens slimmed down Commonwealth Games in Glasgow
-
World Bank confirms plan to phase out China lending by 2031
-
US unveils new tariffs on 60 partners as Trump rebuilds trade agenda
-
US panel backs trendy peptides despite safety concerns
-
WNBA viral star Cunningham wades into trans athletes row
-
Justice Dept withdraws NY Times subpoenas over Trump plane report
-
Hearn dismisses Fury talk of Joshua no-show for super fight
-
Barcelona's De Jong returns from World Cup with torn ligament
-
'Like a war zone': France evacuates 20,000 due to wildfires
-
Albania police teargas protesters against Trump-linked resort
-
Ships avoid Ukrainian grain ports after Russian attacks
-
US panel says to loosen restrictions on popular peptide despite safety concerns
-
Oil passes $100 a barrel again: why it's more serious this time
-
Verstappen swerves around future questions
-
Who are the six candidates vying to lead the UN?
-
EU renews online child sex abuse detection powers
-
Hamilton proud of recovery after hitting rock bottom a year ago
-
Airbus, Boeing fly in different directions at Farnborough
-
Carapaz eyes polkadot mountains jersey after stage win
-
Bab al-Mandeb Strait: another key oil shipping route under threat
-
Fields medal awarded to four young mathematicians
-
Deadly wildfires in Europe force thousands to flee
-
Carapaz claims Tour de France stage as Pogacar loses key team-mate
-
NATO to overhaul European fuel pipeline network
-
Alonso welcomes Aston Martin upgrade, warns against unreal expectations
-
US trade envoy to make tariff announcement as 10% duty soon expires
-
Anderson declares Man City 'kings of Manchester' after £116 mn move
-
Trump stuns Saudis by pinning nuclear deal to Israel ties
-
Relieved Russell says Mercedes have solved his power problems mystery
-
Tough day for Ubisoft stock topped with weaker revenues
-
Oil soars above $100 as Middle East fears grow
-
Swelling jet fuel costs hit American Airlines outlook
-
Venezuelans turn to scrap collecting in quake-hit beach 'paradise'
-
Carapaz climbs unopposed to Tour de France 18th stage win
-
Heptathlon champion Johnson-Thompson joins list of Commonwealth Games absentees
-
Sooryavanshi hits maiden 50 as India thump Zimbabwe in T20
-
Nigeria's Dangote raises $2.5bn to expand Africa's largest refinery
Swedish study shows snoozing in the morning isn't bad
You snooze, you lose? Swedish researchers said Wednesday that might not be the case, after their study even saw some benefits for those struggling with morning drowsiness.
While for many, a reach for the snooze button on the alarm clock is how most days start, researchers at Stockholm University noted that little is still known about the habit, prompting them to conduct two studies, the results of which where published Wednesday.
The first sought to identify who the snoozers actually were via the use of questionnaires collected from 1,732 respondents.
"In the first study we found that in general younger people were the ones snoozing and they were to a high degree night owls," Tina Sundelin, sleep researcher at Stockholm University, told AFP, noting that the initial finding was not too surprising.
Sundelin explained that the most common reason for snoozing was simply "because they felt too tired to get up."
But in some cases respondents said they just enjoying the feeling of staying in bed for a while longer, describing it as a "luxury".
The second study then examined how snoozing actually impacted performance and they had 31 individuals join them at their sleep lab.
They then tested the difference between uninterrupted sleep and getting up immediately or first waking up a half-hour earlier and snoozing before getting up.
"What was interesting is that they got less sleep when snoozing but the difference was on average only six minutes," Sundelin explained, adding that most of them managed to get a lot of sleep during that half hour even though it was disturbed.
The test subjects were then asked to perform a few cognitive tests, such as math and memory tests.
Despite having their sleep interrupted at the tail end, there wasn't much difference in how tired they felt, nor was their performance on the tests negatively affected.
"In some of the tests, they even performed a little better after having snoozed," Sundelin said, adding that "the clearest effect is that it isn't negative."
For Sundelin, the results mean that those who need to snooze a little to ease into the day shouldn't be too worried.
"If you're snoozing and feel like it's helping you, it seems like there isn't much reason to stop doing it, as long you are getting enough sleep before," Sundelin said.
S.Leonhard--VB