-
Abhishek hits record T20 ton as India post 221-7 against Afghanistan
-
AFP photo shows Trump examining image of apparent Kennedy Center razing
-
Macron hosts Lebanon security talks to back 'indispensable' army
-
Pochettino rings changes for USA friendlies
-
Final rally of season in Saudi Arabia cancelled due to Middle East conflict
-
Alonso says Chelsea ambition 'very clear' after end of Boehly era
-
Gaza documentary sparks political storm in Israel
-
Mbappe draws political fire over Ceuta t-shirt controversy
-
King Charles warns tech bosses of 'existential dangers' of AI
-
Third malaria death in Germany from outbreak tied to Frankfurt airport
-
French fishermen block ports over petrol prices
-
AtlasClear Holdings Reports Preliminary Fiscal 2026 Revenue of Approximately $20.1 Million, Up 85%; Revenue Plus Interest Income of Approximately $21.9 Million
-
AFP photo shows Trump examining image of Kennedy Center apparent demolition
-
Alonso says Chelsea ambition clear after end of Boehly era
-
Andersson vows to take Sweden in 'new direction' after election win
-
Micron's Taiwan workers say 68 months' bonus not enough
-
Turkey's Erdogan to run again in early 2028 vote, top adviser says
-
'Another arrow to the quiver': World Bank posts record private capital mobilization
-
Sweden's Andersson: a trusted, no-nonsense political operator
-
Macron hosts Lebanon security talks as UN mission nears end
-
Canada's Carney pushes 'new alliance' with EU despite Trump threats
-
From land to race laws: what's driving the US-South Africa rift?
-
Ireland to boycott Eurovision 2027 over Gaza
-
Beyond Investment Returns: Families Are Measuring Wealth by Freedom, Continuity, and Legacy, According to Nour Private Wealth
-
India's Tata Sons reappoints N. Chandrasekaran as chairman
-
King Charles disputes claims in book by Princess Diana's brother
-
Sweden's left-wing wins election thriller
-
Real Madrid fan group wants Mbappe apology over Ceuta shirt snub
-
Germany urges EU action against China to defend carmakers
-
Nepal floods among 'most challenging' disasters: WFP
-
Stocks mostly rise after US Fed rate hike, oil eases
-
Doubts as Italy eyes electric future for steel plant
-
Palestinians turn rugged caves into homes after Israeli demolitions
-
'One of the kindest people': Taraneh, 21, facing execution in Iran
-
Two unseen Monet paintings to be sold in Paris: auction house
-
Japan eyes changing prostitution law to punish sex buyers
-
Klopp wants German team to help reclaim national pride from far-right
-
After record rain, typhoon threatens new challenge to Asian Games
-
Ninth woman found dead in South Africa killing spree
-
Kids and social media: what would change under new EU law
-
Smog scuppers Japan force helping fight Indonesia wildfires
-
Modi pitches India as global chipmaking hub
-
King Charles to call on tech giants for 'reassurances' over AI
-
Ukraine plans record defence spending in 2027
-
Lebanon security talks in Paris focus on replacing UN mission
-
Klopp calls up 44 players in huge first Germany squad
-
Most stocks rise as Fed hikes and oil prices drop
-
STARPRIME Responds to Diverging Gold Market Demand with AM/PM Fixing and XAU24/7
-
'Vande Mataram': Why is India's freedom song in spotlight?
-
Ukrainian fashion designer debuts art between air raids
Can we shut down AI?
The debate over potential dangers posed by artificial intelligence has resurged in recent weeks, with researchers once again warning the technology could end humanity, and leaders of AI companies suggesting development needed to be slowed.
One of the co-founders of AI firm Anthropic told the BBC this week he believed kill switches may need to be made mandatory for AI.
But if an AI system goes rogue, is it even possible to shut it down?
- Is there a 'kill switch'? -
"From an AI cybersecurity perspective, the term 'kill switch' refers to the ability to interrupt the execution of an AI agent's action," Nicolas Papernot, a professor at the University of Toronto and a specialist in computer security and artificial intelligence, told AFP.
The person or organisation that deployed the AI agent -- an industry term for a bot that has the potential to operate autonomously -- can stop it by denying it access to the computing power it needs to run, Papernot said.
The situation becomes more complicated if the program has been allowed to act beyond its initial environment.
Papernot envisaged a scenario where AI could be used to spread a computer worm -- a type of self-replicating malware.
"In that case, we would have to simultaneously interrupt the action of all copies the worm made of itself -- device by device by device," he said.
- Can we really switch off an AI? -
Thierry Poibeau, an AI expert at the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), said the image of a single button that would let us "switch off AI" is misleading.
"You can't really just cut off AI like that," he said.
"There are an enormous number of companies around the world, and all sorts of different software and services. There's no single person who controls AI as a whole."
But it is possible to shut down a specific system when you control the machines and services it depends on.
Hussein Abbass, a computer science professor at the University of New South Wales (UNSW) in Canberra, wrote on LinkedIn that AI systems could be divided into three levels of complexity.
In the first, a centralised AI system entirely under the control of its operator, an emergency shutdown mechanism would be "theoretically and practically possible".
But in his other two "decentralised" scenarios, where AI programs have been given permissions to act on other software, files, machines or even systems, it would be much more difficult to stop everything.
- What are the risks of a kill switch? -
The more AI is integrated into everyday activities, the greater the risk that shutting it down will also paralyse legitimate uses.
Papernot said: "As AI is increasingly embedded in all of our institutions and businesses, and as we automate more and more aspects of daily life using AI, it will be harder to use compute power as a kill switch -- because that will mean all of those other legitimate functions will also grind to a stop."
Stopping an AI system could degrade services that businesses, public administrations, or healthcare institutions already depend on.
The costs and drawbacks of such a move would be "enormous", Papernot added.
And some leading public figures have warned against scaremongering about AI.
US President Donald Trump has dismissed existential fears about AI as a hoax, while Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has argued against calls to slow AI development, saying market incentives and legal liability are the best safeguards.
For Jean-Gabriel Ganascia, professor of computer science at Sorbonne University, the debate on the "kill switch" can feed into the idea misleading idea that AI's greatest risk is it developing a will of its own.
Instead, he said, the more concrete risk lies in our growing dependence on such systems.
F.Fehr--VB