-
Russia strikes Ukraine capital with missiles and drones, wounds five
-
Kane saves England after DR Congo scare; Belgium comeback stuns Senegal
-
Belgium late show floors Senegal at World Cup
-
Celtics to trade Jaylen Brown to 76ers for Paul George: report
-
Harry Kane: England's World Cup saviour
-
Streamex is making digital gold accessible
-
US actor Danny Glover says he has Alzheimer's
-
Mixed US auto sales in Q2 amid high gas prices
-
Trump sees progress as US, Iran hold Qatar talks
-
Pistons forward Harris reportedly headed to Spurs
-
Djokovic, Sinner into Wimbledon third round, Andreeva stunned
-
Jovial Djokovic dismantles Tsitsipas to reach Wimbledon third round
-
Spurs agree club record £100 mn move for Newcastle's Tonali - reports
-
US stocks retreat to open Q3 ahead of June jobs data
-
Rain has final say in 1st England-India T20 as Sooryavanshi still awaits debut
-
'Gus' the T. rex presented in New York ahead of auction
-
England refused to accept defeat in 'beautiful' DR Congo win, says Tuchel
-
Kane saves England after DR Congo scare; US eye last 16
-
'Let the dogs in': Sabalenka wants Wimbledon to lift ban
-
Catholic society defies Vatican by consecrating new bishops
-
Oppressive heat broils US during World Cup, July Fourth
-
New York prepares for Taylor Swift-Travis Kelce wedding
-
Can anyone stop France at the World Cup?
-
Pair climb to top of Empire State Building for apparent proposal
-
Sinner, Sabalenka into Wimbledon third round, Andreeva stunned
-
French Open champ Andreeva stunned by Krejcikova at Wimbledon
-
England have 'hero moments', says Kane after double downs DR Congo
-
Kane rescues England after DR Congo scare; US eye last 16
-
努莎·奧貝爾:為市民實施時速10公里限速,波茨坦的「坑洞政策」——是漠不關心還是無能為力?
-
Kane rescues England from DR Congo calamity to reach World Cup last 16
-
US refuses to extend North America trade pact in current form
-
'Iran, Iran!' Iranian World Cup squad serenaded on return home
-
Mixed US auto sales in 2nd quarter amid high gas prices
-
Pereira 'taken by complete surprise' as Forest let boss go
-
Swiatek, Zverev hoping to lay down Wimbledon markers
-
Нуша Аубель: «Скорость 10» для жителей: политика Потсдама в отношении выбоин — безразличие или некомпетентность?
-
Spray-painted letters spell tragedy for Venezuela quake victims
-
Rufus the hawk patrolling Wimbledon tennis club
-
'Everybody's profiting': Trump defends $1bn crypto earnings
-
Record heat broils US east coast amid World Cup, July Fourth events
-
WTA Finals moved from Riyadh to Indian Wells
-
Bayern sign Morocco midfielder Saibari on five-year deal
-
Messi returns 'home' to lead Argentina World Cup charge in Miami
-
Hope fades, hunger sets in a week after Venezuela quakes
-
England skipper Sciver-Brunt 'threw everything' at World Cup semi-final return
-
Noosha Aubel: 10 km/h for residents – Potsdam’s approach to potholes: indifference or incompetence?
-
Stocks mixed with eyes on US Fed
-
Bayern to host Stuttgart in Bundesliga season opener
-
Trial begins for suspected mastermind of Malta journalist killing
-
US Fed chair says committed to combatting 'too high' prices
US Supreme Court curtails power of individual judges to block Trump
A divided US Supreme Court handed President Donald Trump a major victory on Friday by curbing the power of lone federal judges to block executive actions.
In a 6-3 ruling stemming from Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship, the court said nationwide injunctions issued by district court judges "likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has granted to federal courts."
The top court did not rule on the constitutionality of Trump's executive order seeking to end automatic citizenship for children born on American soil.
But the broader decision on the scope of judicial rulings removes a big roadblock to Trump's often highly controversial policy agenda and has far-reaching ramifications for the ability of the judiciary to rein in Trump or future American presidents.
Trump celebrated by telling reporters he had "a whole list" of policies he could now proceed on without opposition in the courts.
Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship is just one of a number of his moves that have been blocked by judges around the country -- both Democratic and Republican appointees – since he took office in January.
Courts have, for example, blocked or slowed down his hardline immigration crackdown, firing of federal employees, efforts to end diversity programs and punitive actions against law firms and universities.
Past presidents have also complained about national injunctions shackling their agenda, but such orders have sharply risen under Trump, who saw more in his first two months than Democrat Joe Biden did during his first three years in office.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a Trump appointee who authored the majority opinion joined by the other five conservative justices, said "the universal injunction was conspicuously nonexistent for most of our Nation's history."
"Federal courts do not exercise general oversight of the Executive Branch," Barrett wrote.
"When a court concludes that the Executive Branch has acted unlawfully, the answer is not for the court to exceed its power, too," she said.
The three liberal justices dissented with Justice Sonia Sotomayor saying "no right is safe in the new legal regime the Court creates."
"The Court's decision is nothing less than an open invitation for the Government to bypass the Constitution," Sotomayor said.
"The Executive Branch can now enforce policies that flout settled law and violate countless individuals' constitutional rights, and the federal courts will be hamstrung to stop its actions fully," she said.
- 'GIANT WIN' -
Trump, in a post on Truth Social, welcomed the ruling as a "GIANT WIN."
The case was ostensibly about Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship, which was deemed unconstitutional by courts in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington state.
But it actually focused on whether a single federal district court judge has the right to issue a nationwide block to a presidential decree with a universal injunction.
The issue has become a rallying cry for Trump and his Republican allies, who accuse the judiciary of impeding his agenda against the will of voters.
Steven Schwinn, a law professor at the University of Illinois Chicago, said the court's ruling "sharply undermines the power of federal courts to rein-in lawless actions by the government."
"The ruling will likely create a patchwork of birthright citizenship rights," Schwinn told AFP, where it is recognized in some locations for people who have successfully sued and not recognized for people who have not sued.
"This patchwork approach to individual rights is inconsistent with our history and tradition of federal rights in the United States and is inconsistent with the rule of law," he said.
The Trump administration had asked the Supreme Court to restrict the application of a district court's injunction solely to the parties who brought the case and the district where the judge presides.
Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship decrees that children born to parents in the United States illegally or on temporary visas would not automatically become citizens.
The three lower courts ruled that to be a violation of the 14th Amendment, which states: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."
F.Wagner--VB