-
Mission impossible? England take the World Cup high road against Mexico
-
'I was just missing a goal,' says Spain's Yamal
-
Ukraine, Russia vow escalation as strikes on Kyiv kill 27
-
'Royal wedding': Epic Swift-Kelce fairytale marriage begins
-
Messi meeting the "game of our lives", says Cape Verde coach
-
France's Barcola expecting physical Paraguay clash at World Cup
-
Do not open until 2276: US burying time capsule to mark July 4
-
Sciver-Brunt and Knight send England into Women's T20 World Cup final
-
Scaloni warns Argentina that Cape Verde success 'no accident'
-
Spain power into last 16 at World Cup, Portugal face Croatia
-
Spain ease past Austria with 3-0 World Cup win
-
Emotional Dimitrov enjoys redemptive Wimbledon win over Mensik
-
Endrick says versatility could help Brazil against Norway
-
New York ready for epic Swift-Kelce fairytale wedding
-
Ghana have 'duty to Africa' to progress at World Cup, says Queiroz
-
Rubio says USA 'screwed' by World Cup red card
-
Former Celtics star Brown in shock over trade to 76ers
-
Heat dome roasts eastern US ahead of holiday weekend
-
Progress, further delay risk for Boeing Air Force One: report
-
WHO declares cruise ship hantavirus outbreak over
-
US coach Pochettino '200% Argentine' but embraces Americana
-
Sciver-Brunt and Knight take England to 169-5 in South Africa semi-final
-
Ukraine, Russia vow escalation after Moscow strikes on Kyiv kill 25
-
Trump's massive July 4 firework show raises health alarms
-
Prosecutors can review Woods medical records in DUI case: judge
-
Pogacar expects Vingegaard Tour de France battle to last 'years'
-
Japan deploys bear cameras in mountains as attacks surge
-
New York ready for epic Swift-Kelce love story wedding
-
Djokovic has history in his sights at Wimbledon
-
Wildfires rage in southern France, 3,000 people evacuated
-
Ovechkin returning to Caps for 22nd NHL season
-
Hamilton gives F1 a piece of his mind over Lego cars
-
Faster than Mbappe: Australia flyer Bos races into World Cup conversation
-
Hong Kong bookseller once held in China dies in Taiwan
-
Trump wants 'senseless killing' in Ukraine to end: US official
-
Venezuelan rescue brings hope to nation in mourning
-
Eala writes history for Philippines in 'electric' Wimbledon atmosphere
-
Macabre night in La Guaira, Venezuela's earthquake epicenter
-
Wolff urges 'perspective' as Russell chases Mercedes' teammate Antonelli
-
Tesla global auto sales jump 25% in 2nd quarter, beating expectations
-
Superb Swiatek, Zverev cruise into Wimbledon last 32
-
Zverev routs Royer to reach Wimbledon third round
-
Ukraine, Russia vow escalation after Moscow attack kills 21 in Kyiv
-
Hot spell roasts eastern US ahead of holiday weekend
-
Slowing US job growth poses midterms challenge for Trump
-
Hamilton cools fans Ferrari fervour
-
Klopp poised to replace Nagelsmann as Germany coach: reports
-
Venezuela's diaspora searches for quake victims on social media
-
More than 400 dead in DR Congo's spreading Ebola outbreak
-
Albanian clashes as protest over Trump-linked resort boils over
What comes next in Trump's legal battle over tariffs?
A US federal appeals court has temporarily halted a ruling that found many of President Donald Trump's tariffs illegal, but the chance it could ultimately back the original decision looms over the White House.
What is in the US Court of International Trade's original ruling -- which the Trump administration is appealing -- and what options does the administration have?
- Which tariffs were affected? -
The three-judge trade court ruled Wednesday that Trump overstepped his authority in imposing blanket tariffs by invoking emergency economic powers.
The judgment -- although temporarily halted -- affected levies unveiled on April 2, which involve a 10-percent tariff on most trading partners and higher rates on dozens of economies including China and the European Union. These higher levels are currently suspended while negotiations take place.
The ruling also applies to tariffs imposed on Canada, Mexico and China over their alleged roles in allowing an influx of drugs into the United States.
But it left intact sector-specific levies like those on steel, aluminum and auto imports.
- Why a pause? -
The ruling by the little-known court, which has nationwide jurisdiction over tariff and trade disputes, initially gave the White House 10 days to complete the process of unwinding the levies.
But the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Thursday granted a temporary stay "until further notice" while the Trump administration's appeals process plays out.
This means the tariffs can remain in effect for now, while a longer-term outcome is yet to be determined.
National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett told Fox News the administration is "very pleased with the ruling," dubbing it a victory.
- What are Trump's alternatives? -
The appeals court could eventually uphold the trade court's original decision to block Trump's sweeping tariffs.
The president, however, has other means to reinstate his tariff agenda, said Thibault Denamiel, a fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
These include Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, "which is intended to deal with a balance of payments emergency but does not require a formal investigation," Denamiel told AFP.
The authority restricts tariffs to 15 percent and they can only last 150 days.
But it is among the policy levers that Trump could pull as he seeks a "bridge" towards more lasting actions, said KPMG chief economist Diane Swonk.
Another option is Section 338 of the Trade Act of 1930, allowing the administration to impose tariffs of up to 50 percent on countries that discriminate against the United States, Denamiel said.
- Does this affect trade talks? -
The US trade court's ruling did not remove the threat of US tariffs for Europe or end the need for negotiations, said Andrew Kenningham, chief Europe economist at Capital Economics.
This is because the threat of reciprocal tariffs remains if the White House wins its appeal, he said.
Trump could also turn to sector-specific means as he did in his first term or seek congressional approval for tariffs, though this is less likely, Kenningham said.
It is not clear if negotiations will lose steam, Swonk added, given that the administration wants to leverage the threat of tariffs "very aggressively."
Even if the original ruling is eventually upheld, US officials could still buy time to exert pressure on other economies including the European Union and China.
- What about the broader economy? -
The court process "introduces greater ambiguity around the future direction of US trade policy," especially because the appeal is ongoing, said EY chief economist Gregory Daco.
"This legal development amplifies longer-lasting uncertainty for businesses navigating cross-border supply chains," he added in a note.
US stocks closed higher Thursday, but economic fallout has already occurred in recent months with Trump's see-sawing approach to unveiling tariffs and pausing them selectively.
Financial markets have been roiled by policy shifts, and shipping halts due to high tariffs bring disruptions that cannot be cleared overnight, analysts said.
"The fate of the economy remains precarious even if we avert a recession," Swonk said on social media.
T.Zimmermann--VB