
-
Over a dozen Australian suncreams pulled over safety concerns
-
Dodgers down Reds to advance in MLB playoffs, Yankees stay alive
-
Skipper Scott Barrett returns as All Blacks change six for Wallabies Test
-
China's 'Great Green Wall' brings hope but also hardship
-
Let the 'Showgirl' era begin: Taylor Swift's new album is almost here
-
Philippine quake death toll rises to 72
-
Elon Musk halfway to becoming world's first trillionaire: report
-
Surridge penalty lifts Nashville over Austin for US Open Cup
-
Trump jeopardising US role as scientific leader: Nobel officials
-
Gaza aid flotilla presses on despite Israeli interception
-
Asian markets surge on US rate hopes, tech fired by chip deal
-
Trump wants Nobel but 'forgotten' peacemakers more likely, experts say
-
Deepfake political scam ads surge on Meta platforms, watchdog says
-
Yankees, Guardians and Padres stay alive in baseball playoffs
-
Papua New Guinea approves contentious defence treaty with Australia: officials
-
Rescuers search for 59 people trapped under collapsed Indonesian school
-
Two killed as violence flares in Morocco protests
-
Rising wildfires spur comeback for Canadian water bomber
-
G7 ministers to target those increasing Russia oil purchases
-
Australia 'mushroom murderer' Erin Patterson to appeal conviction
-
Guardians, Padres stay alive in first round of baseball playoffs
-
Barca must defend better to reach PSG level: Flick
-
Fitzpatrick blasts 'offensive' PGA chief after Ryder Cup row
-
'Dangerous' Odegaard has freedom to shine for Arsenal, says Arteta
-
PSG stun Barcelona in Champions League, Man City held by Monaco
-
Israeli warships intercept Gaza aid flotilla with Greta onboard
-
Air traffic controllers warn of US shutdown strain
-
'Conservation giant': World reacts to Jane Goodall's death
-
Haaland scores twice but Man City denied by Monaco in Champions League
-
Guirassy helps Dortmund sink Bilbao in Champions League
-
Trump offers security guarantees to Qatar after Israel strikes
-
Ramos snatches Champions League holders PSG late win at Barca
-
Martinelli extends Arsenal's perfect start in Champions League
-
Hojlund and De Bruyne combine to push Napoli past Sporting
-
Russia cut power to defunct Chernobyl nuclear plant, Ukraine says
-
First woman coach breaks barriers in Brazil basketball
-
Gaza aid flotilla says Israeli warships 'intercepted' boats
-
Vinicius, Rodrygo back in Ancelotti's Brazil squad
-
Emery relishes Villa's 'special' Rotterdam visit
-
Colombia gives chunk of druglord Escobar's ranch to conflict victims
-
Gaza aid flotilla says Israeli warships intercepting boats
-
Trump says to push China's Xi on soybeans as US farmers struggle
-
French navy boards Russia 'shadow fleet' ship, arrests two
-
New probe opens into Hunter S. Thompson's 2005 death
-
Renowned British chimpanzee expert Jane Goodall dies at 91
-
Gordon penalties lead Newcastle to big win over Union SG
-
Jane Goodall: crusader for chimpanzees and the planet
-
Thuram set to miss France's World Cup qualifiers with hamstring knock
-
W.House says firings 'imminent' as plan to reopen govt collapses
-
Jane Fonda relaunches Cold War-era Hollywood free speech movement

What comes next in Trump's legal battle over tariffs?
A US federal appeals court has temporarily halted a ruling that found many of President Donald Trump's tariffs illegal, but the chance it could ultimately back the original decision looms over the White House.
What is in the US Court of International Trade's original ruling -- which the Trump administration is appealing -- and what options does the administration have?
- Which tariffs were affected? -
The three-judge trade court ruled Wednesday that Trump overstepped his authority in imposing blanket tariffs by invoking emergency economic powers.
The judgment -- although temporarily halted -- affected levies unveiled on April 2, which involve a 10-percent tariff on most trading partners and higher rates on dozens of economies including China and the European Union. These higher levels are currently suspended while negotiations take place.
The ruling also applies to tariffs imposed on Canada, Mexico and China over their alleged roles in allowing an influx of drugs into the United States.
But it left intact sector-specific levies like those on steel, aluminum and auto imports.
- Why a pause? -
The ruling by the little-known court, which has nationwide jurisdiction over tariff and trade disputes, initially gave the White House 10 days to complete the process of unwinding the levies.
But the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Thursday granted a temporary stay "until further notice" while the Trump administration's appeals process plays out.
This means the tariffs can remain in effect for now, while a longer-term outcome is yet to be determined.
National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett told Fox News the administration is "very pleased with the ruling," dubbing it a victory.
- What are Trump's alternatives? -
The appeals court could eventually uphold the trade court's original decision to block Trump's sweeping tariffs.
The president, however, has other means to reinstate his tariff agenda, said Thibault Denamiel, a fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
These include Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, "which is intended to deal with a balance of payments emergency but does not require a formal investigation," Denamiel told AFP.
The authority restricts tariffs to 15 percent and they can only last 150 days.
But it is among the policy levers that Trump could pull as he seeks a "bridge" towards more lasting actions, said KPMG chief economist Diane Swonk.
Another option is Section 338 of the Trade Act of 1930, allowing the administration to impose tariffs of up to 50 percent on countries that discriminate against the United States, Denamiel said.
- Does this affect trade talks? -
The US trade court's ruling did not remove the threat of US tariffs for Europe or end the need for negotiations, said Andrew Kenningham, chief Europe economist at Capital Economics.
This is because the threat of reciprocal tariffs remains if the White House wins its appeal, he said.
Trump could also turn to sector-specific means as he did in his first term or seek congressional approval for tariffs, though this is less likely, Kenningham said.
It is not clear if negotiations will lose steam, Swonk added, given that the administration wants to leverage the threat of tariffs "very aggressively."
Even if the original ruling is eventually upheld, US officials could still buy time to exert pressure on other economies including the European Union and China.
- What about the broader economy? -
The court process "introduces greater ambiguity around the future direction of US trade policy," especially because the appeal is ongoing, said EY chief economist Gregory Daco.
"This legal development amplifies longer-lasting uncertainty for businesses navigating cross-border supply chains," he added in a note.
US stocks closed higher Thursday, but economic fallout has already occurred in recent months with Trump's see-sawing approach to unveiling tariffs and pausing them selectively.
Financial markets have been roiled by policy shifts, and shipping halts due to high tariffs bring disruptions that cannot be cleared overnight, analysts said.
"The fate of the economy remains precarious even if we avert a recession," Swonk said on social media.
T.Zimmermann--VB