-
Japan to give flanker Haangana his debut against France
-
US wants to globalize fight against far-left terrorism
-
Messi not done yet after inspiring Argentina to World Cup final
-
Familiar tale of woe as England exit World Cup
-
Argentina World Cup semi-final hero Martinez 'dreamt' of scoring winner
-
'For the Malvinas, for Diego!' World Cup glee takes over in Argentina
-
Messi hails 'special' World Cup win over England
-
Argentina players display Falklands banner at World Cup semi-final
-
Tuchel defends tactics after England World Cup dream dies
-
Amnesty warns of 'crimes against humanity' in El Salvador jails
-
Kane 'gutted' after England crash out of World Cup
-
Messi magic sends Argentina into World Cup final
-
Messi's Argentina stun England in comeback to reach World Cup final
-
Amazon defender Raoni leaves hospital a month after surgery
-
US stocks gain after reassuring inflation data, tech giants advance
-
France's parliament adopts assisted dying law
-
EU accepts X's plan to fix digital content violations
-
Amazon to launch S.Africa satellite internet as Starlink awaits licence
-
Toronto air ranked among world's worst as wildfire smoke billows south
-
Top US science body readies climate report as Republicans push back
-
Argentina and England set for World Cup semi-final showdown
-
OpenAI fails to trademark name in EU
-
Argentina protects landmark Obelisk as World Cup madness mounts
-
Toronto air ranked among world's worst as wildfire smoke moves south
-
Tour stage winner Waerenskjold inspired by Manx Missile Cavendish
-
Ahead of World Cup semi-final, Argentine VP calls English 'pirates'
-
Canada central bank holds key rate steady, says economy improving
-
Tech stocks wobble, oil prices slip back
-
Trump tells immigration agents to resume traffic stops despite killings
-
Court rules England World Cup winner died from brain injury linked to heading
-
Hong Kong police raid independent bookstore run by former journalists
-
Waerenskjold wins fastest ever Tour de France stage
-
Castres' ex-All Black Papali'i ruled out for six months
-
Crowds cross Gibraltar-Spain frontier as border controls vanish
-
British Open chiefs have no plan to change schedule if England reach World Cup final
-
Women's rights charity ends Stade Francais deal after McLean arrival
-
Orban's ex-FM quits Hungary parliament for China's BYD
-
McIlroy says fast-running British Open fairways a 'double-edged sword'
-
Up to 45% of dementia risk can be prevented, delayed: WHO
-
Cricket World Cup revamp could see extra India-Pakistan clash
-
Tech stocks lead gains, oil prices rise
-
German leader not opposed to Chinese taking over car plants
-
Bangkok bar fire toll rises to 33 as PM vows venue overhaul
-
Trump tells immigration agents to keep traffic stops despite killings
-
Power restored across Cuba after third outage in two weeks
-
Starmer bids UK MPs 'goodbye', vows to support Burnham
-
France in 'very worrying' drought: minister
-
Sri Lanka expands anti-dengue drive as deaths mount
-
Attempted burglary at Yamal's home after World Cup triumph: police, media
-
Germany's BASF lifts forecasts but Mideast war casts shadow
High Court rules latest UK targets on climate unlawfully 'vague'
The High Court ruled Friday that the UK government had acted unlawfully when it approved elements of its plans to meet net-zero targets based on "vague and unquantified" information.
It is the second time in two years that the court has ruled that ministers are not following the UK's own climate change laws. A judge handed down a similar ruling in 2022.
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, in power since October that year, has faced persistent criticism that he is watering down the country's commitment to net zero targets after a series of climate policy reversals.
Friday's ruling was prompted by on a legal challenge by campaign groups Friends of the Earth, ClientEarth and the Good Law Project. It means ministers must redraft part of their net-zero plans.
"This is another embarrassing defeat for the government and its reckless and inadequate climate plans," Friends of the Earth lawyer Katie de Kauwe said.
The groups took joint legal action against the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero over its decision in March 2023 to approve the Carbon Budget Delivery Plan (CBDP).
The plan outlines how the UK will achieve targets in the country's so-called carbon budget, which runs until 2037, as part of wider efforts to reach net zero by 2050.
They argued that the relevant secretary of state at the time, Grant Shapps, lacked key information on whether individual policies could be delivered but approved them anyway.
That breached the 2008 Climate Change Act, which requires such due diligence on emissions-cutting targets and strategies, said the groups.
High Court judge Clive Sheldon agreed, calling the plan presented to Shapps for sign-off "vague and unquantified" and saying it lacked "sufficient" information.
"It is not possible to ascertain... which of the proposals and policies would not be delivered at all, or in full," he concluded.
A Department for Energy Security and Net Zero spokesperson insisted "the claims in this case were largely about process and the judgment contains no criticism of the detailed plans we have in place.
"We do not believe a court case about process represents the best way of driving progress towards our shared goal of reaching net zero," the spokesperson added.
T.Suter--VB