
-
Spaun wins US Open for first major title with late birdie binge
-
Israel pounds Iran, Tehran hits back with missiles
-
'Thin' chance against Chelsea but nothing to lose: LAFC's Lloris
-
PSG cruise over Atletico, Bayern thrash Auckland at Club World Cup
-
G7 protests hit Calgary with leaders far away
-
USA end losing streak with crushing of hapless Trinidad
-
UK appoints Blaise Metreweli first woman head of MI6 spy service
-
One dead after 6.1-magnitude earthquake in Peru
-
Ciganda ends LPGA title drought with Meijer Classic win
-
Trump suggests Iran, Israel need 'to fight it out' to reach deal
-
Antonelli comes of age with podium finish in Canada
-
PSG cruise as Atletico wilt in Club World Cup opener
-
US Open resumes with Burns leading at rain-soaked Oakmont
-
Hamilton 'devastated' after hitting groundhog in Canada race
-
Piastri accepts Norris apology after Canadian GP collision
-
Heavy rain halts final round of US Open at soaked Oakmont
-
PSG cruise past Atletico to win Club World Cup opener
-
Israel pounds Iran from west to east, Tehran hits back with missiles
-
Burns leads Scott by one as dangerous weather halts US Open
-
Russell triumphs in Canada as McLaren drivers crash
-
Trump vetoed Israeli plan to kill Iranian supreme leader: US official
-
McIlroy seeks Portrush reboot after US Open flop
-
Renault boss Luca de Meo to step down, company says
-
Kubica wins 'mental battle' to triumph at Le Mans
-
Burns seeks first major title at US Open as Scott, Spaun chase
-
Merciless Bayern hit 10 against amateurs Auckland City at Club World Cup
-
'How to Train Your Dragon' soars to top of N.America box office
-
Tens of thousands rally for Gaza in Netherlands, Belgium
-
Duplantis increases pole vault world record to 6.28m
-
Gezora wins Prix de Diane in Graffard masterpiece
-
Pogacar wins first Dauphine ahead of Tour de France title defence
-
Trump due in Canada as G7 confronts Israel-Iran crisis
-
Kubica steers Ferrari to third consecutive 24 Hours of Le Mans
-
French Open champ Alcaraz ready for Queen's after Ibiza party
-
India a voice for Global South at G7, says foreign minister
-
Sinner had 'sleepless nights' after dramatic French Open final loss
-
Gattuso named new Italy coach after Spalletti sacking
-
Relatives lament slow support, wait for remains after India crash
-
Israel vows to make Iran pay 'heavy price' as fighting rages on
-
Macron, on Greenland visit, berates Trump for threats against the territory
-
Qualifier Maria completes fairytale run to Queen's title
-
Gattuso named new Italy coach
-
Tens of thousands rally in Dutch Gaza protest
-
Israel-Iran conflict: latest developments
-
Israel keeps up Iran strikes after deadly missile barrage
-
Ex-president Sarkozy stripped of France's top honour after conviction
-
Iran missiles kill 10 in Israel in night of mutual attacks
-
'This is a culture': TikTok murder highlights Pakistan's unease with women online
-
Families hold funerals for Air India crash victims
-
US Fed set to hold rates steady in the face of Trump pressure

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?
Could a sudden drop in pollution from cargo vessels criss-crossing global shipping lanes be inadvertently making the world hotter?
The main reason for global warming is the heat-trapping emissions from burning fossil fuels.
But scientists have been looking at the extent to which a shift to cleaner, lower-sulphur shipping fuels in 2020 may have fuelled warming by reducing the amount of particles in the atmosphere that reflect heat back into space.
This theory surfaced again when January was declared the hottest on record, extending a streak of exceptional global temperatures that has persisted since mid-2023.
- Why did shipping emissions drop? -
On January 1, 2020, the sulphur content in engine fuel used to power container vessels, oil tankers and other ships in global trade was slashed by decree from 3.5 percent to 0.5 percent.
This was mandated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a UN agency that regulates the global shipping sector, including its environmental impact.
Sulphur oxides in fuels are tiny airborne particles harmful to human health and linked to strokes and the development of lung and cardiovascular diseases.
Some jurisdictions have even tighter restrictions in so-called "emissions control areas" in the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the North American zone and the US marine Caribbean area.
- Is it working? -
The IMO estimated its fuel mandate would cut emissions of sulphur oxide by 8.5 million tonnes a year.
Last June, research published in the academic journal Earth System Science Data reported that sulphur oxide emissions from the shipping industry declined 7.4 million tonnes between 2019 and 2020.
The IMO said that in 2023 just two vessels flagged for inspection were found to be using fuel with a sulphur level above the 0.5 percent requirement.
Since the new regulation came into force, only 67 violations have been recorded.
- Is there a link to global warming? -
Sulphur oxides are not greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane which are effective at trapping heat in the atmosphere, raising global temperatures.
On the contrary, they boost the reflectivity of clouds by making them more mirror-like and capable of bouncing incoming heat from the Sun back into space.
The sudden decline in these particles may have spurred recent warming "but we can't quantify it in an ultra-precise manner", said Olivier Boucher from the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)
He said studies had detected changes in clouds above major shipping lanes since 2020, including a greater presence of larger particles less reflective of sunlight.
Scientists could say shipping emissions had aided warming to some degree "but we are not able to say that it contributes a lot", Boucher added.
One study published in August in the journal Earth's Future concluded that the IMO regulation could increase global surface temperatures by nearly 0.05 degrees Celsius a year up until 2029.
The drastic reduction in airborne sulphur pollution helps to explain the exceptional heat of 2023 but the authors said the magnitude of the temperature extremes meant other factors were likely also at play.
T.Ziegler--VB