-
Volkswagen posts 1-billion-euro loss on tariffs, Porsche woes
-
'Fight fire with fire': California mulls skewing electoral map
-
Fentanyl, beans and Ukraine: Trump hails 'success' in talks with Xi
-
'Nowhere to sleep': Melissa upends life for Jamaicans
-
Irish octogenarian enjoys new lease on life making harps
-
Tanzania blackout after election chaos, deaths feared
-
G7 meets on countering China's critical mineral dominance
-
Trump hails tariff, rare earth deal with Xi
-
Court rules against K-pop group NewJeans in label dispute
-
India's Iyer says 'getting better by the day' after lacerated spleen
-
Yesavage fairytale carries Blue Jays to World Series brink
-
Bank of Japan keeps interest rates unchanged
-
Impoverished Filipinos forge a life among the tombstones
-
Jokic posts fourth straight triple-double as Nuggets rout Pelicans
-
UN calls for end to Sudan siege after mass hospital killings
-
Teenage Australian cricketer dies after being hit by ball
-
As Russia advances on Kupiansk, Ukrainians fear second occupation
-
Trade truce in balance as Trump meets 'tough negotiator' Xi
-
China to send youngest astronaut, mice on space mission this week
-
Yesavage gem carries Blue Jays to brink of World Series as Dodgers downed
-
With inflation under control, ECB to hold rates steady again
-
Asia stocks muted with all eyes on Trump-Xi meeting
-
Personal tipping points: Four people share their climate journeys
-
Moto3 rider Dettwiler 'no longer critical' after crash: family
-
US economy in the dark as government shutdown cuts off crucial data
-
Trump orders nuclear testing resumption ahead of Xi talks
-
'Utter madness': NZ farmers agree dairy sale to French group
-
Samsung posts 32% profit rise on-year in third quarter
-
30 years after cliffhanger vote, Quebec separatists voice hope for independence
-
Taxes, labor laws, pensions: what Milei wants to do next
-
South Sudan's blind football team dreams of Paralympic glory
-
US says 4 killed in new strike on alleged Pacific drug boat
-
What we do and don't know about Rio's deadly police raid
-
'They slit my son's throat' says mother of teen killed in Rio police raid
-
Arteta hails 'special' Dowman after 15-year-old makes historic Arsenal start
-
Google parent Alphabet posts first $100 bn quarter as AI fuels growth
-
Underwater 'human habitat' aims to allow researchers to make weeklong dives
-
Maresca slams Delap for 'stupid' red card in Chelsea win at Wolves
-
'Non-interventionist' Trump flexes muscles in Latin America
-
Slot defends League Cup selection despite not meeting 'Liverpool standards'
-
'Poor' PSG retain Ligue 1 lead despite stalemate and Doue injury
-
Liverpool crisis mounts after League Cup exit against Palace
-
Kane scores twice as Bayern set European wins record
-
Radio Free Asia suspends operations after Trump cuts and shutdown
-
Meta shares sink as $16 bn US tax charge tanks profit
-
Dollar rises after Fed chair says December rate cut not a given
-
Google parent Alphabet posts first $100 bn quarter as AI drives growth
-
Rob Jetten: ex-athlete setting the pace in Dutch politics
-
Juve bounce back after Tudor sacking as Roma keep pace with leaders Napoli
-
Favorite Sovereignty scratched from Breeders' Cup Classic after fever
Three decades ago world told to 'act now' on climate
With the planet facing the "potentially serious consequences" of global warming, UN experts writing 32 years ago urged an indifferent world to take immediate action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Planet-warming carbon pollution has increased ever since.
In 1990 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change produced the first trio of reports in a cycle of climate change assessments -- one on the physical science of warming, one on the impacts and one on solutions -- that has repeated roughly every six years.
While the authors of the most recent IPCC report on impacts, released in February this year, can say the evidence of harm to humanity and the entire planet is "unequivocal", the authors of those first reports 30 years ago could not be as forthright.
But they were clear that the risks were so high we couldn't afford to wait.
"The potentially serious consequences of climate change on the global environment," they said "give sufficient reasons to begin by adopting response strategies that can be justified immediately even in the face of such significant uncertainties".
They said cuts to the planet-warming gases that humans were pumping into the atmosphere should be swift and drastic.
"Because climate change could potentially result in significant impacts on the global environment and human activities, it is important to begin considering now what measures might be taken in response," the report said.
There was never an easy answer.
The scientists writing the 1990 report underscored the need to reduce emissions of different gases -- especially carbon dioxide and methane -- across a range of different sectors, from energy generation to agriculture.
"Our understanding has been refined over 40 years, but the alarm has been ringing since the first IPCC report," said Celine Guivarch, one of the authors of the latest IPCC assessment of solutions, set to be published on April 4.
With each new cycle of climate evaluation, the description of risks in the IPCC reports has become ever clearer and more urgent. The forecasts have become increasingly catastrophic.
Meanwhile, emissions have risen almost every year, only breaking their relentless pace because of major economic crises, such as the one triggered by the Covid-19 pandemic.
As a result, CO2 in the atmosphere has never been higher.
According to data from the Mauna Loa observatory in Hawaii, which has monitored the atmosphere for decades, C02 concentrations reached 416 parts per million in 2021, up from 354 ppm in 1990 when the first IPCC report was published.
Earth has experienced periods of much higher C02 concentrations in the distant past.
But in its report on the physical science released in August 2021, the IPCC said the rate the gas has increased in the atmosphere since 1900 "is at least 10 times faster than at any other time during the last 800,000 years".
"Current levels of atmospheric CO2 have not been experienced for at least two million years," it added.
L.Dubois--BTB