-
Stocks move lower despite oil prices dropping
-
Brazil's patron saint pulled into latest election scrap
-
AI driving up innovation investment: UN
-
Football overload leaves players near 'breaking point', warns Tebas
-
UN Security Council extends Haiti mission by 6 months
-
Paris Eiffel Tower says chief to step down after uproar over removing women staff
-
Man Utd do not deserve medals if Man City stripped of titles: Rooney
-
Amaze Holdings (NYSE: AMZE) Executes Binding LOI to Acquire BullionFX | Alchemy, a Decentralized Gold-Backed Financial Ecosystem for Valued at US$155 Million
-
Vana Completes Expanded Staking as Part of the Vega Upgrade, Publishes Expanded VANA Token Economics
-
Clashes between French teens, police as school blockades intensify
-
Spain to cap gas price hikes, extend fuel discounts
-
Stocks move sideways despite oil moving lower
-
'We just need rain': Germany's Rhine river hits new low
-
African leaders to gather in Egypt for business summit
-
Yemen health system at 'breaking point': WHO
-
UK decides against charging foreign visitors for museums
-
Ireland undecided on second Israel match: coach
-
Dallaglio to sell England World Cup winners' medal
-
France's Le Pen defiant after top ally hit by antisemitism claims
-
Brazil come from behind to beat Australia 4-2 in friendly
-
Tom Cruise trades stunts for satire as toxic tycoon 'Digger'
-
Ruthless An retains Asian Games badminton crown as Kunlavut triumphs
-
MEXC Unveils "WE SEE YOU" Brand Visual Refresh, Putting People Behind Every Trade in Focus
-
Alonso to stay with F1 team Aston Martin in 2027
-
Thai capital cleans up after deadly floods
-
China badminton 'still strong' despite Asian Games slump
-
NATO, EU allies rally to Estonia after 'sabotage' blamed on Russia
-
'Exceptional' Turner painting shown in Rome before sale
-
Families demand justice for Cameroon's 'nightmare' wave of murdered women
-
European stocks climb as oil dips
-
Tebas says Man City should face 'most severe' sanctions if guilty of rule breaches
-
Spain aims to ban evictions until 2030 amid housing protests
-
Pochettino calls Man City success 'a period of deception'
-
Kunlavut first Thai man to win Asian Games badminton singles gold
-
Settler attack on West Bank village injures Israeli forces, drawing rare rebuke
-
French far right says antisemitism claims part of 'total war' to derail presidency bid
-
Mystery over UK airbase scare after reports no explosives found
-
'Gift from God': Rain brings relief from Indonesia toxic haze
-
Spanish govt races to adopt housing law under protest pressure
-
Ex-world snooker champion jailed for 7 years for child sex crimes
-
Estonia slams Russian 'sabotage' after arson attack on defence company
-
French teens clash with police as school blockades intensify
-
Slovenia sees surge in '.si' sites after Trump hypes 'super intelligence'
-
FIFA accuses UEFA of 'misinformation campaign' in bid for World Cup papers
-
'Like a dream' for An as Games organisers 'sorry' for latest mix-up
-
Myanmar airstrike toll hits 50 as families gather dead
-
Tokyo suffers longest streak of rainy days on record
-
STARTRADER Raises Lloyd's of London Client Fund Insurance to USD 30 Million in Aggregate
-
Indonesia charges train driver over crash that killed 16 women
-
North Korean DMZ landmine blasts 'violation of armistice': Seoul
South Korea court recognises rights of same-sex couples
South Korea's Supreme Court recognised new rights for same-sex couples Thursday, saying the state must provide health insurance for a gay man's partner in a landmark ruling that left activists weeping for joy.
"National Health Insurance should recognise spousal insurance coverage for same-sex couples," the court ruled, with activists breaking into cheers as the verdict was read out.
The verdict, which cannot be appealed as it comes from the country's highest court, means common-law spouses of the same sex can now register as dependents on their partners' health insurance.
"It is discrimination based on sexual orientation to exclude the couple just because they are same-sex," the court ruled.
"It is a discriminatory act that violates human dignity and values, the right to pursue happiness, freedom of privacy, and the right to be equal before the law, and the degree of infringement is serious."
The case was brought by a gay couple, So Seong-wook and Kim Yong-min, who live together and held a wedding ceremony in 2019.
It had no legal validity, however, as South Korea does not recognise same-sex marriage.
In 2021, So sued the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) because it terminated benefits for his partner -- whom he had registered as a dependent -- after discovering they were a gay couple.
In a landmark ruling last year, a Seoul High Court found in favour of the couple, mandating that the NHIS reinstate the dependent benefits.
The service, which grants spousal coverage benefits to common-law partners, appealed the decision, escalating the case to the Supreme Court.
- 'Historic victory' -
The Supreme Court ruling is a pivotal moment for the country's LGBTQI community, and people holding rainbow umbrellas walked out of the court, wiping away tears of joy.
While the country does not recognise same-sex marriages, gay relationships are not criminalised. LGBTQ people tend to live largely under the radar.
Activists have long emphasised the need for legislation against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
A much-discussed anti-discrimination law has languished in the South Korean parliament for years, due to a lack of consensus among MPs.
Outside the court ahead of the verdict, anti-LGBTQI Christian organisations staged a protest, holding up banners saying "let us repent to the Lord".
When the couple So Seong-wook and Kim Yong-min attempted to hold a press conference after the verdict, Christian activists disrupted it by speaking in tongues and shouting: "homosexuality is a sin!"
Amnesty International said the ruling was "a historic victory for equality and human rights in South Korea".
"The Court has taken a significant step towards dismantling systemic discrimination and ensuring inclusivity for all," the rights group said in a statement.
"While this decision is a major milestone, the case itself is a sobering reminder of the lengthy judicial processes that same-sex couples must endure to secure basic rights that should be universally guaranteed.
"It is disheartening that in 2024, same-sex couples still face such significant barriers to equality."
H.Weber--VB