-
No penalty practice? No problem for Man City in shoot-out win
-
Argentine football fan jailed for threats over Di Maria return
-
Microsoft beats expectations fueled by Azure cloud business
-
Liverpool beat Chelsea in League Cup shoot-out, Man City survive scare
-
Chelsea win as Bayern draw with Madrid in Women's Champions League
-
Inter leave it late again in Serie A as AC Milan, Juventus lose
-
Kane watches as Bayern cruise into German Cup last 16
-
Shares in Google owner Alphabet plummet on profit miss, ad slowdown
-
Bayern boss Kompany out of hospital after meningeal irritation
-
Putin hails Elon Musk as 'truly a genius'
-
Shares in Google owner Alphabet sink on profit miss, ad slowdown
-
US stocks eye big tech earnings as Fed holds rates steady
-
Chelsea win as Bayern and Madrid draw in Women's Champions League
-
US Fed holds interest rates steady despite 'too high' inflation
-
Made with munitions from the Falklands War, a 'Chalice of Peace' for the pope
-
Rwanda cannot be blamed for what happens in DR Congo, FM says
-
Pioneering US labor leader Dolores Huerta dies at 96
-
Inter leave it late again in Serie A as Bologna sink AC Milan
-
Italian PM slams 'shameful' release of alleged protest organiser
-
Bolsonaro's escape to the US: How it happened
-
Hollywood producer Kennedy to head LA28 Olympic ceremony plans
-
Russell calls on Scotland to 'kick on' and beat big teams
-
Djokovic wins Basel opener to boost ATP Finals bid
-
Airbus aims for record deliveries despite disappointing quarter
-
US Fed holds interest rates steady despite surging inflation
-
Cuba wins UN vote against US embargo with weakest backing in 30 years
-
Chiefs sign ex-Ravens kicker suspended over sex allegations
-
Real Madrid, La Liga apology over Mbappe shows power of Chinese market
-
Inglis and Carey put Australia in command of South Africa decider
-
From Gaza to Ramallah, Palestinians see little hope in Israeli vote
-
92-year-old US judge handling Maduro case dies
-
US labor leader Dolores Huerta dead: family
-
Perez extends Cadillac deal to 2029
-
Investors turn cautious ahead of tech results, Fed update on rates
-
Arab Israelis proud of high election turnout, uncertain for future
-
'Cruise for life' strands passengers in Cambodia as operator goes bust
-
Inglis, Carey put Australia in command of South Africa decider
-
Bolsonaro flees Brazil for US after election defeat
-
French firm Safran helps build aircraft wings of the future in UK factory
-
A throne on wheels, popemobiles star in new Vatican show
-
Ceasefire in Russia-occupied Ukrainian city holds for second day
-
Spain high-speed train crash kills 68, injures over 100
-
Canada hikes rates to contain oil price surge caused by Iran war
-
UK woman drugged by husband tells rape trial she woke up bound
-
World Bank warns of worsening food insecurity as commodity prices soar
-
Clean-up starts as Serbian students movement prepares to govern
-
Mona Lisa scrubbed from Syrian textbooks as critics slam conservative drift
-
Flavio Bolsonaro: right-wing heir falls from presidential hopeful to exile
-
Bolsonaro flees Brazil for US after election defeat: AFP
-
UK budget lifts bank tax to offset surging energy bills
Ukraine plans international court to put Putin on trial
Six months into Russia's invasion, Ukrainian officials are drawing up plans to make sure Russian President Vladimir Putin and his top military commanders will be tried for launching the war.
The plan for a special international tribunal to investigate Russia's alleged "crime of aggression" is being spearheaded by Andrii Smirnov, deputy head of Ukraine's presidential administration.
The definition of the crime of aggression was adopted in the 2010 Rome Statute, and the similar notion of "crime against peace" was used in trials in Nuremberg and Tokyo after the Second World War.
The International Criminal Court, which has been trying the gravest crimes for the past 20 years, is already investigating war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide in Ukraine.
But it cannot look into accusations of aggression because neither Ukraine nor Russia have ratified the Rome Statute.
This court is "the only way to make sure that the criminals who started the Ukraine war are held accountable quickly," Smirnov told AFP.
"The world has a short memory. That's why I would like this tribunal to start working next year."
Ukraine knows that the accused will not be present, but this tribunal "will serve to make sure that these people are labelled as criminals, and that they cannot travel in the civilized world," he said.
- International treaty drafted -
Ukrainian prosecutors have identified some 600 suspects in the aggression so far, including senior military officials, politicians and commentators.
An international treaty to set up the tribunal has been drafted, ready to be signed by governments.
The court's decisions would then be recognised on the territory of the signatory countries, which means that any convicted offenders could be arrested there.
Smirnov said several countries are set to sign the document before the end of the year and negotiations are ongoing with "several European partners (who) are willing to host the tribunal."
"We want this court's decisions to be recognised" he said, arguing he "perfectly understands" that the court needs strong legitimacy.
Despite several reforms, Ukraine courts have been criticised for lack of independence and corruption in the past.
While Poland and the Baltic states -- Ukraine's closest partners -- have been very supportive of the proposals, Germany and France have given more measured reactions.
Political considerations may explain this.
"Some countries, while acknowledging the aggression against Ukraine, are trying to keep a small window for negotiations with Vladimir Putin open," Smirnov said.
But, even in Western Europe, support is slowly building for the idea.
The European Parliament called for a special international tribunal for crimes of aggression on May 19.
And, speaking at an international conference on war crimes in Ukraine in The Hague last month, Dutch Foreign Minister Wopke Hoekstra said the question of a special court was a "very valid point".
F.Müller--BTB