-
Nations commit to get nature goals back on track
-
OKC's Holmgren to miss at least eight weeks as Thunder injury woes deepen
-
US oil companies aim to squeeze more out of refineries
-
'Not very smart' - Verstappen slams Red Bull stable-mate after clash
-
Leclerc quickest in Mexico GP practice
-
Trump admin approves potential Patriot missiles sale to Ukraine
-
Polish riot police deployed as deposed court chief sets off crisis
-
Sun Goddess wins at Breeders' Cup, O'Brien leads Baffert
-
Young Canadians focus on mental health at key climate trial
-
Nations agree push to get nature goals on track
-
'Breath of fresh air' truce brings hope to Ukraine's ravaged Kherson
-
Leclerc shows practice pace as Antonelli prowls in Mexico
-
British king reflects on colonial atrocities in Guyana
-
Trump, Milei under pressure to explain Bolsonaro flight from Brazil
-
Nations agree crucial texts in overtime at UN nature summit
-
Hakimi bags hat-trick as Paris Saint-Germain rip Le Havre to pieces
-
NBA Trail Blazers lose guard Morant for four weeks
-
Polish riot police deployed after court chief suspended
-
UN nature summit in extra time as nations grapple for deal
-
Emery's focus fully on Fulham despite Barcelona tie
-
Complaints upheld against Swiss TV commentary on Israeli bobsleigher
-
Reigning champs chase history in New York Marathon
-
Tielemans glad Man Utd sticking with Carrick
-
Monaco taken off global money-laundering 'grey list'
-
Scottish police probe Andrew, Epstein stay at royal castle: UK media
-
Canada, EU launch new alliance with deals on Ukraine, minerals, AI
-
Medvedev into Vienna semis and books ATP Finals place
-
Tears, fear, anger: relatives of Spain train crash dead await fate
-
UN nature talks in extra time as nations struggle to reach deal
-
Spurs get Maddison boost ahead of Palace clash
-
Meta settles, leaving Snap sole defendant in new social media trial
-
French authorities fear new street violence at Halloween protests
-
Chelsea manager Alonso dismisses talk of Estevao loan deal
-
Rickelton, Mulder centuries lift South Africa's chances in Test decider
-
Thousands of students, workers hold peaceful protests in Italy
-
Maresca adamant Donnarumma can be dropped but first name selected
-
Iraola glad to raise Liverpool fans' hopes but says hard work ahead
-
EU and Canada to 'withstand shocks together' with new alliance
-
Pope Leo makes history with US midterm vote
-
Flick praises Yamal 'mentality' after missing out on Ballon d'Or
-
Arsenal boss Arteta fires 'Disneyland' warning at Dowman after Fleetwood red card
-
Binance heist: How were cryptocurrency billions stolen?
-
Russia's ice hockey stars come in from the cold after CAS ruling
-
France boards up ahead of Halloween protests
-
Wall Street tech rout deepens on doubts over AI spending
-
Is Bukele's troop deployment in Haiti just a rescue mission?
-
'Life in the old dog': German economy grows more than expected
-
Relatives' anguish grows as Spain identifies train crash dead
-
England great Anderson asks what's 'wrong with me?' after Lancashire exit
-
Italy inflation surges to 5.4% as economy stalls
Biden's student debt relief plan challenged at Supreme Court
The US Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday in a challenge to President Joe Biden's plan to erase nearly $400 billion of student debt, with all eyes on how far the conservative-dominated bench is willing to go to override the Democratic leader.
The court's ruling, expected before June 30, will decide whether millions of Americans will see up to $20,000 of debt disappear, but could also have implications for future presidential actions.
About 200 protesters gathered outside the court, carrying signs backing Biden's policy.
Lamar Brooks, 22, an African American student from Baltimore, said he already had $18,000 of debt and expected the sum to rocket as he hopes to study to become a psychiatrist.
"I could benefit, and also it will help other minorities as well," he told AFP, saying student debt was a "generational financial burden."
Relying on a Covid-related legal justification, Biden announced his student loan forgiveness plan last August, shortly before the crucial midterm elections.
"This relief is critical to over 40 million Americans as they recover from the economic crisis caused by the pandemic," he tweeted early Tuesday.
"We're confident it's legal. And we're fighting for it in court."
Republican-led states were quick to claim he had overreached his authority and an appellate court halted the measure in November.
Under the relief plan, $10,000 would be cut from all loans owed by people earning less than $125,000 per year. For students who went to university with need-based government assistance known as Pell grants, the relief would be $20,000.
In addition to the coalition of Republican states, two students have also filed suit arguing they were unjustly excluded from the program.
During his 2020 campaign, Biden pledged to act to address the massive amounts of debt US students take on to attend higher education -- the White House says nearly 43 million Americans hold $1.6 trillion in federal student loans.
- Wide range of outcomes -
In the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic, then-president Donald Trump ordered a halt to all federal student loan repayments, citing a 2003 law permitting such actions during a "national emergency."
That pause has since been repeatedly renewed, and is currently set to expire in mid-2023.
The Biden administration argues the same law allows for blanket debt cancellation in response to a "once-in-a-century pandemic that starkly disrupted the Nation's economy and borrowers' ability to repay their loans."
Conservatives claim Biden has used the pandemic as a broad excuse to sidestep Congress.
That argument could prevail in the Supreme Court, which has already moved to overturn multiple Covid-related policies issued by the Democratic administration, including on vaccine mandates and a moratorium on evictions.
Biden's Justice Department contends that the Republican states have no legal standing to bring the case as they have "suffered no cognizable injury," and that the two students' challenge is overly broad.
For their part, Republicans are hoping that the panel's 6-3 conservative majority will issue a broad ruling to limit presidential authority, saying that on such important issues the US Constitution requires clear authorization from Congress.
The court used this "major questions doctrine" last June to restrict the powers of the Environmental Protection Agency in its fight against global warming.
If the court further strengthens the doctrine, the Biden administration may find itself unable to act on crucial issues at a time when Congress itself is paralyzed by partisan divisions.
O.Bulka--BTB