-
EU chief says pressure off for lower Russia oil price cap
-
France to hold next G7 summit in Evian spa town
-
Alcaraz wins testing Queen's opener, Fritz, Shelton out
-
Argentine ex-president Kirchner to serve prison term at home
-
Iran confronts Trump with toughest choice yet
-
UK MPs vote to decriminalise abortion for women in all cases
-
R. Kelly lawyers allege he was target of 'overdose' plot by prison guards
-
Tom Cruise to receive honorary Oscar in career first
-
Organised crime and murder: top Inter and AC Milan ultras imprisoned
-
Dortmund held by Fluminense at Club World Cup
-
Samsonova downs Osaka as Keys crashes out in Berlin
-
Trump says won't kill Iran's Khamenei 'for now' as Israel presses campaign
-
Tanaka and Murao strike more gold for Japan at judo worlds
-
Alfred Brendel: the 'Thinking Pianist's Man'
-
Trump says EU not offering 'fair deal' on trade
-
G7 rallies behind Ukraine after abrupt Trump exit
-
England 'keeper Hampton keen to step out from Earps' shadow
-
Austrian pianist Alfred Brendel dies at 94: spokesman
-
Brazil sells exploration rights to oil blocks near Amazon river mouth
-
Escalation or diplomacy? Outcome of Iran-Israel conflict uncertain
-
Field of Gold sparkles on opening day of Royal Ascot
-
Alcaraz wins testing Queen's opener, Draper cruises
-
'Second time I've died': Nobel laureate Jelinek denies death reports
-
Swiss insurers estimate glacier damage at $393 mn
-
Premiership club Gloucester sign All Blacks prop Laulala
-
Spain says 'overvoltage' caused huge April blackout
-
Record stand puts Bangladesh in command in first Sri Lanka Test
-
Galthie defends second-string France squad for New Zealand tour
-
China's Xi in Kazakhstan to cement 'eternal' Central Asia ties
-
How much damage has Israel inflicted on Iran's nuclear programme?
-
Male victim breaks 'suffocating' silence on Kosovo war rapes
-
Disgraced referee Coote charged by FA over Klopp remarks
-
Queer astronaut documentary takes on new meaning in Trump's US
-
UK startup looks to cut shipping's carbon emissions
-
Roma not aiming for Serie A title 'but you never know', says Gasperini
-
UK automakers cheer US trade deal, as steel tariffs left in limbo
-
Pope Leo XIV to revive papal holidays at summer palace
-
French ex-PM Fillon given suspended sentence over wife's fake job
-
US retail sales slip more than expected after rush to beat tariffs
-
Farrell has no regrets over short France stint with Racing 92
-
Global oil demand to dip in 2030, first drop since Covid: IEA
-
Indonesia volcano spews colossal ash tower, alert level raised
-
Dutch suggest social media ban for under-15s
-
Russian strikes kill 16 in 'horrific' attack on Kyiv
-
Gaza rescuers say Israel army kills more than 50 people near aid site
-
Tehranis caught between fear and resolve as air war intensifies
-
Trump says wants 'real end' to Israel-Iran conflict, not ceasefire
-
Poll finds public turning to AI bots for news updates
-
'Spectacular' Viking burial site discovered in Denmark
-
Why stablecoins are gaining popularity
China, Trump, and the power of war?
As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.
Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions
Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.
Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.
Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.
The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response
Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.
Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.
Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.
Potential Military Scenarios
Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.
Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.
Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.
Risks and Global Ramifications
Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.
Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.
International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.
Diplomatic Alternatives
Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.
Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.
In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.

Zelenskyy: ‘What worked in Israel work also in Ukraine’

Electric car crisis: Future of a Audi plant?

Vladimir Putin, War criminal and Dictator of Russia

EU vs. Hungary: Lawsuit over ‘national sovereignty’ law

Ukraine: Zelenskyy appeals for international aid

Lebanon: Is a new wave of refugees coming to the EU?

Terrorist state Iran attacks Israel with missiles

Belarus: ICC investigates dictator Lukashenko

NATO: Ukraine ‘at the top of the list!’

NATO is training to fight cyber attacks

Digital Ocean Twin: Protecting the Oceans
