-
Australia's Cummins hints at return for second Ashes Test
-
Boeing settles with one plaintiff in 737 MAX crash trial
-
Man City win as Inter stay perfect, Barca held in Champions League
-
French superstar DJ Snake wants new album to 'build bridges'
-
Barca rescue draw at Club Brugge in six-goal thriller
-
Foden hits top form as Man City thrash Dortmund
-
NBA officials brief Congress committee over gambling probe
-
Inter beat Kairat Almaty to maintain Champions League perfection
-
Newcastle sink Bilbao to extend Champions League winning run
-
Wall Street stocks rebound after positive jobs data
-
LPGA, European tour partner with Saudis for new Vegas event
-
Eyes turn to space to feed power-hungry data centers
-
Jazz lose Kessler for season with shoulder injury
-
League scoring leader Messi among MLS Best XI squad
-
MLS bans Suarez for Miami's winner-take-all playoff match
-
McIlroy appreciates PGA of America apology for Ryder Cup abuse
-
Garnacho equaliser saves Chelsea in Qarabag draw
-
Promotions lift McDonald's sales in tricky consumer market
-
Five things to know about New York's new mayor
-
Anisimova beats Swiatek to reach WTA Finals last four
-
US Supreme Court appears skeptical of Trump tariff legality
-
AC Milan post third straight annual profit on day of San Siro purchase
-
Angelina Jolie visits Ukrainian frontline city, media reports say
-
UN says forests should form key plank of COP30
-
Star designer Rousteing quits fashion group Balmain
-
Mexico's Sheinbaum steps up cartel fight after murder of anti-narco mayor
-
Attack on funeral in Sudan's Kordofan region kills 40: UN
-
Key PSG trio set for spell on sidelines
-
Democrats punch back in US elections - and see hope for 2026
-
BMW reports rising profitability, shares jump
-
Bolivia Supreme Court orders release of jailed ex-president Jeanine Anez
-
Wall Street stocks rise after positive jobs data
-
'Hostage diplomacy': longstanding Iran tactic presenting dilemma for West
-
Rybakina stays perfect at WTA Finals with win over alternate Alexandrova
-
Le Garrec welcomes Dupont help in training for Springboks showdown
-
Brussels wants high-speed rail linking EU capitals by 2040
-
Swiss business chiefs met Trump on tariffs: Bern
-
Spain's exiled king recounts history, scandals in wistful memoir
-
Wall Street stocks steady after positive jobs data
-
Trump blasts Democrats as government shutdown becomes longest ever
-
Indian pilgrims find 'warm welcome' in Pakistan despite tensions
-
Inter and AC Milan complete purchase of San Siro
-
Swedish authorities inspect worksite conditions at steel startup Stegra
-
Keys withdraws from WTA Finals with illness
-
Prince Harry says proud to be British despite new life in US
-
EU strikes last-ditch deal on climate targets as COP30 looms
-
Stocks retreat as tech bubble fears grow
-
Shein opens first permanent store amid heavy police presence
-
West Indies edge New Zealand despite Santner brilliance
-
French pair released by Iran await return home
Boomers: Selfish or Scapegoats?
The debate over whether the Baby Boomer generation—those born between 1946 and 1964—deserves the label of "the most selfish generation in history" has intensified in recent years. Critics argue that Boomers have prioritised their own comfort and prosperity at the expense of future generations, while defenders point to their contributions to social progress and economic growth. This article explores both sides of the argument, drawing on economic, social, and cultural factors to assess the validity of the claim.
A Generation of Prosperity
The post-World War II era was a time of unprecedented economic growth, particularly in Western nations. Boomers grew up in a period of relative stability and prosperity, benefiting from expanding educational opportunities, affordable housing, and a booming job market. This generation was the first to enjoy the fruits of modern consumer culture, with access to new technologies, healthcare advancements, and a welfare state that provided a safety net. However, this prosperity has been criticised as a double-edged sword. While Boomers thrived, they are accused of failing to address long-term challenges such as climate change, economic inequality, and the sustainability of social security systems. The argument goes that their focus on short-term gains has left younger generations—particularly Millennials and Generation Z—facing a future of environmental degradation, housing crises, and precarious employment.
The Burden of Debt
One of the most frequently cited examples of Boomer selfishness is their approach to public debt. Over the past few decades, national debts have soared in many countries, driven by policies that prioritised tax cuts, increased spending on entitlements, and economic stimulus measures. Critics argue that Boomers, who have held political and economic power during this period, have been complicit in passing on this financial burden to future generations. The rising cost of healthcare, pensions, and social security, combined with stagnating wages for younger workers, has fuelled resentment. In some nations, national debt has increased dramatically since the turn of the century, a period during which Boomers dominated leadership positions. This fiscal irresponsibility, some argue, reflects a generational disregard for the future.
The Housing Divide
Housing is another area where Boomers are accused of hoarding wealth. In many developed countries, property prices have skyrocketed, making homeownership increasingly unattainable for younger generations. Boomers, who bought homes when prices were relatively low, have seen their property values soar, creating a wealth gap that is difficult for Millennials and Gen Z to bridge. Over the past few decades, average house prices have risen significantly while wages have remained largely stagnant. This has led to accusations that Boomers have pulled up the ladder behind them, benefiting from policies that favoured property ownership while younger generations are left renting or struggling to save for deposits.
A Legacy of Progress
However, it would be unfair to paint the entire generation with the same brush. Boomers have also been responsible for significant social progress. The civil rights movements of the 1960s and 1970s, which fought for racial equality, gender rights, and LGBTQ+ inclusion, were largely driven by Boomer activists. Their contributions to technology, healthcare, and education have also been transformative. The digital revolution, which laid the foundation for the modern internet and communication technologies, was spearheaded by Boomer innovators. Moreover, many Boomers have engaged in philanthropy and community service, challenging the notion that they are universally selfish.
Generational Perceptions
Another important factor to consider is the role of generational differences in shaping perceptions of selfishness. Younger generations, facing economic uncertainty and environmental crises, may view Boomers' actions through a lens of frustration. However, it is worth noting that every generation has faced criticism from its successors. The Silent Generation, who preceded the Boomers, were often derided for their conformity and conservatism, while Millennials have been labelled as entitled and overly reliant on technology. This cyclical nature of generational criticism suggests that the "selfish" label may be more a reflection of changing societal values than an objective truth.
Structural Influences
Furthermore, the accusation of selfishness overlooks the structural factors that have shaped Boomer behaviour. The economic policies of the late 20th century, particularly the rise of neoliberalism, encouraged individualism and short-term thinking. Boomers, like all generations, were influenced by the prevailing ideologies of their time. The shift towards deregulation, privatisation, and globalisation was not solely a Boomer creation but a broader political and economic trend. To single out Boomers as uniquely selfish ignores the complex interplay of historical forces that have shaped modern society.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while there is evidence to suggest that the Boomer generation has benefited disproportionately from economic and social conditions, labelling them as "the most selfish generation in history" is an oversimplification. Their contributions to social progress and innovation cannot be ignored, nor can the structural factors that have influenced their behaviour. The intergenerational debate is likely to continue, but it is essential to approach it with nuance, recognising that each generation operates within the constraints and opportunities of its time.
Germany: The fight against economic migrants
Polish PM and the danger of asylum seekers
Ukraine: Recruiters searched Kyiv venues
EU: Austrian elections shake Establishment
Terrorist state Iran: ‘We are ready to attack Israel again’
EU: Greenpeace warns of dying farms
EU: Tariffs on all Chinese electric Cars
Zelenskyy: ‘What worked in Israel work also in Ukraine’
Electric car crisis: Future of a Audi plant?
Vladimir Putin, War criminal and Dictator of Russia
EU vs. Hungary: Lawsuit over ‘national sovereignty’ law