-
Colombian judge bans strikes on guerrillas if minors are present
-
Carreras reverts to fullback as Argentina change four for Australia Test
-
Khachanov shocks ailing Auger-Aliassime, Swiatek and Osaka advance at US Open
-
Wilson back to lead Australia as Kiss rotates team for Argentina
-
Lone juror blocking verdict in US mother's child murder trial: defense
-
Yen surges on new intervention talk, US stocks rally
-
'Kinda chic' - Williams sisters set to launch US Open doubles bid
-
Japan's Ueda fires Lille top of Ligue 1 on debut
-
Volkswagen says cutting 100,000 jobs by end of decade
-
Arsenal chief executive reveals 'dynasty' ambition
-
Russia slaps curfew on charity director over army criticism
-
Spanish PM says no 'solid proof' Morocco planned migrant rush
-
Ailing Auger-Aliassime upset by Khachanov at US Open
-
Iran war is not a war, US VP Vance says
-
Richarlison omitted from Tottenham's Premier League squad
-
Khachanov stuns third-seeded Auger-Aliassime in US Open second round
-
How El Nino is choking the Panama Canal
-
Bordeaux facing sixth-tier football after French federation upholds relegation
-
Hamilton drives his Ferrari dream at Monza
-
Stoic Verstappen looking beyond 'painful' Monza weekend
-
Senegal has an IMF loan, now what?
-
OpenAI begins rollout of new powerful AI model GPT-6 Astra
-
Auger-Aliassime upset by Khachanov at US Open
-
FIFA blasts UEFA 'smear campaign,' fights World Cup plan disclosures
-
Hugging Face, the French start-up that became AI's warehouse
-
Zelensky hopes to host US envoys in Kyiv in 'coming days'
-
World Cup winner Llorente retires from Spain team at 31
-
Martinelli joins Al-Hilal from Arsenal for reported £60 million
-
Osaka squeezes into US Open third round
-
Tesla's semi-autonomous driving could be adapted to EU norms: France
-
Apple faces £2 bn lawsuit in UK over app privacy feature
-
37 people die from fumes during oil pipeline theft in Nigeria: NGO
-
Former champ Swiatek eases into US Open third round
-
Ahead of elections, Israel tests West's patience on West Bank violence
-
DR Congo latest to promise moving Israel embassy to Jerusalem
-
Antonelli will obey Mercedes orders to help 'tow' teammate Russell
-
War criminal Mladic's body returns to Serbia with military honours
-
UK fintech Revolut gains conditional US banking licence
-
Pierre Cardin museum brings designer's futurist style to Venice
-
Mara sisters channel childhood energy for twins performance at Venice
-
Slovenian rookie Omrzel triumphs as Mas extends Vuelta lead
-
UN's Sudan probe says foreign fighters fuelling conflict
-
British, French leaders talk migrants, EU relations
-
Violence erupts at S.Africa anti-migrant protest
-
Heading for Ferrari's home race, Leclerc still dreams of world title
-
Nothing left: Nepal flood survivors face loss and uncertainty
-
Cafe at centre of Israel culture clash agrees to shut on Sabbath
-
Tesla to launch self-driving 'Cybercab' in Texas
-
Spacecraft bound for Mercury begins 'tricky' arrival
-
Europe struggles to respond as Russia escalates shadow warfare
US Supreme Court rules on dragnet searches of cellphone location data
The US Supreme Court on Monday ruled partially in favor of a man challenging the use of sweeping "geofence" searches of cellphone location data in his robbery conviction, sending the case back to a lower court for further consideration.
The court, in a 6-3 ruling, said that such searches -- which scan for every phone in a certain place at a specific time -- implicate the US Constitution's Fourth Amendment protections against "unreasonable searches and seizures."
However it said that a lower court would have to determine if the use of the search in the case at hand was in fact reasonable.
The case was brought by Okello Chatrie, identified as a suspect in a 2019 Virginia bank robbery after investigators obtained a warrant to search cellphone location data stored by Google.
Chatrie, who was armed with a gun and made off with $195,000, was eventually convicted and is serving a 12-year prison sentence.
His lawyer, Adam Unikowsky, argued that geofence warrants violate the Fourth Amendment by authorizing a search of every single person's account to find who was within a geofence perimeter.
Justice Elena Kagan, who was joined by the two other liberals on the court and three conservatives, wrote the majority opinion.
"An individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy in records about his cellphone's location, and police intrude on that constitutionally protected interest when they demand the information -- even though for only a limited time, and from a third-party tech company," Kagan wrote.
Eden Heilman, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia, welcomed the ruling.
"The Court's decision confirms that law enforcement does not have a blank check to use new technology to conduct warrantless surveillance of people's movements," Heilman said. "We do not lose our right to privacy simply because we use a cellphone."
Defending the use of geofence warrants, the government argued that a smartphone user can always choose to turn off location services.
Geofence warrants were notably used to identify supporters of President Donald Trump who stormed the US Capitol on January 6, 2021 in a bid to block congressional certification of Democrat Joe Biden's presidential election victory.
Google no longer stores location history data on its servers and has deleted all such data. Other technology companies continue to collect location data, however.
P.Staeheli--VB