-
Pierce Brosnan and Helen Mirren on the joys of filming 'MobLand'
-
'Now or Never': Ethiopia influencers push for Eritrea invasion
-
S.African activists push back on data centre rush
-
Mbappe furore rages on in China, but Mao comments censored
-
Judges set to rule on Australian mushroom killer's appeal
-
Billionaire Ambani's Jio jumps 21% in market debut after record India IPO
-
Syria reopens Jordan border crossing after mending ties
-
Rays win thriller to thwart Brewers in World Series
-
Cyclone Arnab lashes India coast, no deaths reported
-
Reigning champ Knicks earn first win against Pistons
-
Trump tamed after US midterms? Europe doubts it
-
Runners swap streets for shopping malls as haze chokes Singapore
-
Tech stocks soar as SK hynix adds to rising AI confidence
-
Billionaire Ambani's Jio to debut after record India IPO
-
Sri Lanka's Tamil farmers fight to reclaim land after civil war
-
UK set for cautious budget as borrowing costs climb
-
Afghans compete for jobs, homes as millions return
-
Anthropic's record IPO faces some big questions
-
'They don't care about us': Trump food aid cuts leave Americans struggling and angry
-
US Fed expected to hold rates steady ahead of key midterm elections
-
Meta, Snap head to trial in another case about social media's harms
-
Can this Latin Grammy-winner help Democrats win back Congress?
-
French Senate passes bill to make protesters pay for unrest damage
-
Tuvalu has 'limited' power to halt its fossil fuel investments: NZ govt papers seen by AFP
-
India evacuates tens of thousands as Cyclone Arnab makes landfall
-
Palestinian activist Khalil returns to Columbia after US detention
-
In tight Israel vote, both camps hold out cautious hope
-
Trump drastically loosens oil and gas methane rules
-
AI chip giant SK hynix says quarterly operating profit soars 630%
-
French Senate weighs bill to make protesters pay for unrest damage
-
Youths testify about 'despair' in unprecedented Canadian climate trial
-
'A very sad day': Arteta despair as Arsenal stunned by Fleetwood
-
Syria, Jordan agree to mend ties after deadly strike
-
Charles tackles thorny legacy of slavery on Caribbean trip
-
Arsenal stunned by fourth-tier Fleetwood in League Cup
-
Former Grand Slam winner Wawrinka ends tennis career
-
Last-gasp Sabitzer strike sends Dortmund past Bremen in German Cup
-
Brazil's Flavio Bolsonaro flees to US after election loss
-
Rights groups reject Emirati diplomat for UN top job
-
'Faerie' nights: 'ACOTAR' fans finally get their book
-
Flavio Bolsonaro headed to US after Brazil election defeat: US media
-
American woman convicted of getting military training from Islamic State
-
Alcaraz and Zverev win Vienna openers
-
Israel opposition holds narrow edge over Netanyahu in first projections
-
Tech firms gain ahead of Fed decision, results from AI giants
-
Floriani hits maiden goal as Lazio go top
-
Syria condemns deadly Jordan strikes as 'unacceptable violation'
-
Trump set to drastically loosen oil and gas sector's methane rules
-
England's Fin Smith in race against time to face Australia
-
Storied Paris department store seeks bankruptcy protection
US Supreme Court rules on dragnet searches of cellphone location data
The US Supreme Court on Monday ruled partially in favor of a man challenging the use of sweeping "geofence" searches of cellphone location data in his robbery conviction, sending the case back to a lower court for further consideration.
The court, in a 6-3 ruling, said that such searches -- which scan for every phone in a certain place at a specific time -- implicate the US Constitution's Fourth Amendment protections against "unreasonable searches and seizures."
However it said that a lower court would have to determine if the use of the search in the case at hand was in fact reasonable.
The case was brought by Okello Chatrie, identified as a suspect in a 2019 Virginia bank robbery after investigators obtained a warrant to search cellphone location data stored by Google.
Chatrie, who was armed with a gun and made off with $195,000, was eventually convicted and is serving a 12-year prison sentence.
His lawyer, Adam Unikowsky, argued that geofence warrants violate the Fourth Amendment by authorizing a search of every single person's account to find who was within a geofence perimeter.
Justice Elena Kagan, who was joined by the two other liberals on the court and three conservatives, wrote the majority opinion.
"An individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy in records about his cellphone's location, and police intrude on that constitutionally protected interest when they demand the information -- even though for only a limited time, and from a third-party tech company," Kagan wrote.
Eden Heilman, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia, welcomed the ruling.
"The Court's decision confirms that law enforcement does not have a blank check to use new technology to conduct warrantless surveillance of people's movements," Heilman said. "We do not lose our right to privacy simply because we use a cellphone."
Defending the use of geofence warrants, the government argued that a smartphone user can always choose to turn off location services.
Geofence warrants were notably used to identify supporters of President Donald Trump who stormed the US Capitol on January 6, 2021 in a bid to block congressional certification of Democrat Joe Biden's presidential election victory.
Google no longer stores location history data on its servers and has deleted all such data. Other technology companies continue to collect location data, however.
P.Staeheli--VB