-
Harry Kane: England's World Cup saviour
-
Streamex is making digital gold accessible
-
US actor Danny Glover says he has Alzheimer's
-
Mixed US auto sales in Q2 amid high gas prices
-
Trump sees progress as US, Iran hold Qatar talks
-
Pistons forward Harris reportedly headed to Spurs
-
Djokovic, Sinner into Wimbledon third round, Andreeva stunned
-
Jovial Djokovic dismantles Tsitsipas to reach Wimbledon third round
-
Spurs agree club record £100 mn move for Newcastle's Tonali - reports
-
US stocks retreat to open Q3 ahead of June jobs data
-
Rain has final say in 1st England-India T20 as Sooryavanshi still awaits debut
-
'Gus' the T. rex presented in New York ahead of auction
-
England refused to accept defeat in 'beautiful' DR Congo win, says Tuchel
-
Kane saves England after DR Congo scare; US eye last 16
-
'Let the dogs in': Sabalenka wants Wimbledon to lift ban
-
Catholic society defies Vatican by consecrating new bishops
-
Oppressive heat broils US during World Cup, July Fourth
-
New York prepares for Taylor Swift-Travis Kelce wedding
-
Can anyone stop France at the World Cup?
-
Pair climb to top of Empire State Building for apparent proposal
-
Sinner, Sabalenka into Wimbledon third round, Andreeva stunned
-
French Open champ Andreeva stunned by Krejcikova at Wimbledon
-
England have 'hero moments', says Kane after double downs DR Congo
-
Kane rescues England after DR Congo scare; US eye last 16
-
努莎·奧貝爾:為市民實施時速10公里限速,波茨坦的「坑洞政策」——是漠不關心還是無能為力?
-
Kane rescues England from DR Congo calamity to reach World Cup last 16
-
US refuses to extend North America trade pact in current form
-
'Iran, Iran!' Iranian World Cup squad serenaded on return home
-
Mixed US auto sales in 2nd quarter amid high gas prices
-
Pereira 'taken by complete surprise' as Forest let boss go
-
Swiatek, Zverev hoping to lay down Wimbledon markers
-
Нуша Аубель: «Скорость 10» для жителей: политика Потсдама в отношении выбоин — безразличие или некомпетентность?
-
Spray-painted letters spell tragedy for Venezuela quake victims
-
Rufus the hawk patrolling Wimbledon tennis club
-
'Everybody's profiting': Trump defends $1bn crypto earnings
-
Record heat broils US east coast amid World Cup, July Fourth events
-
WTA Finals moved from Riyadh to Indian Wells
-
Bayern sign Morocco midfielder Saibari on five-year deal
-
Messi returns 'home' to lead Argentina World Cup charge in Miami
-
Hope fades, hunger sets in a week after Venezuela quakes
-
England skipper Sciver-Brunt 'threw everything' at World Cup semi-final return
-
Noosha Aubel: 10 km/h for residents – Potsdam’s approach to potholes: indifference or incompetence?
-
Stocks mixed with eyes on US Fed
-
Bayern to host Stuttgart in Bundesliga season opener
-
Trial begins for suspected mastermind of Malta journalist killing
-
US Fed chair says committed to combatting 'too high' prices
-
Traditionalist Catholic society defies Vatican by consecrating new bishops
-
Portugal braces for high temperatures in new heatwave
-
World number ones Sinner, Sabalenka into Wimbledon third round
-
Trump upbeat as US, Iran hold indirect talks in Qatar
Over 14 million people could die from US foreign aid cuts: study
More than 14 million of the world's most vulnerable people, a third of them small children, could die because of the Trump administration's dismantling of US foreign aid, research projected on Tuesday.
The study in the prestigious Lancet journal was published as world and business leaders gather for a UN conference in Spain this week hoping to bolster the reeling aid sector.
The US Agency for International Development (USAID) had provided over 40 percent of global humanitarian funding until Donald Trump returned to the White House in January.
Two weeks later, Trump's then-close advisor -- and world's richest man -- Elon Musk boasted of having put the agency "through the woodchipper".
The funding cuts "risk abruptly halting -- and even reversing -- two decades of progress in health among vulnerable populations," warned study co-author Davide Rasella, a researcher at the Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal).
"For many low- and middle-income countries, the resulting shock would be comparable in scale to a global pandemic or a major armed conflict," he said in a statement.
Looking back over data from 133 nations, the international team of researchers estimated that USAID funding had prevented 91 million deaths in developing countries between 2001 and 2021.
They also used modelling to project how funding being slashed by 83 percent -- the figure announced by the US government earlier this year -- could affect death rates.
The cuts could lead to more than 14 million avoidable deaths by 2030, the projections found. That number included over 4.5 million children under the age of five -- or around 700,000 child deaths a year.
For comparison, around 10 million soldiers are estimated to have been killed during World War I.
Programmes supported by USAID were linked to a 15-percent decrease in deaths from all causes, the researchers found. For children under five, the drop in deaths was twice as steep at 32 percent.
USAID funding was found to be particularly effective at staving off preventable deaths from disease.
There were 65 percent fewer deaths from HIV/AIDS in countries receiving a high level of support compared to those with little or no USAID funding, the study found. Deaths from malaria and neglected tropical diseases were similarly cut in half.
- 'Time to scale up' -
After USAID was gutted, several other major donors including Germany, the UK and France followed suit in announcing plans to slash their foreign aid budgets.
These aid reductions, particularly in the European Union, could lead to "even more additional deaths in the coming years," study co-author Caterina Monti of ISGlobal said.
But the grim projections for deaths were based on the current amount of pledged aid, so could rapidly come down if the situation changes, the researchers emphasised.
Dozens of world leaders are meeting in the Spanish city of Seville this week for the biggest aid conference in a decade. The US, however, will not attend.
"Now is the time to scale up, not scale back," Rasella said.
Before its funding was slashed, USAID represented 0.3 percent of all US federal spending.
"I think most people would support continued USAID funding if they knew just how effective such a small contribution can be to saving millions of lives."
S.Gantenbein--VB