-
Russia strikes Ukraine capital with missiles and drones, wounds five
-
Kane saves England after DR Congo scare; Belgium comeback stuns Senegal
-
Belgium late show floors Senegal at World Cup
-
Celtics to trade Jaylen Brown to 76ers for Paul George: report
-
Harry Kane: England's World Cup saviour
-
Streamex is making digital gold accessible
-
US actor Danny Glover says he has Alzheimer's
-
Mixed US auto sales in Q2 amid high gas prices
-
Trump sees progress as US, Iran hold Qatar talks
-
Pistons forward Harris reportedly headed to Spurs
-
Djokovic, Sinner into Wimbledon third round, Andreeva stunned
-
Jovial Djokovic dismantles Tsitsipas to reach Wimbledon third round
-
Spurs agree club record £100 mn move for Newcastle's Tonali - reports
-
US stocks retreat to open Q3 ahead of June jobs data
-
Rain has final say in 1st England-India T20 as Sooryavanshi still awaits debut
-
'Gus' the T. rex presented in New York ahead of auction
-
England refused to accept defeat in 'beautiful' DR Congo win, says Tuchel
-
Kane saves England after DR Congo scare; US eye last 16
-
'Let the dogs in': Sabalenka wants Wimbledon to lift ban
-
Catholic society defies Vatican by consecrating new bishops
-
Oppressive heat broils US during World Cup, July Fourth
-
New York prepares for Taylor Swift-Travis Kelce wedding
-
Can anyone stop France at the World Cup?
-
Pair climb to top of Empire State Building for apparent proposal
-
Sinner, Sabalenka into Wimbledon third round, Andreeva stunned
-
French Open champ Andreeva stunned by Krejcikova at Wimbledon
-
England have 'hero moments', says Kane after double downs DR Congo
-
Kane rescues England after DR Congo scare; US eye last 16
-
努莎·奧貝爾:為市民實施時速10公里限速,波茨坦的「坑洞政策」——是漠不關心還是無能為力?
-
Kane rescues England from DR Congo calamity to reach World Cup last 16
-
US refuses to extend North America trade pact in current form
-
'Iran, Iran!' Iranian World Cup squad serenaded on return home
-
Mixed US auto sales in 2nd quarter amid high gas prices
-
Pereira 'taken by complete surprise' as Forest let boss go
-
Swiatek, Zverev hoping to lay down Wimbledon markers
-
Нуша Аубель: «Скорость 10» для жителей: политика Потсдама в отношении выбоин — безразличие или некомпетентность?
-
Spray-painted letters spell tragedy for Venezuela quake victims
-
Rufus the hawk patrolling Wimbledon tennis club
-
'Everybody's profiting': Trump defends $1bn crypto earnings
-
Record heat broils US east coast amid World Cup, July Fourth events
-
WTA Finals moved from Riyadh to Indian Wells
-
Bayern sign Morocco midfielder Saibari on five-year deal
-
Messi returns 'home' to lead Argentina World Cup charge in Miami
-
Hope fades, hunger sets in a week after Venezuela quakes
-
England skipper Sciver-Brunt 'threw everything' at World Cup semi-final return
-
Noosha Aubel: 10 km/h for residents – Potsdam’s approach to potholes: indifference or incompetence?
-
Stocks mixed with eyes on US Fed
-
Bayern to host Stuttgart in Bundesliga season opener
-
Trial begins for suspected mastermind of Malta journalist killing
-
US Fed chair says committed to combatting 'too high' prices
NGO loses bid to block UK export of military equipment to Israel
The High Court in London rejected a legal challenge on Monday brought by a Palestinian rights group seeking to block the UK from supplying components for Israeli F-35 fighter jets.
Israel has used the jets to devastating effect in its bombardment of Gaza.
Both sides have been accused of atrocities during a conflict that has killed tens of thousands -- the vast majority of them Palestinian civilians, according to figures the United Nations deems reliable.
The UK government suspended some export licences for military equipment after concluding there was a risk Israel could be breaching international humanitarian law but made an exemption for some parts for Lockheed Martin F-35 stealth jets.
In its claim to the High Court, rights group Al-Haq called for a judicial review, saying the "carve out" was unlawful and alleging the government had misunderstood the applicable rules of international law.
It was supported by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Oxfam and others in its case.
Judges Stephen Males and Karen Steyn said they "reject all" of the grounds for challenging the government's decision.
The case was not about "whether the UK should supply arms or other military equipment to Israel", said the judges.
Rather, the case was concerned with "whether it is open to the court to rule that the UK must withdraw from a specific multilateral defence collaboration" because of the prospect that some UK manufactured components may be used by Israel in the Gaza war in actions that could break international humanitarian law.
"Under our constitution that acutely sensitive and political issue is a matter for the executive, which is democratically accountable to parliament, and ultimately to the electorate, not for the courts," said the judges.
"Once the true nature of the issue is identified, it is clear that the claim must fail. Accordingly, permission to bring a judicial review claim is refused," they added.
Shawan Jabarin, General Director of Al-Haq said in a statement issued to AFP: "By exposing serious government failings in facilitating international crimes against Palestinians through its arms exports, civil society and human rights organisations have achieved a crucial breakthrough.
"We will continue to persevere in the UK and beyond until governments are held accountable. Israel's impunity is challenged and justice for the Palestinian people is realised," he added.
- 'Loophole' -
The UK contributes components to an international defence programme that produces and maintains the F-35s.
Defence Secretary John Healey argued a suspension would impact the "whole F-35 programme" and have a "profound impact on international peace and security".
Lawyers for Al-Haq said the government had known there was a "clear risk" Israel would use the jet parts to commit violations of international law.
But government lawyer James Eadie said the court was not placed to rule on the legality of Israel's actions, and that attempting to do so could have a "potentially deleterious" effect on "foreign relations with a friendly state, namely Israel".
In September 2024, the new Labour government announced it was suspending around 30 of 350 export licences following a review of Israel's compliance with international humanitarian law.
But the partial ban did not cover British-made F-35 parts, which include refuelling probes, laser targeting systems, tyres and ejector seats, according to Oxfam.
Healey has previously said suspending F-35 licences would "undermine US confidence in the UK and NATO" but lawyers for Al-Haq have described the exemption as a "loophole".
UK-based NGO Campaign Against Arms Trade has said that licencing figures showed the government had made a "shocking increase in military exports to Israel" in the months after its September 2024 announcement of partial suspensions.
It said the figures showed the UK approved £127.6 million ($170 million) in military equipment to Israel in single-issue licences from October to December 2024, saying this was more than for the period from 2020 to 2023 combined.
Most of the licences were for military radars, components and software, as well as targeting equipment, according to the NGO, which was involved in the case against the government.
Israel launched war on Gaza after an attack by militants from Palestinian group Hamas on October 7, 2023, which resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on Israeli official figures.
Israel's retaliatory campaign has killed at least 56,500 people in Gaza, an occupied Palestinian territory, most of them civilians, according to the territory's health ministry.
The UN considers these figures to be reliable.
L.Stucki--VB