-
From Maradona to Messi: Bangladesh's enduring love for Argentina
-
Founding father: statues of Myanmar's Aung San disappear
-
UN to list more sites as 'in danger' from conflict or climate change
-
Infantino's enlarged World Cup gamble pays off with punters
-
Egypt's 'Garbage City' recyclers reap gains from Iran war plastic squeeze
-
No fuel, no patience: Russians endure fuel shortages
-
Spain, Argentina prepare for World Cup final, Trump hails success
-
'Chainsaw massacre': Europe mulls culls for fish-guzzling cormorant
-
Supplies run dry in Venezuelan village on edge of quake zone
-
England carry 'scars' of World Cup exit, says Tuchel
-
Latin America's unlikely football unity: cheering against Argentina
-
Argentina coach Scaloni hails 'legend' Messi before World Cup final
-
Aston Villa sign Swiss World Cup star Manzambi
-
Argentina World Cup success moves me to tears, says goalkeeper Martinez
-
Trump questions England's World Cup tactics
-
Messi to get 'special attention' from Spain, says de la Fuente
-
Spain captain Rodri preparing for 'physical' Argentina battle
-
Italy coach Quesada's ban reduced to one Test
-
Leather jacket worn by Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang auctions for nearly $1 mn
-
Sobers 'stood out' among the greats: West Indies legend Holding
-
Leader Herbert, Burns equal record 62 at British Open, DeChambeau docked two shots
-
DeChambeau's British Open charge hit by two-shot penalty
-
Yankees' Judge improving, but not ready for baseball activities
-
Tech share selloff rolls on, oil prices jump on Mideast clashes
-
None shall pass: Spain's defence ready to thwart Messi in World Cup final
-
Messi eyes second World Cup crown at the scene of his lowest ebb
-
China's Kimi K3 rattles US AI industry
-
Herbert hopes British Open 62 woke Australian kids in the night
-
Herbert takes Open lead, equals Burns' round of 62
-
Norris misses winning, resents intrusions in private life
-
'Great innings ends': Cricket mourns West Indies great Sobers
-
Thousands protest sacking of Ukraine defence minister: AFP
-
Fickle winds whip up huge Spanish wildfire
-
Ex-president Sall back in Senegal for talks with successor
-
US links Taco Bell lettuce to diarrhea-causing parasite outbreak
-
Argentina's Colapinto more nervous about World Cup final than F1 race
-
Strong quake hits southern Mexico, tsunami alert lifted
-
British Museum shows Bayeux Tapestry unfurled after 'titanic' efforts
-
Deschamps set for bittersweet ending to France reign as Zidane waits
-
Ferrari fined but Hamilton and Leclerc escape grid penalty
-
German lawmaker faces criticism for US surrogacy to have a child
-
Tackling Messi 'huge challenge' for Spain: Merino
-
Southern Mexico hit by 7.3 quake, triggering tsunami alert
-
What's behind the Argentina World Cup team's can-do attitude?
-
Germany defender Gosens signs with Schalke
-
Pogacar urges rivals to fight for victory
-
Nigerian court dismisses suit challenging Shell's divestment
-
'Great innings has come to an end' -- cricket legend Sobers dies
-
Ex-president Sall arrives back in Senegal for meeting with successor
-
No tears as Deschamps prepares for final France match
Supreme Court agrees to hear Trump presidential immunity claim
The US Supreme Court agreed on Wednesday to hear Donald Trump's claim that as a former president he enjoys immunity from criminal prosecution, as the 2024 White House candidate faces dozens of state and federal charges.
The court scheduled arguments in the high-stakes case for the week of April 22 and said Trump's trial on charges of conspiring to overturn the 2020 election would remain on hold for now.
Trump had been scheduled to go on trial for election interference on March 4 but the proceedings have been frozen as his presidential immunity claim wound its way through the courts.
The Supreme Court said it would address the question of "whether and if so to what extent does a former President enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office."
It will be among the most consequential election law cases to reach the court since it halted the Florida vote recount in 2000 with Republican George W. Bush narrowly leading Democrat Al Gore.
A three-judge appeals court panel ruled earlier this month that the 77-year-old Trump has no immunity from prosecution as a former president.
Trump's claim to be immune from criminal liability for actions he took while in the White House is "unsupported by precedent, history or the text and structure of the Constitution," the judges said in a unanimous opinion.
"We cannot accept that the office of the Presidency places its former occupants above the law for all time thereafter," they said.
The ruling was a major legal setback for Trump, the frontrunner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination and the first ex-president to be criminally indicted.
The appeals court put the immunity ruling on hold to give Trump the opportunity to appeal to the Supreme Court.
Special Counsel Jack Smith filed the election conspiracy case against Trump in August and had been pushing hard for the March start date for his trial.
Lawyers for the former president have sought repeatedly to delay the trial until after the November election, when Trump could potentially have all of the federal cases against him dropped if he wins the White House again.
- Colorado case -
Trump also faces 2020 election interference charges in Georgia, and has been indicted in Florida for allegedly mishandling classified information.
He was impeached twice by the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives while in office -- once for inciting an insurrection -- but acquitted both times by the Senate.
The immunity case is one of two election-related cases before the Supreme Court.
The Colorado Supreme Court barred Trump in December from appearing on the Republican presidential primary ballot in the state because of his role in the January 6, 2021 attack on the US Capitol by his supporters.
Trump appealed the Colorado ruling and the conservative-majority Supreme Court heard arguments in the case in early February.
Both conservative and liberal justices expressed concern during arguments about having individual states decide which candidates can be on the presidential ballot this November.
W.Huber--VB