-
UK set for cautious budget as borrowing costs climb
-
Afghans compete for jobs, homes as millions return
-
Anthropic's record IPO faces some big questions
-
'They don't care about us': Trump food aid cuts leave Americans struggling and angry
-
US Fed expected to hold rates steady ahead of key midterm elections
-
Meta, Snap head to trial in another case about social media's harms
-
Can this Latin Grammy-winner help Democrats win back Congress?
-
French Senate passes bill to make protesters pay for unrest damage
-
Tuvalu has 'limited' power to halt its fossil fuel investments: NZ govt papers seen by AFP
-
India evacuates tens of thousands as Cyclone Arnab makes landfall
-
Palestinian activist Khalil returns to Columbia after US detention
-
In tight Israel vote, both camps hold out cautious hope
-
Trump drastically loosens oil and gas methane rules
-
AI chip giant SK hynix says quarterly operating profit soars 630%
-
French Senate weighs bill to make protesters pay for unrest damage
-
Youths testify about 'despair' in unprecedented Canadian climate trial
-
'A very sad day': Arteta despair as Arsenal stunned by Fleetwood
-
Syria, Jordan agree to mend ties after deadly strike
-
Charles tackles thorny legacy of slavery on Caribbean trip
-
Arsenal stunned by fourth-tier Fleetwood in League Cup
-
Former Grand Slam winner Wawrinka ends tennis career
-
Last-gasp Sabitzer strike sends Dortmund past Bremen in German Cup
-
Brazil's Flavio Bolsonaro flees to US after election loss
-
Rights groups reject Emirati diplomat for UN top job
-
'Faerie' nights: 'ACOTAR' fans finally get their book
-
Flavio Bolsonaro headed to US after Brazil election defeat: US media
-
American woman convicted of getting military training from Islamic State
-
Alcaraz and Zverev win Vienna openers
-
Israel opposition holds narrow edge over Netanyahu in first projections
-
Tech firms gain ahead of Fed decision, results from AI giants
-
Floriani hits maiden goal as Lazio go top
-
Syria condemns deadly Jordan strikes as 'unacceptable violation'
-
Trump set to drastically loosen oil and gas sector's methane rules
-
England's Fin Smith in race against time to face Australia
-
Storied Paris department store seeks bankruptcy protection
-
UN nuclear watchdog chief urges Iran to grant access
-
Xhaka, Embolo can return to Swiss squad after fake Covid docs affair
-
Boeing shares tumble after it releases cautious growth forecast
-
Allegri suspended for two Serie A games after red card
-
Lula's re-election revives Brazil-US tensions
-
Flight data, satellite images reveal growing US role at Ecuador base
-
Carney moves to remake Canada alliances as US ties strained
-
McInnes feels 'guilt' ahead of Hearts return with Rangers
-
Serbia's students demand state media chiefs resign after poll win
-
Brazil's Lula turns 81, vows to work '24 hours a day'
-
Starc takes six as Australia fight back in South Africa decider
-
Boeing releases cautious growth plan as shares fall sharply
-
UK man offered drugged wife to strangers online for sex: court
-
Exiled Russian dissident Navalnaya warns dictators becoming 'more cunning'
-
Africa Ebola outbreak passes 10,000 cases, mostly in DR Congo
Pentagon studying Putin nuclear order
US officials on Monday called Russian President Vladimir Putin's order to mobilize his nuclear forces "dangerous" but said they had not seen any indication of any change in the country's strategic threat.
Officials also said that Russian troops in Ukraine continue to move ahead slowly, hampered by fuel supply issues, and downplayed reports that the Belarus army intended to enter Ukraine as reinforcements for Moscow's invasion force.
On Sunday, four days after Moscow launched the invasion, Putin announced that he had ordered his military chiefs "to put the deterrence forces of the Russian army into a special mode of combat service."
Officials at the US State and Defense Departments said they were still trying to determine just what action was being taken in response to the order.
"We think provocative rhetoric regarding nuclear weapons is dangerous, adds to the risk of miscalculation, should be avoided, and we will not indulge in it," a State Department spokesperson said.
"Russia and the United States have long agreed that nuclear use would have devastating consequences, and have stated many times, including earlier this year, that a nuclear war cannot be won, and must never be fought," the spokesperson said.
A senior Pentagon official said there had been no palpable change in the stance of Russia's powerful nuclear arsenal, but called Putin's order "unnecessary and very escalatory."
"I don't believe we've seen anything specific as a result of the direction that he gave," the official told reporters.
The US officials said Russia was facing no military threat from the West, even as the United States and NATO allies were supplying arms to Ukraine to counter the Russian invasion.
The Pentagon official said the language Putin used in his order was not consistent with what would be expected in mobilizing nuclear forces.
"It's not a doctrinal term, and the way he characterized it, a 'special combat duty alert' ... it's not a term of art in what we understand to be Russian doctrine," the official said.
- Resistance 'pretty effective'-
The Pentagon official said that the Russian invasion force continued to wrestle with logistical problems that had left them short of their apparent goals Monday.
The main Russian targets remain to capture Kharkiv, the site of the heaviest fighting, and Kyiv, the capital.
And while satellite photos from Maxar show a massive Russian military column north of Kyiv, they remain 25 kilometers away, advancing just five kilometers in the past day, according to the official.
"They're running out of gas, and they're having logistics problems," the official said.
"The Ukrainians have proved pretty effective" in their resistance, the official added.
Meanwhile the official said the Pentagon had not seen Belarus troops take part in Russia's invasion of Ukraine, despite concerns that they will.
Belarus, which borders Ukraine and is a close ally of Russia, did allow its territory to be used as a staging ground for the invasion.
"We have seen no indications that Belarusian troops are being readied to move into Ukraine, and certainly no indications that they are in fact, moving or are in Ukraine," the official said.
The official also said there was no evidence Russia would place nuclear weapons in Belarus, as a way of challenging NATO's support for Ukraine.
I.Meyer--BTB