-
'I want to be Eala': Philippine sensation sparks tennis boom at home
-
Australia probes three near-misses at Sydney Airport
-
US says lower oil prices, not Iran's nuclear program, are now top priority in war
-
Classy Tanzid puts Bangladesh in firm charge against Australia
-
Most Asian stocks track Wall St record as US data ease rate fears
-
Schwarber smacks two homers to power Philles' MLB Field of Dreams win
-
China's viral 'spicy strips' take a bite of global snack market
-
Pakistan's date workers toil through rising heat
-
Shelton does the double in Canada
-
New trend of injecting banned peptides to 'optimise' body
-
'Shock' gloves for US immigration agents fuel potential abuse fears
-
Eddie Jones senses Japan's time has come against Australia
-
New Zealand Football withdraws support for Infantino, urges review
-
UK vote count under way in Farage, Binface showdown
-
Hopes fade in Colombia as window to find quake survivors shuts
-
US, Mexico conduct security exercises near border
-
Trump announces tariffs of up to 100% on imported drones
-
Swiatek rolls past Rybakina for WTA Toronto title
-
Spieth among five sharing Memphis lead as PGA playoffs open
-
Vance says low oil prices are top US goal in Iran conflict
-
Boats rescue tourists as forest fire flames threaten Greek beaches
-
Hunt bags Euro sprint double, Ceh keeps discus title
-
Good vibes powering Djokovic return to Cincinnati
-
'Dream come true': Owners reunite with pets in quake-hit Colombia
-
Britain's Hunt wins 200m for European sprint double
-
US stocks gain after benign inflation data, oil prices retreat
-
Draper dumped as Norrie saves face for Britain in Cincinnati
-
LeBron's Sixers in spotlight as full 2026-27 NBA schedule revealed
-
England opener Gay out for duck in Pakistan warm-up
-
Kennedy Center board votes to restore Trump name: reports
-
Europe swelters under fresh wave of extreme heat
-
Barcelona agree to sell Torres to PSG: media
-
French Olympic gold medallist Florent Manaudou announces retirement
-
Romania shuts nuclear plant as Danube drops
-
Tourists rescued by boat as forest fire threatens Greek beaches
-
Millions of Europeans struggle with another wave of extreme heat
-
Indicted Raul Castro reappears after months out of public view
-
Israel reopens once-closed West Bank settlement
-
Italian teen Curtis breaks women's 50m backstroke world record for second time
-
Taylor to captain New Zealand for first time against Bulls
-
Taulagi steps out of 'comfort zone' with code switch to French Top 14 new boys
-
Carrick urges Man Utd to push for more signings to boost title bid
-
Leicester's Thai owners put troubled club up for sale: reports
-
'This was my World Cup' says Somali ref after UEFA Super Cup
-
Stocks steady as US inflation worries ease, oil slips
-
Survivors tell of horror of Zimbabwe ferry sinking as death toll hits 46
-
Porsche to end production of flagship electric car: report
-
Juventus forward Vlahovic signs three-year Besiktas deal
-
Twitch sparks gamers' wrath with Amazon AI sharing deal
-
Tielemans apologises for offending Villa fans with Man Utd boast
Pentagon studying Putin nuclear order
US officials on Monday called Russian President Vladimir Putin's order to mobilize his nuclear forces "dangerous" but said they had not seen any indication of any change in the country's strategic threat.
Officials also said that Russian troops in Ukraine continue to move ahead slowly, hampered by fuel supply issues, and downplayed reports that the Belarus army intended to enter Ukraine as reinforcements for Moscow's invasion force.
On Sunday, four days after Moscow launched the invasion, Putin announced that he had ordered his military chiefs "to put the deterrence forces of the Russian army into a special mode of combat service."
Officials at the US State and Defense Departments said they were still trying to determine just what action was being taken in response to the order.
"We think provocative rhetoric regarding nuclear weapons is dangerous, adds to the risk of miscalculation, should be avoided, and we will not indulge in it," a State Department spokesperson said.
"Russia and the United States have long agreed that nuclear use would have devastating consequences, and have stated many times, including earlier this year, that a nuclear war cannot be won, and must never be fought," the spokesperson said.
A senior Pentagon official said there had been no palpable change in the stance of Russia's powerful nuclear arsenal, but called Putin's order "unnecessary and very escalatory."
"I don't believe we've seen anything specific as a result of the direction that he gave," the official told reporters.
The US officials said Russia was facing no military threat from the West, even as the United States and NATO allies were supplying arms to Ukraine to counter the Russian invasion.
The Pentagon official said the language Putin used in his order was not consistent with what would be expected in mobilizing nuclear forces.
"It's not a doctrinal term, and the way he characterized it, a 'special combat duty alert' ... it's not a term of art in what we understand to be Russian doctrine," the official said.
- Resistance 'pretty effective'-
The Pentagon official said that the Russian invasion force continued to wrestle with logistical problems that had left them short of their apparent goals Monday.
The main Russian targets remain to capture Kharkiv, the site of the heaviest fighting, and Kyiv, the capital.
And while satellite photos from Maxar show a massive Russian military column north of Kyiv, they remain 25 kilometers away, advancing just five kilometers in the past day, according to the official.
"They're running out of gas, and they're having logistics problems," the official said.
"The Ukrainians have proved pretty effective" in their resistance, the official added.
Meanwhile the official said the Pentagon had not seen Belarus troops take part in Russia's invasion of Ukraine, despite concerns that they will.
Belarus, which borders Ukraine and is a close ally of Russia, did allow its territory to be used as a staging ground for the invasion.
"We have seen no indications that Belarusian troops are being readied to move into Ukraine, and certainly no indications that they are in fact, moving or are in Ukraine," the official said.
The official also said there was no evidence Russia would place nuclear weapons in Belarus, as a way of challenging NATO's support for Ukraine.
I.Meyer--BTB