-
Most equities rise after oil price plunge, US data in focus
-
Tom Kim defies jet-lag, Kho cards ace as Asian Games golf begins
-
Polar oceans transformed as warming melts ice habitats: research
-
Thai teen rocker Nene aims to tour, write music... and return to school
-
Lost shark becomes viral star in South Korea
-
Ivory Coast clamps down on harmful illegal gold rush
-
Dangote to launch $16bn refinery in Kenya
-
Nagoya mayor says sorry for Asian Games 'inconveniences'
-
North Korean leader 'extremely obese': Seoul spy agency
-
G20 trade officials meet under shadow of tariffs, overcapacity
-
Yankees and pope-backed White Sox start MLB playoffs with wins
-
India's fat dog vote goes viral
-
Malaysia's ex-PM Mahathir in hospital for observation
-
Asian Games crowds in spotlight as 998 see hosts in 50,000 stadium
-
'No limits': Marathon world record holder Sawe chasing history
-
The eight stadiums for the 2027 Rugby World Cup
-
Countdown begins to biggest-ever Rugby World Cup
-
Thieves swipe drugs under nose of Fiji police, swap with flour
-
Bangladesh women lose ground after quota reform
-
South Korea demands North apologise for DMZ mine blasts
-
Vietnam admits 'differing opinions' on Hanoi development
-
In Nepal's flood zone, teachers mourn students who never returned
-
Stocks temper gains as oil pares heavy losses, US data in focus
-
US Supreme Court lifts limits on third-country deportations
-
New Zealand denies breaching climate commitments to EU
-
Antonelli eager to 're-establish order' as F1 returns to Malaysia
-
Albert becomes youngest US scorer in 4-2 win over Chile
-
Paw-fect candidate: Australia finds new koala rescue dog
-
Pirate island's plunging population shows Greece's demographic decline
-
One third of world population exposed to harmful air pollution: monitor
-
With elections ahead, Latvia's Russian-speakers reject Moscow's help
-
North Korea denies South's claim it was apparently behind DMZ mine blasts
-
Brazil football clubs face massive sponsorship blow from betting ban
-
West Bank's violent settlers part of a new generation fuelled by ideology
-
ChatGPT maker wants to be the App Store for AI as safety concerns grow
-
US-led coalition ends mission in Iraq
-
Women fight fires and sexism in Indonesian Borneo
-
Pope-backed White Sox join Braves with MLB playoff wins
-
Forsling's OT blast lifts Florida over Carolina in NHL opener
-
NBA close to picking new $12-13bn Vegas team owners: report
-
Hurricane Polo sweeps over Mexico's Pacific coast, heads inland
-
LA28 Olympics torch relay to visit all 50 states
-
Grynspan pulls ahead in race to lead UN: diplomat
-
Spain brush aside Croatia in Nations League, England down Czechs
-
Trump touts AI boss pledge to self-regulate
-
Trump hails 'morally binding' AI self-regulation pledge
-
Oil down, but stocks lower as bond yields rise
-
Yamal inspires Spain to Croatia romp on World Cup homecoming
-
England break down stubborn Czechs to claim first Nations League win
-
UN to hold fourth informal poll of secretary-general candidates
Trump tariffs stay in place for now, after appellate ruling
US President Donald Trump on Thursday won a temporary reprieve for his aggressive tariff strategy, with an appeals court preserving his sweeping import duties on China and other trading partners -- for now.
The short-term relief will allow for an appeals process to proceed, after the Court of International Trade on Wednesday barred most of the tariffs announced since Trump took office, ruling that he had overstepped his authority.
Since returning to the presidency in January, Trump has moved to reconfigure US trade ties with the world while using levies to force foreign governments to the negotiating table.
But the stop-start tariff rollout, impacting both allies and adversaries, has roiled markets and snarled supply chains.
Prior to Thursday's decision from the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, known as an administrative stay, the White House was given 10 days to halt affected tariffs.
The Trump administration called the ruling "blatantly wrong," filing an appeal and expressing confidence that the decision would be overturned.
White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt told reporters that the judges "brazenly abused their judicial power to usurp the authority of President Trump."
Leavitt said the Supreme Court "must put an end" to the tariff challenge, while stressing that Trump has other legal means to impose levies.
- 'Hiccups' -
Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, told Fox Business that "hiccups" sparked by the decisions of "activist judges" would not affect talks with trading partners, adding that three deals are close to finalization.
Trump's trade advisor Peter Navarro told reporters after the appellate ruling that the administration had received "plenty of phone calls from countries" who said they would continue to "negotiate in good faith," without naming those nations.
Trump's import levies are aimed at punishing economies that sell more to the United States than they buy.
The president has argued that trade deficits and the threat posed by drug smuggling constituted a "national emergency" that justified the widespread tariffs -- which the Court of International Trade ruled against.
Trump unveiled sweeping import duties on nearly all trading partners in April, at a baseline 10 percent -- plus steeper levies on dozens of economies including China and the EU, which have since been paused.
The US trade court's Wednesday ruling quashed these blanket duties, alongside those that Trump imposed on Canada, Mexico and China separately using emergency powers.
But it left intact 25 percent duties on imported autos, steel and aluminum.
Beijing -- which was hit by additional 145 percent tariffs before they were temporarily reduced to make space for negotiations -- reacted to the trade court decision by saying Washington should scrap the levies.
"China urges the United States to heed the rational voices from the international community and domestic stakeholders and fully cancel the wrongful unilateral tariff measures," said commerce ministry spokeswoman He Yongqian.
Asian markets rallied Thursday, US indexes closed higher while Europe closed slightly down.
- 'Extraordinary threat' -
The federal trade court was ruling in two separate cases -- brought by businesses and a coalition of state governments -- arguing that the president had violated Congress's power of the purse.
The judges said the cases rested on whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA) delegates such powers to the president "in the form of authority to impose unlimited tariffs on goods from nearly every country in the world."
The judges stated that any interpretation of the IEEPA that "delegates unlimited tariff authority is unconstitutional."
Analysts at London-based research group Capital Economics said the case may end up with the Supreme Court, but would likely not mark the end of the tariff war.
burs-bys/sst
J.Sauter--VB