-
European heatwave's unlikely accomplice: an ocean 'cold blob'
-
Lyles enjoying freedom to focus on speed and stuff off the track
-
Japan's progress paying off at World Cup, says Troussier
-
How the British royal family is funded, and where the money goes
-
Dozens of international teams rushing to Venezuela: UN
-
Russia-annexed Crimea declares 'emergency' amid Ukraine strikes
-
Floods kill two in Taiwan as twin storms approach Japan
-
Stocks slide on renewed tech slump, oil prices fall
-
In the heat, Ivorians don't think twice about using aircon
-
EU hits France's Sanofi with flu vaccine antitrust probe
-
Belgium cancels Waterloo battle reenactment due to heat
-
Europe heatwave swamps hospitals, halts parties
-
Mayweather-Pacquiao rematch postponed indefinitely
-
MEXC Reports 142% Volume Surge for MU Futures Following Record Micron Earnings Beat
-
Four injured, flights cancelled in Japan as twin storms approach
-
Serena Williams to face Joint in Wimbledon return after four-year absence
-
Russia pulls team from gymnastics World Cup event over flag row
-
UN says Iran nuclear pledge needs 'very strong' verification
-
Venezuelans hunt for survivors after quakes kill at least 235
-
New Zealand internal report warns of Chinese military forays in Pacific
-
Mexico's Sheinbaum and Spanish king use World Cup to mend diplomatic rift
-
Mbappe v Haaland as France face Norway in World Cup group decider
-
'Die together': Ukraine's LGBTQ soldiers fighting Russia -- and for their rights
-
European economies suffer from heatwave
-
Wole Soyinka university theatre: a talent factory for Nigeria and beyond
-
Hospitals overwhelmed as Europe heatwave shifts east
-
Climate change to blame for intensity of Europe heatwave: scientists
-
努莎·奧貝爾與迪特馬爾·沃伊德克 波茨坦如何辜負一名重度殘障幼兒
-
Venezuelan mother digs with bare hands for missing son
-
'Very strong' nuclear verification needed in Iran after war: IAEA head
-
Нуша Аубель и Дитмар Войдке: как Потсдам бросает на произвол судьбы малыша с тяжелой формой инвалидности
-
US lose 3-2 to Turkey after last-gasp strike
-
Turkey beat US 3-2 with last-gasp winner
-
Venezuelans search for survivors after quakes kill at least 235
-
Asian stocks suffer fresh rout as rollercoaster week draws to close
-
French teen in Singapore straw-licking case to enter plea
-
Japan coach hopes World Cup success can inspire Asian rivals
-
Red rocks yield coveted minerals in DR Congo
-
'Unbearable': tracking heat in one of New Delhi's poorest areas
-
Sony discontinues Japan sales of robot puppy 'aibo'
-
Sheinbaum and King Felipe VI use World Cup to mend diplomatic rift
-
Tunisia boss Renard has 'no regrets' despite World Cup flop
-
Viral bullying videos test Bhutan's digital transition
-
Asian stocks drop again as rollercoaster week draws to close
-
Venezuela races to search for survivors after quakes kill at least 235
-
Court battle plays out over Wimbledon tennis expansion plan
-
Attack on ship in Hormuz leads UN to halt evacuation plan for trapped sailors
-
List of worst World Cup performances
-
Yoon leads Women's PGA Championship, Korda satisfied with 'solid' start
-
NZ internal report warns of Chinese military forays in Pacific
ICJ sides with E.Guinea in spat with Gabon over oil-rich islands
The top United Nations court on Monday sided with Equatorial Guinea in a decades-long dispute with Gabon over three tiny islands in potentially oil-rich waters.
The two west African nations have been squabbling over the 30-hectare (74-acre) island of Mbanie and two smaller low-lying islets, Cocotiers and Conga, since the early 1970s.
The islands themselves are tiny and virtually uninhabited but lie in an area potentially rich in oil and gas.
The dispute dates all the way back to 1900, when then colonial powers France and Spain signed a treaty in Paris setting out the borders between the two countries.
But Gabon argued that a later treaty, the 1974 Bata Convention, then fixed the islands' sovereignty in their favour.
However, the International Court of Justice ruled that the Bata Convention "invoked by the Gabonese Republic is not a treaty having the force of law... and does not constitute a legal title."
It said that the legal title to the islands was held by Spain, which then passed to Equatorial Guinea upon independence in 1968.
Unlike most countries appearing before the ICJ in The Hague, which rules in disputes between states, Guinea and Equatorial Guinea agreed to ask judges for a ruling in an effort to find an amical solution.
The two countries asked the court to decide which legal texts are valid -- the Paris Treaty of 1900 or the Bata Convention of 1974.
In hearings in October, Equatorial Guinea argued that Gabon invaded the islands in 1972 and had occupied them illegally ever since.
Lawyers for the country rubbished the Bata Convention in the October hearings, saying Gabon suddenly produced the document in 2003, surprising everyone.
"No one had seen or heard of this supposed convention," Domingo Mba Esono, Vice-Minister of Mines and Hydrocarbons from Equatorial Guinea, told ICJ judges.
"Moreover, the document presented was not an original but was only an unauthenticated photocopy," said Esono.
Philippe Sands, a lawyer representing Equatorial Guinea, dismissed the Bata Convention as "scraps of paper".
"You are being asked to rule that a state can rely on a photocopy of a photocopy of a purported document, the original of which cannot be found and of which no mention was made or any reliance placed for three decades," said Sands.
Equatorial Guinea has been asking for an original copy of the Bata Convention since 2003, so far in vain.
- 'Badly managed' -
But Marie-Madeleine Mborantsuo, honorary president of Gabon's constitutional court, argued that the Bata Convention "resolves all sovereignty issues regarding the islands and border delimitation".
She admitted that "sadly, neither of the two parties can find the original document", noting it was drawn up in an era before computers and databases.
"Archives were badly managed because of a number of things -- unfavourable climate, a lack of trained personnel and lack of technology," said Mborantsuo.
The court ruled that neither country seemed to regard the Bata Convention as binding upon them, meaning the court did not consider it the correct title in force.
M.Vogt--VB