-
Asian stocks drop as oil spike fans rate hike bets, eyes on US jobs
-
Lula, Bolsonaro both snub final debate before Brazil election
-
Viral anti-vax posts weaponise Philippine inoculation fears
-
Nepal's grim DNA puzzle to identify flood dead
-
Saudi coalition accuses Houthis of drone attack on Medina
-
EU nations to hold emergency meeting on soaring diesel prices amid US pressure
-
Effective Altruism: the philosophy behind Silicon Valley's AI fears
-
Anthropic's Dario Amodei: AI's most visible CEO and enigma
-
Chinese judoka accused of biting as home hope wins Asian Games gold
-
OpenAI says three staffers fired for mishandling 'sensitive' info
-
Four-member crew docks at International Space Station
-
Nike plans job cuts as it forecasts lower sales
-
Portugal win without Ronaldo as Klopp's Germany get first victory
-
Ireland game interrupted twice by Gaza protests
-
Wemby: 'Very sad' to see players endorse betting firms
-
Judge denies acquittal bid by US woman who killed her kids
-
Manchester City Women scrape draw with Real Madrid
-
Klopp averts crisis with first win as Germany boss
-
India, Australia and Pakistan in same World Cup group
-
A saintly spat and debate snub: Brazil enters final campaign stretch
-
Daryz's hopes of repeat Arc win boosted by draw
-
US tells European allies to act 'immediately' to lower diesel prices
-
Steelers ship disgruntled defender Porter to Cowboys
-
G20 trade ministers fail to see consensus against overproduction
-
Klopp gets first win as Germany boss
-
Portugal edge Denmark in Ronaldo's absence
-
Bolivia's attorney general arrested on drugs, money laundering charges
-
US stocks edge higher as bond yields retreat for now
-
Raiders host Chiefs in battle of unbeaten division rivals
-
US tells European allies to 'immediately' act to lower diesel prices
-
Lowest Fee Bitcoin ATMs Announces Launch of More Than 400 ATMs Nationwide
-
Trump vows to hit Iran 'very hard' if linked to flydubai attack
-
G20 against 'weaponization' of food trade: French minister
-
Williams leaves Spain camp with thigh knock
-
Female US inmate in critical condition after botched execution
-
WTA reduces 2027 schedule for world's top 50
-
Spotlight on UK-UAE ties amid Manchester City scandal
-
US says 'in Europe's best interest' to cooperate on fuel supply
-
Ethiopia and Eritrea break diplomatic ties over conflict
-
Rogue OpenAI agents covered up their tracks, report says
-
Downing Street says Manchester City not 'above the rules'
-
A saintly spat and debate snub: Brazil enters final polls stretch
-
Hadjar wants to 'fight for the title' from next season
-
Zidane 'no regrets' about Materazzi headbutt as France face Italy again
-
Bolivia's attorney general arrested for alleged drug trafficking, money laundering
-
Libya's pay strike rallies teachers across divided nation
-
German sugar tax sparks new government row
-
Four-member crew blasts off for International Space Station
-
Musk returns to US government for Pentagon war study
-
i-payout Expands True Local Payment Capabilities to Help Enterprises Pay Recipients Globally
Top US court weighs major curbs to power of federal regulators
The US Supreme Court on Tuesday began hearing a series of cases that could result in a generational contraction in the power of federal agencies to regulate businesses and corporate fraud.
The first case before the conservative-dominated court seeks to eliminate one agency completely, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which was created by Congress in the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis.
If the justices side with the plaintiffs -- payday lending groups -- it could throw into doubt a raft of regulations enforced by the watchdog agency in the past 12 years on issues ranging from mortgages to credit cards to student loans.
The CFPB receives its funding, currently around $600 million a year, from the US Federal Reserve instead of through annual appropriations from Congress.
The case ended up in the nation's highest court after a conservative-controlled appeals court ruled the funding mechanism was unconstitutional, violating the appropriations clause of the Constitution which gives the power of the purse to Congress.
"Congress has not determined the amount that this agency should be spending," said Noel Francisco, representing the Community Financial Services Association of America which brought the case. "Instead, it has delegated to the director, the authority to pick his own appropriation."
Francisco's arguments appeared to be met with skepticism by a majority of the nine justices on the court, where conservatives outnumber liberals by six to three.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, a liberal, expressed concern about the courts meddling in what is traditionally Congress's turf.
"I'm a little worried I think about a separation of powers problem that may occur if the judiciary gets involved with telling Congress when and under what circumstances it can exercise its own prerogatives concerning funding," Jackson said.
"How do we avoid the judiciary becoming suddenly a super legislator, just telling Congress, agency by agency, whether it's a thumbs up or thumbs down?"
- 'Rounding error' -
Justice Sonia Sotomayor, another liberal, said that at $600 million the annual budget of the CFPB is just a "rounding error in the federal budget."
Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a conservative, said it was Congress itself that set up how the CFPB is funded and the legislature can always "change it tomorrow."
Senator Elizabeth Warren, the architect of the CFPB, said the case could have far-reaching consequences for other agencies and welfare programs that are similarly funded.
"The future of Social Security, Medicare, and every federal banking regulator is under grave threat if payday lenders and Wall Street banks get the Supreme Court to undermine the CFPB," the Democrat from Massachusetts said in a statement.
"The CFPB is under attack because it's an effective watchdog, returning over $17 billion back into the pockets of hard working Americans who were cheated," she said.
- Herring fishermen -
The CFPB case is one of three the court will hear during the current term that challenge the regulatory authority of federal agencies when it comes to banking, business, industry or the environment.
The conservative-majority court has previously ruled that the government's key environmental agency cannot issue broad limits on greenhouse gases, sharply curtailing the power of President Joe Biden's administration to battle climate change.
One of the upcoming cases stems from a requirement that herring fishermen in New England provide space onboard their vessels for observers from the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS).
Several fishing companies complained that they are being effectively forced to pay for the federal observers who are monitoring their operations.
A split appellate court ruled that the NMFS program was authorized under a 1984 ruling by the Supreme Court known as the "Chevron Doctrine" that says courts should defer to government agencies' interpretation of ambiguous federal laws.
The other case on the docket would curtail the power of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to adjudicate violations of federal securities laws.
The Supreme Court will issue its rulings in the cases by the end of June.
C.Bruderer--VB