-
Trump threatens 'dropping bombs' if Iran doesn't 'behave'
-
EU lawmakers approve 'return hubs' migration reform
-
Oil steadies, stocks rise as US-Iran peace talks approach
-
Global data declaration targets illegal fishing
-
US not 'pulling away' from allies by cutting NATO commitments: Rutte
-
'I'm the boss', Trump tells G7 counterparts
-
Adidas runs out of letter 'V' as German fans snap up World Cup shirts
-
Van Aert out of Tour de France with elbow injury
-
Bernardo Silva signs two-year deal with Real Madrid
-
Louvre museum 'running out of steam', says new director
-
German grid connection deal to boost North Sea wind power
-
G7 leaders applaud Iran, Ukraine progress ahead of tackling AI
-
Sovereignty fears dog AI enthusiasm at France's Vivatech
-
England enter World Cup fray as Ronaldo makes history
-
US military footprint growing in Australia: defence minister
-
France braces for heatwave with canal swimming allowed in Paris
-
Japan puts the heat on suspected ice cream cartel
-
Sovereignty fears to dog AI enthusiasm at France's Vivatech
-
MEXC May Report: SPACEX Launchpad Oversubscribed 15.5x, US Equity Futures Volume Jumps 85%
-
MEXC Prediction Markets Launches Combo to Enable Multi-Event Combination Trading
-
'We have always won': Ebola pioneer still on front line at 84
-
World Cup goals record 'just a number', says Messi
-
Australian far-right leader slams media, 'radical Islam' in testy press briefing
-
Stuffed toys and surfboards: Japan used goods market booms overseas
-
Messi salutes 'beautiful moment' after tying World Cup goals record
-
Putin hosts ASEAN leaders amid G7 pressure on Ukraine war
-
Iranian tankers exit US blockade zone ahead of peace talks
-
'Unstable' Tasmanian devil found after 15 days on the run
-
Magical Messi equals World Cup goals record as Argentina win
-
Messi equals World Cup goalscoring record in Argentina romp
-
Restore Britain, the hard-right party troubling Nigel Farage
-
Trap, neuter, release: Jakarta battles cat-astrophic stray numbers
-
Cuba's historic homes teeter on brink as economy collapses
-
EU lawmakers to approve migrant detention and deportation boost
-
Ronaldo as excited for sixth World Cup as his first, says Martinez
-
Macron winds up G7 with AI, Trump dinner
-
Norway coach hails Haaland after World Cup double
-
US Fed set to hold rates steady at Warsh's first meeting in charge
-
Argentina's Messi plays in record sixth World Cup
-
Kane tells England 'be free in the mind' for World Cup title bid
-
France and two-goal Mbappe roar into World Cup as Messi prepares
-
Trump ballroom cost soars to $600 mn, half from taxpayers: report
-
Swamp Thing: Algae mess with Trump's pool project
-
Haaland double powers Norway to World Cup win over Iraq
-
Sean Penn to direct film on January 6 Capitol assault: US media
-
Mbappe has World Cup history in sights after breaking France scoring record
-
Deschamps hails 'extraordinary' Mbappe as France win on World Cup bow
-
New Asian pop and folk categories announced by music's Grammy Awards
-
Europe eyes major treble at US Open as Scheffler seeks Slam
-
Ghana's Partey loses bid to enter Canada for World Cup
Pitt sues Jolie over sale of French vineyard where they married
Brad Pitt is suing Angelina Jolie for selling her share of the French vineyard where they got married.
Superstars Pitt and Jolie, who were once Hollywood's highest profile couple, bought a controlling stake of Chateau Miraval in southern France in 2008, and tied the knot there six years later.
But they filed to dissolve their marriage in 2016 and have remained locked in court battles since, including over custody rights for their six children.
According to a lawsuit filed by Pitt in California on Thursday, the couple had "agreed they would never sell their respective interests in Miraval without the other's consent."
But last October, Jolie sold her stake to a "a Luxembourg-based spirits manufacturer controlled by Russian oligarch Yuri Shefler," the legal document obtained by AFP says.
Pitt's filing alleges that Jolie broke the terms of their original agreement by not offering him first refusal for her share, and that she is seeking to "recover unearned windfall profits for herself while inflicting gratuitous harm on Pitt."
"Jolie long ago stopped contributing to Miraval -- while Pitt poured money and sweat equity into the wine business, building it into the ascendant company it is today," it states.
Pitt's lawsuit requests a trial by jury.
It describes the vineyard as a "small, unprofitable wine business" that was "in need of renovation" prior to the couple's purchase in 2008.
The pair paid "approximately 25 million euros," with Pitt contributing 60 per cent and Jolie the remaining 40 per cent.
But Pitt went on to pay for renovations "in a manner far disproportionate to his relative ownership share" on the understanding Jolie would not pull out of the investment without his consent, the suit says.
Pitt brought in Marc Perrin, one of France's top winemakers, to help transform the business into a leading rose wine producer, but "Jolie had no involvement in these efforts," it continues.
Revenues reportedly grew from approximately $3 million in 2013 to more than $50 million last year.
Jolie's representatives did not immediately respond to an AFP request for comment.
The A-listers first became a couple after co-starring as married assassins in 2004 film "Mr. and Mrs. Smith." Pitt was married to Jennifer Aniston at the time.
Pitt, now 58, was accused of striking one of his children during a flight from France to Los Angeles shortly before Jolie filed for divorce, but was later cleared by the FBI and social workers.
The pair announced in 2018 they had reached an amicable settlement over the children -- three biological and three adopted.
But last July, Jolie scored a win in their custody battle as the private judge overseeing their divorce and custody matters was disqualified from the case.
Judge John Ouderkirk -- who had also officiated their wedding at the vineyard -- was found to have financially benefited from separate work with Pitt's attorneys, and disqualified from the case by a California appeals court.
The ruling means the custody case essentially had to be restarted before a new judge.
K.Brown--BTB