-
French Senate weighs bill to make protesters pay for unrest damage
-
Youths testify about 'despair' in unprecedented Canadian climate trial
-
'A very sad day': Arteta despair as Arsenal stunned by Fleetwood
-
Syria, Jordan agree to mend ties after deadly strike
-
Charles tackles thorny legacy of slavery on Caribbean trip
-
Arsenal stunned by fourth-tier Fleetwood in League Cup
-
Former Grand Slam winner Wawrinka ends tennis career
-
Last-gasp Sabitzer strike sends Dortmund past Bremen in German Cup
-
Brazil's Flavio Bolsonaro flees to US after election loss
-
Rights groups reject Emirati diplomat for UN top job
-
'Faerie' nights: 'ACOTAR' fans finally get their book
-
Flavio Bolsonaro headed to US after Brazil election defeat: US media
-
American woman convicted of getting military training from Islamic State
-
Alcaraz and Zverev win Vienna openers
-
Israel opposition holds narrow edge over Netanyahu in first projections
-
Tech firms gain ahead of Fed decision, results from AI giants
-
Floriani hits maiden goal as Lazio go top
-
Syria condemns deadly Jordan strikes as 'unacceptable violation'
-
Trump set to drastically loosen oil and gas sector's methane rules
-
England's Fin Smith in race against time to face Australia
-
Storied Paris department store seeks bankruptcy protection
-
UN nuclear watchdog chief urges Iran to grant access
-
Xhaka, Embolo can return to Swiss squad after fake Covid docs affair
-
Boeing shares tumble after it releases cautious growth forecast
-
Allegri suspended for two Serie A games after red card
-
Lula's re-election revives Brazil-US tensions
-
Flight data, satellite images reveal growing US role at Ecuador base
-
Carney moves to remake Canada alliances as US ties strained
-
McInnes feels 'guilt' ahead of Hearts return with Rangers
-
Serbia's students demand state media chiefs resign after poll win
-
Brazil's Lula turns 81, vows to work '24 hours a day'
-
Starc takes six as Australia fight back in South Africa decider
-
Boeing releases cautious growth plan as shares fall sharply
-
UK man offered drugged wife to strangers online for sex: court
-
Exiled Russian dissident Navalnaya warns dictators becoming 'more cunning'
-
Africa Ebola outbreak passes 10,000 cases, mostly in DR Congo
-
Bayern 'risk' reaps huge reward for Ballon d'Or winner Kane
-
EU pushes for more nations to pay to protect nature
-
Record turnout as Israeli voters deliver verdict on Netanyahu
-
Boeing reports smaller loss as it aims for stable output growth
-
Iraola says Isak 'feels the trust' after Liverpool scoring streak
-
Tech firms gain on Anthropic IPO optimism; HSBC slumps in London
-
French media protest manhandling of journalists at far-right party rally
-
Sri Lanka end England hopes with crushing win over Pakistan
-
EU seeks deportation powers for beefed up border agency
-
Dangote, Nigeria's oil tycoon rewriting Africa's story
-
Two charged with UK security offences over airbase plot: police
-
Carrick to remain Man Utd boss for Chelsea clash: reports
-
Maresca defends Donnarumma, Guehi after Man City defeat
-
Greenhouse gas levels hit new record highs in 2025: UN
US Supreme Court rejects Trump bid to limit birthright citizenship
The US Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected President Donald Trump's bid to restrict birthright citizenship in a blow to one of his signature anti-immigration initiatives.
The court, in an eagerly awaited decision on the final day of its term, ruled 6-3 to maintain the right to American citizenship for nearly everyone born on US soil.
Trump signed an executive order last year on the first day of his second stint in the White House decreeing that children born to parents in the United States illegally or on temporary visas would not automatically become US citizens.
Lower courts blocked the move by the Republican president, ruling that under the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution nearly everyone born on US soil is an American citizen.
The Supreme Court agreed in a majority opinion penned by Chief Justice John Roberts that was joined by two other conservative justices and the three liberals on the top court.
"Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are 'subject to the jurisdiction' of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment's Citizenship Clause," Roberts wrote.
In an unprecedented move for a sitting US president, Trump personally attended oral arguments on birthright citizenship at the Supreme Court in April.
Trump stayed for the presentation by his solicitor general, John Sauer, but did not remain for the arguments of American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) attorney Cecillia Wang, who defended birthright citizenship.
Wang welcomed Tuesday's ruling, saying the court's decision "reaffirms a fundamental American promise -- if you are born here, you are a citizen."
"A president cannot change the Constitution by executive fiat," she said.
Trump called the decision upholding birthright citizenship "bad for our country."
He urged the Republican-controlled Congress in a Truth Social post to "start TODAY to work on ending expensive and unfair to our Country, Birthright Citizenship."
"They will have my Complete and Total Support!" he said.
- 'Birth tourism' -
Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship was part of his wider campaign to limit immigration, which includes expelling millions of undocumented migrants and removing deportation protections from nationals of more than a dozen countries.
During oral arguments before the Supreme Court, Sauer argued that unrestricted birthright citizenship encourages illegal immigration and "birth tourism," in which foreigners come to the United States solely to give birth.
The 14th Amendment states that "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."
It does not apply to those not subject to US jurisdiction -- the children of foreign diplomats, for example.
The Trump administration argued that the 14th Amendment, passed in the wake of the 1861-1865 Civil War, addresses citizenship rights of former slaves and not the children of undocumented migrants or visitors.
Trump's executive order banning birthright citizenship was premised on the notion that anyone in the United States illegally, or on a visa, is not "subject to the jurisdiction" of the country and therefore excluded from automatic citizenship.
The Supreme Court rejected such a narrow definition in a landmark 1898 case involving a man named Wong Kim Ark, who was born in San Francisco in 1873 to parents who had come to the United States from China.
After a visit to China, Wong Kim Ark was denied reentry into the United States in 1895 under the Chinese Exclusion Acts.
The Supreme Court ruled, however, that he was a US citizen by virtue of being born in the United States and Roberts, in his birthright opinion, referred to the case.
"We have repeatedly understood the rule of Wong Kim Ark to guarantee citizenship to all children born in the United States and subject to its power," Roberts said.
The Supreme Court's rejection of Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship is the third major loss for him this term. The justices struck down most of his global tariffs in February and on Monday they blocked his bid to fire Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook.
H.Gerber--VB