-
China badminton 'still strong' despite Asian Games slump
-
NATO, EU allies rally to Estonia after 'sabotage' blamed on Russia
-
'Exceptional' Turner painting shown in Rome before sale
-
Families demand justice for Cameroon's 'nightmare' wave of murdered women
-
European stocks climb as oil dips
-
Tebas says Man City should face 'most severe' sanctions if guilty of rule breaches
-
Spain aims to ban evictions until 2030 amid housing protests
-
Pochettino calls Man City success 'a period of deception'
-
Kunlavut first Thai man to win Asian Games badminton singles gold
-
Settler attack on West Bank village injures Israeli forces, drawing rare rebuke
-
French far right says antisemitism claims part of 'total war' to derail presidency bid
-
Mystery over UK airbase scare after reports no explosives found
-
'Gift from God': Rain brings relief from Indonesia toxic haze
-
Spanish govt races to adopt housing law under protest pressure
-
Ex-world snooker champion jailed for 7 years for child sex crimes
-
Estonia slams Russian 'sabotage' after arson attack on defence company
-
French teens clash with police as school blockades intensify
-
Slovenia sees surge in '.si' sites after Trump hypes 'super intelligence'
-
FIFA accuses UEFA of 'misinformation campaign' in bid for World Cup papers
-
'Like a dream' for An as Games organisers 'sorry' for latest mix-up
-
Myanmar airstrike toll hits 50 as families gather dead
-
Tokyo suffers longest streak of rainy days on record
-
STARTRADER Raises Lloyd's of London Client Fund Insurance to USD 30 Million in Aggregate
-
Indonesia charges train driver over crash that killed 16 women
-
North Korean DMZ landmine blasts 'violation of armistice': Seoul
-
Ruthless An makes history to retain Asian Games badminton crown
-
Sabalenka 'fresh' for first tournament since losing No.1 spot
-
Australian central bank lifts key interest rate to 15-year high
-
Myanmar airstrike death toll rises to 50: aid workers
-
Polo makes landfall in Mexico as Category 3 hurricane
-
North Korean DMZ landmine blast 'violation of armistice'
-
South Korea team latest to be bussed to wrong Asian Games venue
-
South Korea volleyball team latest to be bussed to wrong Games venue
-
Bears thrash Eagles 27-7 as third-string QB Keenum shines
-
Malaysia starts sending Myanmar migrants home
-
All Blacks name veteran Taylor captain as Mo'unga seizes 10 jersey
-
8.3 mn refugees at risk due to 'severe' funding cuts: UN
-
Race against time as Asian Games cricket quarter-finals washed out
-
Stocks drop and oil rises as Hormuz hopes fade
-
India turns to corals and seagrass to shield against rising seas
-
OpenAI cancels release of newest model due to safety concerns
-
Manchester City's Premier League charges: What comes next?
-
AI bosses head to White House as safety pressure builds
-
Brazil's cellphone crime: a security nightmare in every pocket
-
Batista sacked as Costa Rica coach after six months
-
Russia pummels Kyiv in latest deadly attack
-
Flooding, power cuts and evacuations as Hurricane Polo slams Mexico
-
U.S. Polo Assn. Brings 'Game On' to Life with the 2026 Fall-Winter Global Collection
-
fiskaltrust launches e-invoicing across Europe
-
NFL Giants obtain QB McCarthy from Vikings
UN court opinion due on occupied Palestinian land
The UN's top court will on Friday hand down its view on the legal consequences of Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories since 1967, amid growing international pressure over the war in Gaza.
Any opinion delivered by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) would be non-binding, but it comes amid mounting concern over Israel's war against Hamas sparked by the group's brutal October 7 attacks.
A separate high-profile case brought before the court by South Africa alleges that Israel has committed genocidal acts during its Gaza offensive.
Judges will read their findings at 1300 GMT at the opulent Peace Palace in The Hague, the home of the ICJ.
The UN's General Assembly asked the ICJ in late 2022 to give an "advisory opinion" on the "legal consequences arising from the policies and practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem".
The ICJ held a week-long session in February to hear submissions from countries following the request -- supported by most countries within the Assembly.
Most speakers too during the hearings called on Israel to end its 57-year occupation. They warned a prolonged occupation posed an "extreme danger" to stability in the Middle East and beyond.
But the United States said Israel should not be legally obliged to withdraw without taking its "very real security needs" into account.
Israel did not take part in the oral hearings.
Instead, it submitted a written contribution in which it described the questions the court had been asked as "prejudicial" and "tendentious".
- 'Ongoing violation' -
The General Assembly has asked the ICJ to consider two questions.
Firstly, the court should examine the legal consequences of what the UN called "the ongoing violation by Israel of the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination".
This relates to the "prolonged occupation, settlement and annexation of the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967" and "measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem".
In June 1967, Israel crushed some of its Arab neighbours in a six-day war, seizing the West Bank including east Jerusalem from Jordan, the Golan Heights from Syria, and the Gaza Strip and Sinai Peninsula from Egypt.
Israel then began to settle the 70,000 square kilometres (27,000 square miles) of seized Arab territory.
The UN later declared the occupation of Palestinian territory illegal, and Cairo regained Sinai under its 1979 peace deal with Israel.
The ICJ has also been asked to look into the consequences of what it described as Israel's "adoption of related discriminatory legislation and measures".
Secondly, the ICJ should advise on how Israel's actions "affect the legal status of the occupation" and what are the consequences for the UN and other countries.
The ICJ rules in disputes between states. Normally, its judgements are binding although it has little means to enforce them.
In this case however, the opinion it issues will be non-binding, although most advisory opinions are in fact acted upon.
D.Bachmann--VB