
-
Celtic and Rangers seek Old Firm tonic for Champions League trauma
-
Aussie Rules player latest found with concussion-linked brain disease
-
Zelensky urges more Western pressure on Putin after deadly Russian attack
-
US ends tariff exemption for small packages shipped globally
-
Asia stocks mixed after Wall St hits new highs
-
Cash-strapped Taliban look to airspace for windfall
-
Biles' presence helps Gauff win US Open crying game
-
'Female power': Japan erotic art destigmatised in new exhibit
-
Olympic marathon champion Hassan opts for Sydney ahead of worlds
-
Atletico already playing catch-up after poor La Liga start
-
Lyon find cause for optimism after turbulent summer
-
Sinner on the march as tearful Gauff, Swiatek toil at US Open
-
Julia Roberts to make Venice debut in cancel culture drama
-
Big numbers set to remain a feature of Women's Rugby World Cup
-
Families lose hope for Salvadorans held in gang crackdown
-
Trump thumbs nose at decades of India courtship
-
Gauff wins crying game to reach US Open third round
-
Arsenal seek statement win at Liverpool, Amorim faces Burnley must-win
-
Cowboys trade Parsons to Packers in blockbuster NFL deal
-
Venezuela revives heroes with AI to spur reservists on US 'threat'
-
Solskjaer sacked by Besiktas after European flop
-
Froome to undergo surgery after breaking back in training crash
-
US targets Venezuela over 'Soles' cartel. Does it exist?
-
Coe hails 'overwhelming support' for gene testing ahead of Tokyo worlds
-
Solskjaer fired by Besiktas after Conference League failure, Palace squeeze through
-
Osaka slams Ostapenko rant in US Open 'racism' storm
-
US church shooter 'obsessed with idea of killing children'
-
US stocks reach new peaks as investors digest US GDP
-
US approves $825 mn missile sale to Ukraine
-
Rubio to visit Mexico, Ecuador next week to discuss migration, China: US
-
Lyles edges Tebogo in Zurich thriller in perfect Tokyo boost
-
Lyles trumps Tebogo in Zurich, Alfred shines
-
Arsenal optimistic about Havertz return after knee surgery
-
Pressure-free Wong relishing US Open adventure
-
RFK Jr bashes US health agency after its chief is sacked
-
Swiatek wobbles at US Open as Sinner targets third round
-
Alfred storms to 100m victory at Diamond League finals
-
Bison herds 'reawaken' Yellowstone's prairies
-
RFK Jr bashes US health agency after firing its chief
-
Swiatek labours into US Open third round
-
UN sets 2027 exit for Lebanon peacekeepers after Israeli strikes
-
Brazil police target network that siphoned billions from fuel sector
-
Liverpool and Man City face Real Madrid in Champions League, PSG get tough draw
-
'Strangest' dinosaur covered in spiked armoury: scientists
-
UN Security Council votes for Lebanon peacekeepers to leave in 2027
-
Badminton federation smoothes feathers ruffled by shuttlecock shortage
-
Luxury carmaker Lotus to slash UK jobs amid US tariffs
-
Small parcels in limbo as Trump moves to end US tariff exemption
-
Russian attack killing 19 in Kyiv unleashes international fury
-
UN chief condemns 'endless' Gaza horrors as Israel presses offensive

Pakistan's political crisis: What happens next?
Pakistan's supreme court is meeting for the third time Wednesday to rule on the legality of political manoeuvres that led Prime Minister Imran Khan to dissolve the national assembly over the weekend and call for fresh elections.
The court says it will only rule on whether the deputy speaker acted against the constitution in refusing to allow a vote on a no-confidence motion against Khan -- although that would affect the dissolution of the assembly.
It also won't consider the alleged "foreign conspiracy" that Khan says the opposition joined to unseat him.
So what are the possible court rulings, and what would be the consequences?
Here follows the likely scenarios:
- 'It's not our business' -
The court could decide that the national assembly is responsible for its own rules and regulations, and the refusal of the deputy speaker -- a Khan loyalist -- to hold a vote is a matter for lawmakers to settle.
However, some legal analysts argue it is an issue for the court -- according to the constitution, the prime minister cannot ask the president to dissolve the assembly if a no-confidence vote is pending.
Still, the court could decide the decision to refuse the vote effectively meant the matter was no longer pending, sending the issue back to the assembly -- which would mean the dissolution likely stands.
- 'The deputy speaker acted illegally'-
In this case the ruling would effectively nullify the subsequent decision to dissolve parliament, so lawmakers could be ordered to reconvene and Khan would almost certainly be booted out of office.
There is precedent, however.
In 1988, Muhammad Khan Junejo appealed to the court after the assembly was dissolved by then-president General Zia-ul-Haq, who had taken power in a military coup years earlier.
It agreed his government had been dissolved unconstitutionally, but ruled that since elections had been announced anyway it was best to move on.
No date has been set for elections in the current crisis, but a similar ruling could emerge.
Also, in 1993, the court ruled president Ghulam Ishaq Khan had illegally dissolved the assembly -- then with Nawaz Sharif as prime minister.
Although the government resumed business, it lasted less than two months before being dissolved again.
- 'The deputy speaker acted legally'-
If the court rules nothing untoward happened, it seems likely all subsequent actions would also stand and Pakistan would go to polls within 90 days.
The rancour and bitterness the issue has unearthed means, however, that the country faces more political uncertainty.
Past elections have been violent, messy affairs, and a campaign season beginning during the fasting month of Ramadan and continuing through the hottest period of the year will fray nerves and raise tensions.
The stakes have also been raised by Khan's anti-US rhetoric -- a potential flashpoint during political rallies.
- 'No appeals against our decision' -
The supreme court has received a slew of petitions and countersuits on the saga.
But it said it was taking the case "suo motu", meaning on its own account.
The supreme court is ostensibly independent, but rights activists say previous benches have been used by civilian and military administrations to do their bidding throughout Pakistan's history.
No ruling will please all parties, but as the highest court in the land it would also be responsible for hearing any possible appeals against its own ruling.
That seems unlikely, however, and a definitive decision will likely see a return to status quo and another round of political squabbling.
By law, an election must be held before October 2023.
J.Fankhauser--BTB