-
Frustrated families demand recovery of Venezuela's earthquake dead
-
Sabalenka sets up Wimbledon last-16 clash with Osaka
-
Williams sisters return, Swiatek faces Eala test at Wimbledon
-
Dangerous heatwave hits peak temps along US east coast
-
'Ecstatic' Hamilton rolls back the years with Silverstone pole
-
LeBron's agent makes case for 10 new clubs for 41-year-old star
-
England enter World Cup lion's den as Mexico host them at Azteca fortress
-
Trump heads for Mount Rushmore as US turns 250
-
Hamilton beats Antonelli to British GP sprint pole with supreme lap
-
French Top 14 champions Toulouse fined for salary cap breaches
-
Title rivals Djokovic and Sinner advance at Wimbledon
-
Record-equalling Djokovic powers into Wimbledon last 16
-
Ferrari confirm Hamilton staying next year
-
Ruthless Sinner powers into Wimbledon last 16
-
Global frenzy over Swift, Kelce's glittering 'royal wedding'
-
England's Kane feels 'as good as ever' ahead of Mexico World Cup clash
-
Three acquitted of 2019 murder of N.Irish journalist Lyra McKee
-
French Top 14 champions Toulouse fined for salary breaches
-
Stokes bids farewell to fans after 'mad 15 years'
-
Thousands more head for South Africa's borders
-
One for the history books: what we know about the European heatwave
-
Australia upbeat about 'ultimate professional' Perry's fitness for World Cup final
-
Dutch FA to sue over racist slurs after World Cup exit
-
Ukraine backers to vow major support at NATO summit
-
Mercedes demos set stage for wave of German auto protests
-
Ayuso happy to fly under radar at Tour de France
-
Iran leaders pay last respects to Khamenei as mourners gather
-
Curran ready to fill England gap left by Stokes exit
-
UN issues 'red alert' over 'catastrophe' in Sudan's El-Obeid
-
Djokovic has history on the line at Wimbledon
-
Tour de France to start with team time-trial 'bang'
-
Hamilton sparkles in Silverstone sunshine
-
Dressed for success: Osaka reaches Wimbledon last 16 for first time
-
Swift and Kelce set to tie the knot in glitzy arena extravaganza
-
Bayern sign Germany defender Brown until 2031
-
Police hunt for Ukrainian woman over Monaco bomb attack
-
MEXC's June Highlights: $437 Billion in Trading Volume, Offering Access to 7,000+ US Stocks and ETFs
-
Kenya's abortion taboo is killing thousands of women
-
Stocks mostly rise as beaten-down tech stocks enjoy bounce
-
Madonna returns to form with dancefloor filler "Confessions II"
-
Iranian leaders pay respects to supreme leader as Tehran prepares for funeral
-
Dean says Australia final a 'fresh start' for England
-
Doubles not a 'carnival sideshow' say players amid schedule row
-
Wimbledon giving Serena 'as much time' as possible for doubles
-
Klopp in 'talks' for Germany job after Nagelsmann exit: federation
-
Chinese investors flock to Hong Kong as trading curbs tighten
-
Surging real estate development divides opinion on Athens' riviera
-
Projected 'super typhoon' heads for US Pacific islands
-
Move over, Messi! Robot footballers thrill crowds in South Korea
-
UN warns of strong looming El Nino
EU court advisor recommends new ruling in Apple tax case
The European Court of Justice's top legal advisor recommended on Thursday that an EU court make a new ruling in the long-running 13-billion-euro ($14-billion) tax case between Apple and Brussels.
The landmark case is one of the most fierce battles between the European Commission and big tech, dating back to 2016 when the EU's executive arm accused Ireland of allowing Apple to escape 13 billion euros in taxes.
The EU claimed that, between 2003 and 2014, Apple parked untaxed revenue earned in Europe, Africa, the Middle East and India in Ireland, which is the European hub for big tech.
Brussels alleged that this amounted to illegal "state aid" by Ireland.
The opinion of Advocate General Giovanni Pitruzzella is not binding on the court, but it will be influential and taken as a sign of the direction the case is taking.
The bloc's highest court heard the commission's appeal earlier this year against a 2020 decision by the EU's lower General Court to annul its order that Apple repay the money.
But according to Pitruzzella, the General Court "committed a series of errors in law", and therefore he recommended setting aside the previous judgement.
"In the Advocate General's opinion, it is therefore necessary for the General Court to carry out a new assessment," the ECJ said in a statement.
A final decision by the ECJ is expected within a few months but the judges are not bound by Thursday's opinion.
Apple has pushed back against the commission's claims.
"The General Court's ruling was very clear that Apple received no selective advantage and no state aid, and we believe that should be upheld," Apple said in a statement.
During a hearing in May, the commission's lawyer, Paul-John Loewenthal, told the ECJ there had been a "breach of procedure" and "numerous other legal errors" when the lower court heard the case.
Apple's lawyer Daniel Beard pushed back against Loewenthal's claims at the time. "Apple has paid the taxes that were due under the Irish tax code," Beard said.
Apple has been present in Ireland since the 1980s.
The EU has faced difficulty justifying its tax decisions in recent years with previous court losses against Amazon and Starbucks.
R.Kloeti--VB