-
England v Mexico World Cup game kickoff time unchanged: FIFA
-
Swift and Kelce marry as global stars swarm 'royal wedding'
-
McDonald's, bus station convert into Venezuela quake clinics
-
Hurdles record-breaker Tharp says 'sky's the limit'
-
'Super typhoon' Bavi heads for US Pacific islands
-
Salah says 'had to do it' after coolest of penalties in World Cup win
-
England seek end to Australia agony in Women's World Cup final
-
Australia's Popovic on defensive as gamble fails in World Cup exit
-
President-elect Fujimori hails 'new chapter' for Peru
-
Maiden ton for Udara as Sri Lanka pile on the runs in 2nd Test
-
Global celebrities pay court at Swift, Kelce "royal wedding"
-
Norway pin hopes on Haaland against Brazil in World Cup last 16
-
Dangerous heat wave roasts America's big birthday party
-
Egypt down Australia to reach World Cup last 16, Cape Verde face Messi
-
Egypt edge Australia on penalties to reach World Cup last 16
-
Families demand help with recovering Venezuela's quake victims
-
France braced for extreme heat threat in World Cup clash with Paraguay
-
England's Rashford unfazed by high-altitude Mexico World Cup test
-
Iranians begin to gather for Khamenei funeral ceremonies
-
In Brazil, Bolsonaro family airs feud ahead of elections
-
England v Mexico World Cup kickoff could be moved earlier: source
-
Postecoglou links up with Ronaldo at Al Nassr
-
Frustrated families demand recovery of Venezuela's earthquake dead
-
Sabalenka sets up Wimbledon last-16 clash with Osaka
-
Williams sisters return, Swiatek faces Eala test at Wimbledon
-
Dangerous heatwave hits peak temps along US east coast
-
'Ecstatic' Hamilton rolls back the years with Silverstone pole
-
LeBron's agent makes case for 10 new clubs for 41-year-old star
-
England enter World Cup lion's den as Mexico host them at Azteca fortress
-
Trump heads for Mount Rushmore as US turns 250
-
Hamilton beats Antonelli to British GP sprint pole with supreme lap
-
French Top 14 champions Toulouse fined for salary cap breaches
-
Title rivals Djokovic and Sinner advance at Wimbledon
-
Record-equalling Djokovic powers into Wimbledon last 16
-
Ferrari confirm Hamilton staying next year
-
Ruthless Sinner powers into Wimbledon last 16
-
Global frenzy over Swift, Kelce's glittering 'royal wedding'
-
England's Kane feels 'as good as ever' ahead of Mexico World Cup clash
-
Three acquitted of 2019 murder of N.Irish journalist Lyra McKee
-
French Top 14 champions Toulouse fined for salary breaches
-
Stokes bids farewell to fans after 'mad 15 years'
-
Thousands more head for South Africa's borders
-
One for the history books: what we know about the European heatwave
-
Australia upbeat about 'ultimate professional' Perry's fitness for World Cup final
-
Dutch FA to sue over racist slurs after World Cup exit
-
Ukraine backers to vow major support at NATO summit
-
Mercedes demos set stage for wave of German auto protests
-
Ayuso happy to fly under radar at Tour de France
-
Iran leaders pay last respects to Khamenei as mourners gather
-
Curran ready to fill England gap left by Stokes exit
Top French court upholds hijab ban in women's football
France's top administrative court on Thursday upheld a ban on women football players wearing Islamic hijab headscarves, after the issue was seized on by politicians claiming secularism was at risk.
"Sporting federations whose task is to ensure the good functioning of public services... can impose a neutrality requirement on their players in competitions and sporting events, to guarantee the smooth running of matches and any clashes or confrontation," the Constitutional Council said in a statement.
It found a French Football Federation (FFF) rule against "any sign or clothing clearly showing political, philosophical, religious or union affiliation" during play to be "appropriate and proportionate".
A group of Muslim women footballers called the "Hijabeuses" had launched the action against the FFF regulation.
The FFF said simply that it had "taken note" of the ruling, adding that the sporting body "reaffirms the republican and civic values that bring football to life, and its total commitment to fighting all forms of discrimination and promoting female-male equality".
Marion Ogier, a lawyer for the "Hijabeuses", said the decision "upsets secularism and freedom of expression" as well as "abusing 30 years of legal precedent" on the question.
"This decision goes against social cohesion in a country founded on diversity and pluralism," she told AFP.
Judges had found themselves under political pressure ahead of the ruling as mainstream parties look to fend off the far right riding high in the polls.
Secularism is a sensitive topic in France, presented by its defenders as a way of guaranteeing the state's religious neutrality and by critics as a dog-whistle against ethnic and religious minorities, especially Muslims.
- 'Don't need to know religion' -
A Monday boost for the "Hijabeuses", when the state's legal advisor concluded the rule was unjustified, prompted a wave of political condemnation.
Interior Minister Gerald Darmanin, a law-and-order hardliner, said Tuesday, "I hope profoundly for the republic that (judges) uphold neutrality on sports fields."
The "Hijabeuses" were hoping to give the republic a "battering", Darmanin added.
"You shouldn't wear religious clothing when you play sports... when you play football, you don't need to know the religion of the person in front of you," he said.
Other voices from the conservative Republicans party and far-right National Rally have also chimed in.
Far-right leader Marine Le Pen wrote on Twitter: "No to the hijab in sport. And we will pass a law to make sure it is respected."
Republicans chief Eric Ciotti said his party -- which holds just 62 seats in France's 577-seat parliament -- would introduce a bill on the topic if the court allowed the hijab.
Sports Minister Amelie Oudea-Castera has also suggested Macron's government could legislate, saying "we aren't ruling anything out" and "we can see that there's a need for clarification".
The Constitutional Council itself shot back Wednesday at what it said were "attacks aimed at the administrative branch and especially the legal advisor".
Questioning the workings of the courts was "an attack on an institution that is essential for democracy," the body added, saying it could take legal action in cases of "insult, defamation, incitement to hatred or threats".
J.Fankhauser--BTB