-
Marquez wins in Malaysia to stand on brink of MotoGP world title
-
Marquez wins Malaysian MotoGP to move to brink of world title
-
Binance says resuming withdrawals after major hack
-
Shnaider beats Fernandez to win Tokyo title
-
Divided Bulgaria votes in tense presidential runoff
-
Winds of change: Laos looks up for renewables push
-
Trump says US looking 'closely' at report Nvidia CEO target of China spy plot
-
Sri Lanka's war widows and the long search for the missing
-
Maxey scores 38 to lead Sixers 'fighters' to another comeback win
-
'Air-con nation' Singapore eyes alternatives to cool down
-
Valkyries defeat Dream to capture first WNBA crown
-
US judge dismisses Trump lawsuit against Wall Street Journal over Epstein letter
-
'Seen and heard': Uruguay neighborhood places hopes in pope
-
Slave or not? US gallery shows early photos of African Americans
-
Spewing US election falsehoods, AI chatbots face scrutiny
-
France's Aymoz wins Skate Canada men's crown
-
EU's new levy on parcels kicks in
-
Pope Leo readies for 'intense' South America homecoming
-
Ocon denies reports of altercation after being dumped by Haas
-
Antonelli admits to feeling tense of eve of potential F1 title decider
-
Hamilton says love of racing keeps him young
-
FBI says North Korea behind $6 billion crypto theft from Binance
-
'Disgraceful' Australia face reckoning after South Africa humbling
-
'Canelo' Alvarez wins back WBC title from Mbilli in Riyadh
-
Sovereignty wins Breeders' Cup Classic, Benvenuto Cellini triumphs in Turf for O'Brien
-
'Canelo' Alvarez wins back WBC title from Mbilli
-
Hamilton takes record 105th pole and first for Ferrari, as Antonelli lurks
-
Sovereignty wins Breeders' Cup Classic
-
German rioters loot shops as 'Gen Z' demos turn ugly
-
Hamilton grabs pole position for Mexican Grand Prix
-
Barca hammer Alaves to retain Liga top spot
-
Benvenuto Cellini wins Breeders' Cup Turf
-
UK king to address Commonwealth with 'unflinching honesty' amid slavery focus
-
Roma thrash Udinese ahead of Milan derby
-
US judge dismisses Trump lawsuit against Wall Steet Journal over Epstein letter
-
Kane laments Dortmund draw after 'incredible high' of Ballon d'Or
-
Polish president holds crisis talks in court standoff
-
Spanish village holds memorial mass for train crash victims
-
NFL to review new allegations against Packers' Jacobs: reports
-
Israeli protesters demand opposition ally with Arab parties to oust Netanyahu
-
Le Havre owners sack coach after PSG thrashing
-
De Minaur upsets Zverev and will face Alcaraz in Vienna final
-
De Minaur upsets Zverev and will face Alacaraz in Vienna final
-
Kane misses penalty as Bayern held by Dortmund
-
German police, protesters clash after 'Gen Z' demos
-
In Mexico City, Day of the Dead parade inspired by 007
-
Fresh frustration for Maresca as Man City lose to Brighton
-
Rubio flags challenges in finding consensus as G20 talks wrap
-
Norris fastest ahead of Antonelli in final Mexico practice
-
Zaman's century foils Sri Lanka as Pakistan win tri-series
Top French court upholds hijab ban in women's football
France's top administrative court on Thursday upheld a ban on women football players wearing Islamic hijab headscarves, after the issue was seized on by politicians claiming secularism was at risk.
"Sporting federations whose task is to ensure the good functioning of public services... can impose a neutrality requirement on their players in competitions and sporting events, to guarantee the smooth running of matches and any clashes or confrontation," the Constitutional Council said in a statement.
It found a French Football Federation (FFF) rule against "any sign or clothing clearly showing political, philosophical, religious or union affiliation" during play to be "appropriate and proportionate".
A group of Muslim women footballers called the "Hijabeuses" had launched the action against the FFF regulation.
The FFF said simply that it had "taken note" of the ruling, adding that the sporting body "reaffirms the republican and civic values that bring football to life, and its total commitment to fighting all forms of discrimination and promoting female-male equality".
Marion Ogier, a lawyer for the "Hijabeuses", said the decision "upsets secularism and freedom of expression" as well as "abusing 30 years of legal precedent" on the question.
"This decision goes against social cohesion in a country founded on diversity and pluralism," she told AFP.
Judges had found themselves under political pressure ahead of the ruling as mainstream parties look to fend off the far right riding high in the polls.
Secularism is a sensitive topic in France, presented by its defenders as a way of guaranteeing the state's religious neutrality and by critics as a dog-whistle against ethnic and religious minorities, especially Muslims.
- 'Don't need to know religion' -
A Monday boost for the "Hijabeuses", when the state's legal advisor concluded the rule was unjustified, prompted a wave of political condemnation.
Interior Minister Gerald Darmanin, a law-and-order hardliner, said Tuesday, "I hope profoundly for the republic that (judges) uphold neutrality on sports fields."
The "Hijabeuses" were hoping to give the republic a "battering", Darmanin added.
"You shouldn't wear religious clothing when you play sports... when you play football, you don't need to know the religion of the person in front of you," he said.
Other voices from the conservative Republicans party and far-right National Rally have also chimed in.
Far-right leader Marine Le Pen wrote on Twitter: "No to the hijab in sport. And we will pass a law to make sure it is respected."
Republicans chief Eric Ciotti said his party -- which holds just 62 seats in France's 577-seat parliament -- would introduce a bill on the topic if the court allowed the hijab.
Sports Minister Amelie Oudea-Castera has also suggested Macron's government could legislate, saying "we aren't ruling anything out" and "we can see that there's a need for clarification".
The Constitutional Council itself shot back Wednesday at what it said were "attacks aimed at the administrative branch and especially the legal advisor".
Questioning the workings of the courts was "an attack on an institution that is essential for democracy," the body added, saying it could take legal action in cases of "insult, defamation, incitement to hatred or threats".
J.Fankhauser--BTB